Originally posted by Niners99:
Originally posted by 4everFaithful:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Allx9er:
Only reason why this thread is 30 + pages is neither has done enough to seperate themselves
One's a starter the other is not coming back at his current salary...his not starter quality and hasn't been for a while.
http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/2773/deangelo-hall
CSN Mid-Atlantic's Tarik El-Bashir believes DeAngelo Hall could open 2016 as a starter at safety for the Redskins.
Hall performed well after making the switch to safety late last season, and an offseason working at the position will only make him more comfortable. Coach Jay Gruden said he think Hall will "solidify himself as one of the top safeties in the league." The spot next to Hall remains an open question. Dashon Goldson is unlikely to return at his current $8 million cap hit, and he is not starter quality at this point in his career anyway. The Redskins should address the position in free agency or the draft. Feb 20 - 9:44 AM
Source: CSN Washington
The reason it's 30 plus pages is because you have the same people that always hate on every player on SF commenting on it OR the same people hating on every single player Baalke has drafted...that's basically what this thread and many others have turned into... its pretty old and stale IMO.
If someone can't honestly see Reid is a better safety overall than Goldston then hey aren't being objective and have other motives.
If you watched Goldson at all this season, youd slap yourself
PFF watched more Goldson than you did, and said he was horrible last year.
You're not only calling yourself a better NFL scout than PFF, but youre saying PFF knows nothing about football. Is that really the stance you want to take?
No, im not denying PFF is a viable statistic, what im saying is, PFF is unreliable if used as THE only source of your argument... you cannot only look at PFF, but not watch the player, ignore his tackles, INTS, and passes deflected as if theyre pointles...
Do you really believe that scouts only use PFF and nothing else?? You dont think they watch the player with their own eyes? Or view other statistics? PFF is very flawed if used as your only tool, you have to take other factors in account as well.. cant just use the same argument over and over... "he sucks at coverage, here is the PFF".. when a majorirty of you bashing Goldson didnt even take the time to watch him this yr...
I played in a IDP fantasy league this yr where I had Goldson on my team, this dude was one of the highest scoring Safties in fantasy this league.. now im aware that doesnt mean he was good in coverage, but it does speak on belhalf of his playmaking ability.. he racked me up an average of 8 tackles a game, got and INT or a TD here and there, forced some fumbles.. hes not as bad as many of you claim.. and Reid has a lot to prove before I claim he was ever better than Goldson in his prime let alone even today
