Originally posted by theduke85:
I think Niners fans put too much stock in this stat. Montana's career wasn't 4 years long. He lost plenty of times in the playoffs which prevented him from losing the Super Bowl in the first place. A playoff loss is a playoff loss, I don't see why people put so much emphasis on losing in the Super Bowl. Is losing in the NFCCG somehow more forgivable than losing in the SB? To me it's worse. It's an even bigger failure.
Brady is 18-8 in the playoffs (.692 winning percentage). Montana was 16-7 in the playoffs (.615 winning percentage). If Brady retires with as many Super Bowls are Montana, I might put him ahead in my book. It's tough to admit, but I'm trying to be objective (which, let's face it, is something a good chunk of the Webzone is not good at).
This is though one because I really,
really want Joe to remain the GOAT.
But it's time for some honesty here. Winning a Super Bowl is not that impressive once you're already in the Super Bowl. Statistically it's a 50/50 proposal. But to get to the Super Bowl, on the other hand, is an insanely hard thing to do. Therefore winning a Super Bowl is only marginally more impressive than making it to the Super Bowl.
Therefore, and I know I'm gonna get killed for this, even if Brady lose this week-end, he's still the true GOAT. Because according to what I just wrote in the previous paragraph, going 3-3 is not only better than going 4-0. It's immensely better.
[ Edited by Draelmar on Jan 29, 2015 at 8:24 PM ]