RB Carlos Hyde Thread

Originally posted by IdahoNiner:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Well, this isn't good.

Per @NeumannNFL, Carlos Hyde's @PFF grades ranked dead last among qualifying running backs in 2017 in receiving (34.9) and pass-blocking (28.3). https://t.co/obqqdXY2IB #49ers

— Al Sacco (@AlSacco49) February 28, 2018

Wow. I actually agree with PFF for once. He was horrible most of last season. I really dont see why any fans would want him back.

And on that note.

http://www.49erswebzone.com/articles/114092-49ers-meet-carlos-hydes-agent-nfl-scouting-combine/

Originally posted by NCommand:

And on that note.

http://www.49erswebzone.com/articles/114092-49ers-meet-carlos-hydes-agent-nfl-scouting-combine/

I'll be pissed if we extend him and bow out on the RBs in the draft.

Originally posted by Heroism:

Originally posted by BuZzB05:

Why? He is suck? Can u explain when u don't want him for?

He is suck and old is.

Lol. Look at LeGarrette Blount is 31 years old. He looked a great game for Eagles. We should sign Jonathan Stewart for one year because he is 30 years old and not bad age. I think, Stewart can running for part time and plus Breida is running for part time then both are running for part time. If Stewart is power running for 3rd down then get 1st down for helped lot and make better. Come on.. Just think twice..

I heard the Patriots will sign LeGarrette Blount back his team again. We must sign LeGarrette Blount for one year! Get LeGarrette Blount for the 49ers!

Originally posted by mojave45:

Simple question is would you rather have Hyde for the money or any of a plethora of backs available in the draft and FA? I think he is easily replaceable. And easy to upgrade from. Even if we have to go to a running back by committee solution I don't see this as a big question.

How many times have we tried replacing him with other backs tho?

Hayne?Lattimore?Reggie Bush?mike davis ?Brieda?Hightower?

Franchise him and move along.

Originally posted by illinois9er:

Originally posted by NCommand:
And on that note.

http://www.49erswebzone.com/articles/114092-49ers-meet-carlos-hydes-agent-nfl-scouting-combine/

I'll be pissed if we extend him and bow out on the RBs in the draft.

Its not exactly a ringing endorsement to only be speaking with your free agent starting RB's agent come combine time. I dont see any shot at him coming back.

Originally posted by illinois9er:

Originally posted by NCommand:
And on that note.

http://www.49erswebzone.com/articles/114092-49ers-meet-carlos-hydes-agent-nfl-scouting-combine/

I'll be pissed if we extend him and bow out on the RBs in the draft.

This is just a chance to see what Hyde wants and let Hyde know what the 49ers expect. If those two meet, then he re-signs here.

It does not mean that the 49ers will not draft a RB. However, as noted above, with the Foster situation, it bumps the RB need down a level. CB, OL and LB are now greater needs than RB. We don't have as many picks this year as we did last year, hence, the ones we do have must go for high priority positions unless a BPA just blows Lynch away.

We won 5 straight games last year with Hyde as the starting RB.

Originally posted by TonyStarks:

Originally posted by mojave45:

Simple question is would you rather have Hyde for the money or any of a plethora of backs available in the draft and FA? I think he is easily replaceable. And easy to upgrade from. Even if we have to go to a running back by committee solution I don't see this as a big question.

How many times have we tried replacing him with other backs tho?

Hayne?Lattimore?Reggie Bush?mike davis ?Brieda?Hightower?

Franchise him and move along.

^^^^^ exactly it.

Originally posted by BuZzB05:

Originally posted by TonyStarks:

Originally posted by mojave45:
Simple question is would you rather have Hyde for the money or any of a plethora of backs available in the draft and FA? I think he is easily replaceable. And easy to upgrade from. Even if we have to go to a running back by committee solution I don't see this as a big question.

How many times have we tried replacing him with other backs tho?

Hayne?Lattimore?Reggie Bush?mike davis ?Brieda?Hightower?

Franchise him and move along.

^^^^^ exactly it.

More like how many times have we tried to replace Gore since Baalke let him walk....

Originally posted by TonyStarks:

How many times have we tried replacing him with other backs tho?

Hayne?Lattimore?Reggie Bush?mike davis ?Brieda?Hightower?

Franchise him and move along.

You want to franchise Carlos Hyde? Look at the guys you are bringing up as potential replacements lol.

Originally posted by jcs:

Originally posted by BuZzB05:

Originally posted by TonyStarks:

Originally posted by mojave45:

Simple question is would you rather have Hyde for the money or any of a plethora of backs available in the draft and FA? I think he is easily replaceable. And easy to upgrade from. Even if we have to go to a running back by committee solution I don't see this as a big question.

How many times have we tried replacing him with other backs tho?

Hayne?Lattimore?Reggie Bush?mike davis ?Brieda?Hightower?

Franchise him and move along.

^^^^^ exactly it.

More like how many times have we tried to replace Gore since Baalke let him walk....

Dude. 49ers fans let Gore to walk away because they don't want pay him for raised moneys. Lol.

Originally posted by illinois9er:

Originally posted by TonyStarks:

How many times have we tried replacing him with other backs tho?

Hayne?Lattimore?Reggie Bush?mike davis ?Brieda?Hightower?

Franchise him and move along.

You want to franchise Carlos Hyde?

Nah. We don't need use franchise Hyde. We can ask him stay here for one year if Hyde would love to sign for us here. If Hyde don't want live here then respect him what he want to. Just simple.

Originally posted by BuZzB05:

Originally posted by TonyStarks:

Originally posted by mojave45:
Simple question is would you rather have Hyde for the money or any of a plethora of backs available in the draft and FA? I think he is easily replaceable. And easy to upgrade from. Even if we have to go to a running back by committee solution I don't see this as a big question.

How many times have we tried replacing him with other backs tho?

Hayne?Lattimore?Reggie Bush?mike davis ?Brieda?Hightower?

Franchise him and move along.

^^^^^ exactly it.

A rugby star, a one legged RB, a guy at the twilight of his career, a workout warrior. Did likely take his job, fodder.

Common man, you act like any previous regemes ever really tried to replace him. Fact is, no one has tried to replace Hyde until last season. The first time someone has tried to replace Hyde (see Breida a UDFA) and they likely succeeded lol.

Originally posted by IdahoNiner:

A rugby star, a one legged RB, a guy at the twilight of his career, a workout warrior. Did likely take his job, fodder.

Common man, you act like any previous regemes ever really tried to replace him. Fact is, no one has tried to replace Hyde until last season. The first time someone has tried to replace Hyde (see Breida a UDFA) and they likely succeeded lol.

BOOM!

Originally posted by dj43:
This is just a chance to see what Hyde wants and let Hyde know what the 49ers expect. If those two meet, then he re-signs here.

It does not mean that the 49ers will not draft a RB. However, as noted above, with the Foster situation, it bumps the RB need down a level. CB, OL and LB are now greater needs than RB. We don't have as many picks this year as we did last year, hence, the ones we do have must go for high priority positions unless a BPA just blows Lynch away.

We won 5 straight games last year with Hyde as the starting RB.

And he was worse than Breida, an UDFA the entire run.