Originally posted by crake49:
Come on, Lisa. The Seahawks had a huge dose of Marshawn and an even bigger dose of luck. That two-point conversion?? COME ON! Wilson has got to be the luckiest QB in the league. The guy goes 1-7 with three ints and a rating of ZERO in the first half and he ends up the winning QB. Unbelievable.
On a very basic level, the team that wins the game is the better team. But all this does is reinforce one of my most basic observations about the NFL - that every year, luck plays an extremely important part in the outcome. The Seahawks got real lucky.
I didn't mention anything about luck but, yes, I'll grant you that some breaks occurred.
I was merely pointing out that, despite the Hawks poor play for most of the game, besides actually winning it (luck or not) they ended up on the better side of the stat ledger in most categories. That can't be disputed. How much credence the stats have in determining "the better team", I suppose, can be.
As for Russell . . .
he ended up the winning QB because of how he and his team performed in the last NINE minutes, over-comming their horrendous play in the first FIFTY-FIVE.