There are 297 users in the forums

******* Superbowl XLIX GAMEDAY THREAD ********

Shop 49ers game tickets
Originally posted by ram29jackson:
Originally posted by phatbutskinny:
i hope so. but don't let your hate cloud your intelligence. The seahawks are a great team (albeit a little lucky) and their defense will keep them in it


what hate ? I'm completely impartial. If I knew the Seahawks were winning, I would say so. It has nothing to do with hope.

You knew the Hawks weren't going to beat the Packers and you did say so.

And you went 0-4 the week prior as well.

At least this week you have a 50/50 chance of being right!! It's looking good for you.
Originally posted by RedAlice:
You knew the Hawks weren't going to beat the Packers and you did say so.

And you went 0-4 the week prior as well.

At least this week you have a 50/50 chance of being right!! It's looking good for you.

see,you don't understand intelligent logic. I was right all the way. what fool is supposed to believe Seattle beat GB naturally. A guy cant hit the side of a barn for 58 minutes and gets lucky on his last 3 chucks while a GB player acts like his hands are asleep? I am not wrong about games being staged,only the outcome of staged games.
Originally posted by ram29jackson:
Originally posted by RedAlice:
You knew the Hawks weren't going to beat the Packers and you did say so.

And you went 0-4 the week prior as well.

At least this week you have a 50/50 chance of being right!! It's looking good for you.

see,you don't understand intelligent logic. I was right all the way. what fool is supposed to believe Seattle beat GB naturally. A guy cant hit the side of a barn for 58 minutes and gets lucky on his last 3 chucks while a GB player acts like his hands are asleep? I am not wrong about games being staged,only the outcome of staged games.

so what you do is make predictions on games, state them as facts and if the result goes the other way just say the game was staged and i had the wrong pre-determined outcome? doesnt sound intelligent, sounds like you're looking to be the smartest guy in the room and just cover yourself from both sides.
Originally posted by crabman82:
so what you do is make predictions on games, state them as facts and if the result goes the other way just say the game was staged and i had the wrong pre-determined outcome? doesnt sound intelligent, sounds like you're looking to be the smartest guy in the room and just cover yourself from both sides.


LOL I just said they're staged no matter the outcome. You need to take a logic class because something really basic just went over your head.
Originally posted by ram29jackson:
Originally posted by crabman82:
so what you do is make predictions on games, state them as facts and if the result goes the other way just say the game was staged and i had the wrong pre-determined outcome? doesnt sound intelligent, sounds like you're looking to be the smartest guy in the room and just cover yourself from both sides.


LOL I just said they're staged no matter the outcome. You need to take a logic class because something really basic just went over your head.

so you go into it knowing they're staged, attempt to choose a winner, the other team wins the game and somehow you're not wrong? if you know they're staged how come you cant pick the right winner? staged or not you analyze a game (the teams, the whether, the location, the injuries, the current state of how the teams are playing etc) and pick a winner and you've somehow missed on most of them. but yet still try to claim to be right?
Originally posted by crabman82:
so you go into it knowing they're staged, attempt to choose a winner, the other team wins the game and somehow you're not wrong? if you know they're staged how come you cant pick the right winner? staged or not you analyze a game (the teams, the whether, the location, the injuries, the current state of how the teams are playing etc) and pick a winner and you've somehow missed on most of them. but yet still try to claim to be right?

who wins is unimportant. How it plays out unrealistically is the issue. They know how to bring the drama.
Originally posted by ram29jackson:
Originally posted by crabman82:
so you go into it knowing they're staged, attempt to choose a winner, the other team wins the game and somehow you're not wrong? if you know they're staged how come you cant pick the right winner? staged or not you analyze a game (the teams, the whether, the location, the injuries, the current state of how the teams are playing etc) and pick a winner and you've somehow missed on most of them. but yet still try to claim to be right?

who wins is unimportant. How it plays out unrealistically is the issue. They know how to bring the drama.

real rich coming from the guy back in september writing teams off as having no chance. if who wins is un-important, why so heavy on the predictions? i've gone back and read a handful of your posts from sept/oct about who was going somewhere and who was done, and most of the time you have been wrong. if you think its staged and pre-determined like wwe thats fine, i'm not here to take that away from you, just noting that i've been paying attention to who you've said was done and who wasnt and you've been wrong a lot. for someone so convinced that its staged i just expect a better win % than you've got.
My favorite prediction so far....well either it's going to be close or a blow out...

Wait what?!?
I was on a Seattle bus this morning, and the driver tried to get the "Sea" "Hawks" chant going. Gives new meaning to the term "bandwagon."

At 6:30am, the 12s sure didn't seem very peppy. Thanks for sparing me, Seahawk fans.
[ Edited by VinculumJuris on Jan 20, 2015 at 3:07 PM ]
Originally posted by zaghawk:
My favorite prediction so far....well either it's going to be close or a blow out...

Wait what?!?

It will be close game. And if it's not a close game, I definitely predict a blow out!
Not hard to understand, if you know the other person understands it, but doesn't understand it as well!
Wait.. what?

I have Seattle 17-14.
Reasons:
1) I think Wilson laid his bad egg already. He'll be that QB that played Denver in the SB last year, and convert 3rd downs. This was one of my keys to the SB last year.

*changes if Revis is able to lock down one of Seattle's "pedestrian" WR's. Leaving the other doubled and Wilson has 3rd and long

2) Brady hasn't seen this type of defense. Detroit was good, but Detroit with Stafford suck in the cold when they played in NE. I expect a close game like NYJ vs NE games this year. Seattle''s D coordinator is not as good as Rex Ryan, but he has the better personal to do the same.
NE's O line has been playing well of late, but Seattle's DE speed combined with their secondary will give Brady trouble.

*changes if Blount averages around 5 a clip and can get Brady into 3rd and short

3) NFC west bred physicality vs AFC. I give it to the NFC west

4) Gronk will get hit by Kam hard. If that doesn't work, Kam will hit him in the knees hard.

5) I'm 4-2 in the playoffs the last 2 weeks. Damn you Denver for losing and GB not covering the spread against Dallas, -5.5. Convert that 2 point conversion.

By the way, I don't know what I'm talking about as of now, cuz we still have 2 more weeks.
Originally posted by VinculumJuris:
I was on a Seattle bus this morning, and the driver tried to get the "Sea" "Hawks" chant going. Gives new meaning to the term "bandwagon."

At 6:30am, the 12s sure didn't seem very peppy. Thanks for sparing me, Seahawk fans.

The people on the bus probably don't know who the Seahawks are.
Originally posted by FunkNinerFlex:
Originally posted by zaghawk:
My favorite prediction so far....well either it's going to be close or a blow out...

Wait what?!?

It will be close game. And if it's not a close game, I definitely predict a blow out!
Not hard to understand, if you know the other person understands it, but doesn't understand it as well!
Wait.. what?

I have Seattle 17-14.
Reasons:
1) I think Wilson laid his bad egg already. He'll be that QB that played Denver in the SB last year, and convert 3rd downs. This was one of my keys to the SB last year.

*changes if Revis is able to lock down one of Seattle's "pedestrian" WR's. Leaving the other doubled and Wilson has 3rd and long

2) Brady hasn't seen this type of defense. Detroit was good, but Detroit with Stafford suck in the cold when they played in NE. I expect a close game like NYJ vs NE games this year. Seattle''s D coordinator is not as good as Rex Ryan, but he has the better personal to do the same.
NE's O line has been playing well of late, but Seattle's DE speed combined with their secondary will give Brady trouble.

*changes if Blount averages around 5 a clip and can get Brady into 3rd and short

3) NFC west bred physicality vs AFC. I give it to the NFC west

4) Gronk will get hit by Kam hard. If that doesn't work, Kam will hit him in the knees hard.

5) I'm 4-2 in the playoffs the last 2 weeks. Damn you Denver for losing and GB not covering the spread against Dallas, -5.5. Convert that 2 point conversion.

By the way, I don't know what I'm talking about as of now, cuz we still have 2 more weeks.

If this defense doesn't pick up the pass rush Brady will torch them with all of his weapons. It was non-existent against Green Bay and had Rodgers had a better day in the accuracy department we'd be talking NE vs. GB right now. Rodgers missed a number of gimme throws. Think about the guys they lost in their d-line rotation --- Bryant, Clemons, McDonald, Mebane, Hill...

Seattle may just have to blitz -- how does Brady do against the blitz?
[ Edited by fortyninerglory on Jan 20, 2015 at 3:42 PM ]
Originally posted by fortyninerglory:
If this defense doesn't pick up the pass rush Brady will torch them with all of his weapons. It was non-existent against Green Bay and had Rodgers had a better day in the accuracy department we'd be talking NE vs. GB right now. Rodgers missed a number of gimme throws. Think about the guys they lost in their d-line rotation --- Bryant, Clemons, McDonald, Mebane, Hill...

Seattle may just have to blitz -- how does Brady do against the blitz?

Of course, Brady will kill blitzes a majority of the time. I think Bennett and Avril will play better next Sunday.
I don't see a double digit win either way though.
  • jrg
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 166,549
Seattle is going to win the SB. That's the hypothesis. If they lose, then I guess I'll watch the replay at a later date.

Meanwhile the 49ers are getting ready to hoist SB L...with this amazing coaching staff. It's a blessing to be a fan of the 49ers at this stage
Search Share 49ersWebzone