Originally posted by btthepunk:it was actually at 1-2
I think it was at this time last year a lot of people were writing us off. Calm down people.


There are 314 users in the forums
Originally posted by btthepunk:it was actually at 1-2
I think it was at this time last year a lot of people were writing us off. Calm down people.
Originally posted by NinerGM:
Originally posted by aTx49er:
Originally posted by jonesadrian:
+ Show all quotes
they didn't stop gore at any point and he only got 13 carries hyde only got 4. they were geared up to play the read option after what happened to them last week. so just smash them in the mouth and win the game.
my problem with roman is he didn't commit to something. he ran a cute offense instead of one designed to do something. if they're gong to load the box spread them out use all the wr's and te's and make them come out of it. no shots down the field nothing. why?
cause that's what roman does. as soon as i heard chris collinsworth say roman was upset he didn't get to use his plays against dallas because we were up so much (which pretty much confirms the fact that we went right into cruise control for the 2nd half of the game) i knew it was going to be a long night and it was. i can't tell you how many times we ran the same damn play action bootleg play to the point the bears new it was coming before they even finished the play.
we didn't run bunch formation 1 time. not once.
not 1 single time.
In the 49ers only possession in the 3rd quarter Gore was stopped for 0 or negatives yards on 4 of 5 plays where he ran. And Hyde had 4 carries for 0 yards.
Not the cut-back runs ... sure we were stuffed on the obvious up the middle when there was a safety waiting .....
Originally posted by communist:i do not buy into the super bowl or bust theory with the way teams are built nowadays with free agency, people leaving at will.. i go by my line.. a super bowl is great but given the way the nfl wants parity all over the place,, i think being in the hunt for a divisional title and a deep run in the playoffs is success to me. probably not your answer you were looking for . despite the new toys we have,, we are the same type of team we were three years ago,, that will not change drastically in my opinion as long as jh and roman are here... you just have to ask yourself if thats ok as you compare what other teams are doing or not doing around the nfl
Originally posted by cciowa:Do you think that we have to deliver this year, given the talent on the team?
that is a terrifying thing to imagine given our current back up qbs and what we have invested in CK... if we struggle this year and if JH thinks he was wrong about ck(which he would never come out and say) he will go to michigan and if that happens, I will take that as a sign JH has lost confidence in ck.... HOWEVER,, i stress last year we had these same thoughts at 1-2 and the team righted the ship which is usually does when its back is against the wall,, so i want to give this thing some time before we break out the pitchforks and torches
Originally posted by DeUh:
Originally posted by PA49ersfan:
I agree with what you guys are saying. But in all honesty, what can the team do now? What are the options for them now? Who do we turn to for help?
1. Greg Roman should be fired immediately. And no, this is not a knee jerk reaction. The man is a walking piece of mediocrity.
2. Geep Chryst should take over offensive coordinator and play-calling duties immediately.
Chryst served as San Diego Chargers offensive coordinator/quarterbacks coach (1999-2000). Chryst implemented the no-huddle offense in San Diego in 1999, which led to Harbaugh enjoying the second-highest passing output (2,761 passing yards) of his 15-year career. The Chargers also completed the most passes (332) in 13 years with Chryst directing the offense and Harbaugh became the first quarterback in team history since Hall of Famer Dan Fouts to pass for 400 yards in a game, that year.
In 2009, Chryst was part of an offensive coaching staff that helped the Panthers become the first team in the history of the NFL to garner two running backs with more than 1,100 yards rushing in the same season.
The 2012 season showed Chryst's strengths and expertise as the teams quarterbacks coach in captializing on the strengths of the starting quarterback. Midway through the season, Kaepernick was named the teams starter. Chryst's quarterback duo of Kaepernick and Alex Smith, tied for the fewest interceptions in the NFL (8), ranked 4th in quarterback rating (101.2), and 4th in completion percentage (66.3).
![]()
Originally posted by VaBeachNiner:agree,, ck was a huge reason for the loss.. you can not ignore this
Originally posted by Baldie:
Originally posted by verb1der:
ROMAN HAS BEEN FIGURED OUT WITH HIS WACK ASS COLLEGE SCHEME, IT'S TIME GETS THE BOOT!
JOHN HARBAUGH FIRED HIS OC AND THEN WENT ON TO WIN THE SUPERBOWL, HAVE SOME BALLS JIM!
FREE CK!!!!!!!!!!!
Firing Roman won't help, Harbaugh still has his say on what he wants on offense. He'll just find someone else that agrees with him.
CK was free and look what happened.
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by VaBeachNiner:agree,, ck was a huge reason for the loss.. you can not ignore this
Originally posted by Baldie:
+ Show all quotes
Firing Roman won't help, Harbaugh still has his say on what he wants on offense. He'll just find someone else that agrees with him.
CK was free and look what happened.
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by Baldie:
Firing Roman won't help, Harbaugh still has his say on what he wants on offense. He'll just find someone else that agrees with him.
This. Make no mistake about it, this is the offense that Jim wants, this is the offense he approves of and played in.. The worst part about Harbaugh is that he's dogmatically attached to this offense because of his own personal beliefs and loyalties, fire Roman, bring in whoever you want, this will still be a very conservative, "go for the safe points" sort of offense with a 1970's era passing philosophy.
Good enough to get you to the playoffs and just good enough to get you beat sooner or later when you get there.
Spot...freaking...on!
Originally posted by verb1der:
WE GOT ALL THESE WIDE RECEIVERS AND HE'S STILL LINING BRUCE MILLER UP AT WR WTF IS THAT HE MUST BE TROLLING ALL OF US!!!!!!!!!!!
HAVE SOME BALLS JIM AND DO IT!!!
Originally posted by NinerGM:
Originally posted by jonnydel:
Well, I can only speak to what I saw on film from the Chicago game last week(I did scout out chicago) and honestly, I probably would've called a similar game to what Roman did. When you look at the film from their game against the Bills, Chicago was terrible against the read option. Jared Allen looked overmatched against QB runs, Lance Briggs looked like he was trying to be a hero against the read option as well, overall, they gave up a lot of yards off the read-option - sometimes to the QB or to the RB.
When you see that kind of thing on film - you would be an idiot not to try and take advantage. Also, that's the only real film you have to go off of and the Bills ran so much out of that set that you didn't see how well Chicago played against much else.
I don't blame Roman for the read-option, or a lot of the pass calls. The fact is, the players have to execute. I'm sure when I go to look at the film tomorrow that what I'll see is horrendously sloppy play, poor attention to the little things and tons of missed opportunities.
This loss stung me harder than any regular season loss has that I can remember - so I'm not saying this to defend or ease anyone. I'm more irritated with the players than the coaches right now, they're paid huge money that comes from us fans buying tickets, merchandise, and watching these games, they need to play like it. You get paid for two halves of football - not one, if you want a vacation or to take off work early on Sunday, go work somewhere else.....
johnny I think you're right and this is absolutely true. Scout the opponent and create a game plan based on it. My only problem is when it's clear they've scouted your tendencies, adjustments have to be made. After the first read-option fumble and tackles for loss, we were STILL running it. That's my problem. You're correct players have to execute - like Boone's whiff on 3rd and 1 and Millers and Iupati's misses on run blocking, etc. I agree players must execute but when the entire TEAM isn't executing, that's a higher level thing for me, that's a coaching issue. I'm irritated with both players and coaches but IMHO, one person not performing vs a whole department are two different things. If a department is performing poorly, I'm coming after a manager.
Originally posted by verb1der:True, but, at the same point you can't expect someone to just all of the sudden be better at something because they were bad at it the week before. If they had a repeated pattern from weeks of film that you could look at and say, "well that was an anomaly" instead of one week of "turrible" than yes, I would say it is foolish. However, even up to Ck's fumble, we still had 4-5 yards gained on that play and Gore was running well, it's not like it wasn't working, CK has to hold onto the ball on a run - it's that simple. After that, I'd have to look at the film for his final 2 picks, but we were running the ball well out of the read-option, not like the Bills were, but it was having a degree of success. Also, the running game is something that you HAVE to be patient with. You cannot set up a run-heavy game plan and decide after the first half - with a 10 point lead, that you're going to abandon it or go in a different direction.
Originally posted by NinerGM:
Originally posted by jonnydel:
Well, I can only speak to what I saw on film from the Chicago game last week(I did scout out chicago) and honestly, I probably would've called a similar game to what Roman did. When you look at the film from their game against the Bills, Chicago was terrible against the read option. Jared Allen looked overmatched against QB runs, Lance Briggs looked like he was trying to be a hero against the read option as well, overall, they gave up a lot of yards off the read-option - sometimes to the QB or to the RB.
When you see that kind of thing on film - you would be an idiot not to try and take advantage. Also, that's the only real film you have to go off of and the Bills ran so much out of that set that you didn't see how well Chicago played against much else.
I don't blame Roman for the read-option, or a lot of the pass calls. The fact is, the players have to execute. I'm sure when I go to look at the film tomorrow that what I'll see is horrendously sloppy play, poor attention to the little things and tons of missed opportunities.
This loss stung me harder than any regular season loss has that I can remember - so I'm not saying this to defend or ease anyone. I'm more irritated with the players than the coaches right now, they're paid huge money that comes from us fans buying tickets, merchandise, and watching these games, they need to play like it. You get paid for two halves of football - not one, if you want a vacation or to take off work early on Sunday, go work somewhere else.....
johnny I think you're right and this is absolutely true. Scout the opponent and create a game plan based on it. My only problem is when it's clear they've scouted your tendencies, adjustments have to be made. After the first read-option fumble and tackles for loss, we were STILL running it. That's my problem. You're correct players have to execute - like Boone's whiff on 3rd and 1 and Millers and Iupati's misses on run blocking, etc. I agree players must execute but when the entire TEAM isn't executing, that's a higher level thing for me, that's a coaching issue. I'm irritated with both players and coaches but IMHO, one person not performing vs a whole department are two different things. If a department is performing poorly, I'm coming after a manager.
Both of you make solid points.
I'd also like to add that if you were Roman, wouldn't you give the Bears defense the benefit of the doubt and say to yourself "they will probably clean this up and be more prepared for this so maybe we should have this as a plan B." Don't tell me just because the Bills had success that you expect to have the same success and force your will in trying to achieve it. That's just plain stupid.
Originally posted by jonnydel:
Originally posted by verb1der:True, but, at the same point you can't expect someone to just all of the sudden be better at something because they were bad at it the week before. If they had a repeated pattern from weeks of film that you could look at and say, "well that was an anomaly" instead of one week of "turrible" than yes, I would say it is foolish. However, even up to Ck's fumble, we still had 4-5 yards gained on that play and Gore was running well, it's not like it wasn't working, CK has to hold onto the ball on a run - it's that simple. After that, I'd have to look at the film for his final 2 picks, but we were running the ball well out of the read-option, not like the Bills were, but it was having a degree of success. Also, the running game is something that you HAVE to be patient with. You cannot set up a run-heavy game plan and decide after the first half - with a 10 point lead, that you're going to abandon it or go in a different direction.
Originally posted by NinerGM:
+ Show all quotes
johnny I think you're right and this is absolutely true. Scout the opponent and create a game plan based on it. My only problem is when it's clear they've scouted your tendencies, adjustments have to be made. After the first read-option fumble and tackles for loss, we were STILL running it. That's my problem. You're correct players have to execute - like Boone's whiff on 3rd and 1 and Millers and Iupati's misses on run blocking, etc. I agree players must execute but when the entire TEAM isn't executing, that's a higher level thing for me, that's a coaching issue. I'm irritated with both players and coaches but IMHO, one person not performing vs a whole department are two different things. If a department is performing poorly, I'm coming after a manager.
Both of you make solid points.
I'd also like to add that if you were Roman, wouldn't you give the Bears defense the benefit of the doubt and say to yourself "they will probably clean this up and be more prepared for this so maybe we should have this as a plan B." Don't tell me just because the Bills had success that you expect to have the same success and force your will in trying to achieve it. That's just plain stupid.
It sounds like we want to blame Roman for players getting called for penalties as well. Was it a systemic breakdown? Yes. Can we lay it at the coaches feet? I don't think so. Can we lay some of it at their feet? Yes. But, emotion colors everything, especially after a visceral loss. This was a game that was like 8 things all went wrong for us, but, if only 7 go wrong for us we still win.
There were phantom penalties, real penalties, miscues on the O-line, a quarterback collapse, and some bad coaching calls.
If you were Roman, what would you have done differently? Would you call more 3 WR set passes? Run more I-formation runs? WR screens? I'm just looking for input, because, from where I stand right now, I can't see much of what they could've done differently, from a coaching standpoint.
How do you as a coach, during a game, correct penalties occuring at a rate you've never experienced before with a team? How do you make your QB throw a ball more accurately during a game in which he's off? His two late INT's were the right read from what I saw during the game, they were just BAD throws.
The biggest fail I saw from the coaching wasn't on the offensive side of the ball. It was on the defensive. How Vic Fangio did not make some sort of adjustment to Brandon Marshall in the endzone is beyond me. They put Marshall in the slot every freaking time. He's 6'5" against a 5'11" Rookie. To me, you have to change something up there. You either have to put a LB on him underneath so give Ward some help, or a Safety on the inside to help Ward maintain some outside leverage, or a better option, put Culliver on him. Culliver is a couple inches taller than Ward and it would've been a better matchup. Do something different. 3 TD's to the same guy, all in the red zone is ridiculous.