[ Edited by tjd808185 on Feb 20, 2020 at 6:02 AM ]
There are 315 users in the forums
Jacksonville Jaguar Arik Armstead-DT Thread
Feb 20, 2020 at 5:18 AM
- tjd808185
- Veteran
- Posts: 26,068
Kittle shouldn't be too expensive as a tight end. The team just needs Paraag to work a little magic this year then when the cba rises the cap we'll get Buckner/ Kittle extended.
Feb 20, 2020 at 10:57 AM
- okdkid
- Veteran
- Posts: 23,271
The salary cap is going to be $30M-40M *higher* in the next two years.
Why would anybody care that we sign 2-3 huge deals this offseason? In fact, I wish we could sign more, before the new salary cap is reflected in these deals.
Armstead
Buckner
Kittle
Ward
Sanders
Warner (I wish he was eligible)
DJ Jones
Tartt
Tomlinson
All deserving of new deals, if not this offseason, then next. ALL can easily be done with the cap set to explode the way it will with the new CBA.
Why would anybody care that we sign 2-3 huge deals this offseason? In fact, I wish we could sign more, before the new salary cap is reflected in these deals.
Armstead
Buckner
Kittle
Ward
Sanders
Warner (I wish he was eligible)
DJ Jones
Tartt
Tomlinson
All deserving of new deals, if not this offseason, then next. ALL can easily be done with the cap set to explode the way it will with the new CBA.
[ Edited by okdkid on Feb 20, 2020 at 10:57 AM ]
Feb 20, 2020 at 12:01 PM
- btthepunk
- Veteran
- Posts: 22,992
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by tjd808185:Kittle shouldn't be too expensive as a tight end. The team just needs Paraag to work a little magic this year then when the cba rises the cap we'll get Buckner/ Kittle extended.
I'm thinking Kittle gets $13M-$15M per. Hopefully at least 5 years.
Feb 20, 2020 at 3:00 PM
- Phoenix49ers
- Moderator
- Posts: 123,833
Originally posted by SisterFister:
I've been thinking about AA all day. As much as I would like to keep him, I think the best option for the team is to move on. His market is going to be expensive. Some will argue there are ways to manipulate the cap. I don't doubt that. What I do know is we have 2 large extensions to players better than Armstead. Kittle and Buckner. One thing to keep in mind with AA is he will somewhat set a market for Buckner. Since Buckner is without a doubt a much better player than AA, Buckner will be licking his chops if the 49ers commit a long term deal with AA in the annual range of 16-18 million a year.
The best move for the team imo is to tag and trade Armstead. Do what the Texans did with Clowney and Chiefs did with Ford.
We know the team is short on draft picks this year. Many have suggested a trade out of the 1st to recoup extra picks. The problem with this strategy is we do not know who will be available when the 49ers draft. This class is deep at WR and OL. And there are some good QBs in this class making it all the more likely a player whom the 9ers covet will be there at 31. I think it would be foolish for them to dismiss the pick entirely in hope for a trade down.
So how can the 49ers come away with more picks and still have a formidable defensive line next year? I think the answer is to trade Armstead. The next question would be what is Armsteads worth? Given his production, his age, and his ability to play anywhere on the line. This is how I see it.
10-15% the 49ers can get a late 1st
55-65% the 49ers can get an early 2nd
70-90% the 49ers can get a late 2nd
100% the 49ers can get a 3rd and a 4th
Any of these options are better to me than letting AA walk completely and getting a 3rd round comp next year, or, tagging him this year and letting him walk in 2021 and receiving a 3rd rounder in 2022. Or signing him to a massive extension at 16-18 million annually for 5-6 years.
Assuming we can tag and trade AA, which in my opinion seems highly likely given his value and the need at the position. What are the 49ers options to replace him?1. Solomon Thomas. Trust me, I'm not excited about this anymore than you are. However there are some things to note. Pff has generally liked Thomas as a run defender whether inside or out. We know he plays better as a pass rusher on the inside. His cap hit is 8.9 million and it's been rumored the 49ers might have to attach a pick to trade him to save roughly 4 million on the cap while still being responsible for the other 4 million. That doesn't seem wise to me. The question for the coaches is pretty simple.
On running downs is a line of
Bucker/Thomas/DJ Jones/Bosa or
Thomas/Buckner/Jones/Bosa
And on passing downs
Ford/Buckner/Thomas/Bosa
A significant detriment to the defensive line as a whole unit? With these units Thomas will have much of the 1 on 1 opportunities Armstead had inside this year. While I'm certainly not convinced Thomas is nearly as good as AA, Thomas will have plenty of opportunities in both the run game and passing game to beat interior 1 on 1 matchups.
One important note in all of this is Armstead was virtually a non factor in his first 4 years in the league. Flip through this thread and you can see the majority of the posts are scrutinizing his play. It wasn't until Ford and Bosa came along that AA was able to flourish. Could Thomas be on a similar path to success? I think he has a great opportunity to do so. And his cap hit of 8.9 million will be the difference in being able to resign Ward or Sanders, possibly both, instead of paying Armstead.
2. Free agency
I started browsing through potential 4-3 DT's on Walter football and a couple players stood out to me as guys the 49ers could bring in on short term deals that could flourish with Buckner, Jones, Ford, and Bosa. Given age, injury history, and previous salaries these players aren't neccesarily getting long term deals except maybe Jefferson, he is only 26.
1. Michael Brockers
2. Quinten Jefferson
3. Ndamukong Suh
4. Timmy Jernigan
5. Shelby Harris
I'm not arguing for any one person or what type of deal they should get. Only saying the 49ers may have options in free agency to bring in a solid veteran player at a cheaper price tag than AA.
3. The draft
There could be a possible replacement for AA in the draft. With other needs on the team, specifically at WR, OL, and in the secondary, and without 2nd-3rd-4th round picks, it seems unlikely. Even if the 49ers trade out.
Tag/sign and trade AA. Get what you can in draft capital. Focus on extending our true franchise players. The cap will certainly go up but it is of the upmost importance to remain cap flexible more than ever to continue being competitive. Sacrifices must be made and Armstead is a cap casualty.
Or they just keep Armstead and keep together the best part of this 49ers team that had an incredibly successful season. The team finally had a great season and it seems odd to me that people are trying to come up with ways to take the team apart.
Feb 20, 2020 at 3:23 PM
- DaBeegDeek
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,801
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:Originally posted by SisterFister:I've been thinking about AA all day. As much as I would like to keep him, I think the best option for the team is to move on. His market is going to be expensive. Some will argue there are ways to manipulate the cap. I don't doubt that. What I do know is we have 2 large extensions to players better than Armstead. Kittle and Buckner. One thing to keep in mind with AA is he will somewhat set a market for Buckner. Since Buckner is without a doubt a much better player than AA, Buckner will be licking his chops if the 49ers commit a long term deal with AA in the annual range of 16-18 million a year.
The best move for the team imo is to tag and trade Armstead. Do what the Texans did with Clowney and Chiefs did with Ford.
We know the team is short on draft picks this year. Many have suggested a trade out of the 1st to recoup extra picks. The problem with this strategy is we do not know who will be available when the 49ers draft. This class is deep at WR and OL. And there are some good QBs in this class making it all the more likely a player whom the 9ers covet will be there at 31. I think it would be foolish for them to dismiss the pick entirely in hope for a trade down.
So how can the 49ers come away with more picks and still have a formidable defensive line next year? I think the answer is to trade Armstead. The next question would be what is Armsteads worth? Given his production, his age, and his ability to play anywhere on the line. This is how I see it.
10-15% the 49ers can get a late 1st
55-65% the 49ers can get an early 2nd
70-90% the 49ers can get a late 2nd
100% the 49ers can get a 3rd and a 4th
Any of these options are better to me than letting AA walk completely and getting a 3rd round comp next year, or, tagging him this year and letting him walk in 2021 and receiving a 3rd rounder in 2022. Or signing him to a massive extension at 16-18 million annually for 5-6 years.
Assuming we can tag and trade AA, which in my opinion seems highly likely given his value and the need at the position. What are the 49ers options to replace him?1. Solomon Thomas. Trust me, I'm not excited about this anymore than you are. However there are some things to note. Pff has generally liked Thomas as a run defender whether inside or out. We know he plays better as a pass rusher on the inside. His cap hit is 8.9 million and it's been rumored the 49ers might have to attach a pick to trade him to save roughly 4 million on the cap while still being responsible for the other 4 million. That doesn't seem wise to me. The question for the coaches is pretty simple.
On running downs is a line of
Bucker/Thomas/DJ Jones/Bosa or
Thomas/Buckner/Jones/Bosa
And on passing downs
Ford/Buckner/Thomas/Bosa
A significant detriment to the defensive line as a whole unit? With these units Thomas will have much of the 1 on 1 opportunities Armstead had inside this year. While I'm certainly not convinced Thomas is nearly as good as AA, Thomas will have plenty of opportunities in both the run game and passing game to beat interior 1 on 1 matchups.
One important note in all of this is Armstead was virtually a non factor in his first 4 years in the league. Flip through this thread and you can see the majority of the posts are scrutinizing his play. It wasn't until Ford and Bosa came along that AA was able to flourish. Could Thomas be on a similar path to success? I think he has a great opportunity to do so. And his cap hit of 8.9 million will be the difference in being able to resign Ward or Sanders, possibly both, instead of paying Armstead.
2. Free agency
I started browsing through potential 4-3 DT's on Walter football and a couple players stood out to me as guys the 49ers could bring in on short term deals that could flourish with Buckner, Jones, Ford, and Bosa. Given age, injury history, and previous salaries these players aren't neccesarily getting long term deals except maybe Jefferson, he is only 26.
1. Michael Brockers
2. Quinten Jefferson
3. Ndamukong Suh
4. Timmy Jernigan
5. Shelby Harris
I'm not arguing for any one person or what type of deal they should get. Only saying the 49ers may have options in free agency to bring in a solid veteran player at a cheaper price tag than AA.
3. The draft
There could be a possible replacement for AA in the draft. With other needs on the team, specifically at WR, OL, and in the secondary, and without 2nd-3rd-4th round picks, it seems unlikely. Even if the 49ers trade out.
Tag/sign and trade AA. Get what you can in draft capital. Focus on extending our true franchise players. The cap will certainly go up but it is of the upmost importance to remain cap flexible more than ever to continue being competitive. Sacrifices must be made and Armstead is a cap casualty.
Or they just keep Armstead and keep together the best part of this 49ers team that had an incredibly successful season. The team finally had a great season and it seems odd to me that people are trying to come up with ways to take the team apart.
+1,000
People are trying WAY too hard to find issues with our squad. Our defensive line was outstanding, and that was with two major contributors hurt for the playoffs and a former top 3 pick not living up to his potential. Resign this man, don't over think it.
Feb 20, 2020 at 3:32 PM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 112,064
Originally posted by okdkid:The salary cap is going to be $30M-40M *higher* in the next two years.
Why would anybody care that we sign 2-3 huge deals this offseason? In fact, I wish we could sign more, before the new salary cap is reflected in these deals.
Armstead
Buckner
Kittle
Ward
Sanders
Warner (I wish he was eligible)
DJ Jones
Tartt
Tomlinson
All deserving of new deals, if not this offseason, then next. ALL can easily be done with the cap set to explode the way it will with the new CBA.
You damn well know paraag has this all figured out
Toss in contracts like Ford, who can easily be moved off of after this yr. just structure AA's contact to reflect SF cutting Ford in 2021...if Ford somehow gets healthy and balls out, just restructure his deal next yr.
Feb 20, 2020 at 6:13 PM
- brodiebluebanaszak
- Veteran
- Posts: 14,387
Originally posted by SisterFister:I've been thinking about AA all day. As much as I would like to keep him, I think the best option for the team is to move on. His market is going to be expensive. Some will argue there are ways to manipulate the cap. I don't doubt that. What I do know is we have 2 large extensions to players better than Armstead. Kittle and Buckner. One thing to keep in mind with AA is he will somewhat set a market for Buckner. Since Buckner is without a doubt a much better player than AA, Buckner will be licking his chops if the 49ers commit a long term deal with AA in the annual range of 16-18 million a year.
The best move for the team imo is to tag and trade Armstead. Do what the Texans did with Clowney and Chiefs did with Ford.
We know the team is short on draft picks this year. Many have suggested a trade out of the 1st to recoup extra picks. The problem with this strategy is we do not know who will be available when the 49ers draft. This class is deep at WR and OL. And there are some good QBs in this class making it all the more likely a player whom the 9ers covet will be there at 31. I think it would be foolish for them to dismiss the pick entirely in hope for a trade down.
So how can the 49ers come away with more picks and still have a formidable defensive line next year? I think the answer is to trade Armstead. The next question would be what is Armsteads worth? Given his production, his age, and his ability to play anywhere on the line. This is how I see it.
10-15% the 49ers can get a late 1st
55-65% the 49ers can get an early 2nd
70-90% the 49ers can get a late 2nd
100% the 49ers can get a 3rd and a 4th
Any of these options are better to me than letting AA walk completely and getting a 3rd round comp next year, or, tagging him this year and letting him walk in 2021 and receiving a 3rd rounder in 2022. Or signing him to a massive extension at 16-18 million annually for 5-6 years.
Assuming we can tag and trade AA, which in my opinion seems highly likely given his value and the need at the position. What are the 49ers options to replace him?
1. Solomon Thomas. Trust me, I'm not excited about this anymore than you are. However there are some things to note. Pff has generally liked Thomas as a run defender whether inside or out. We know he plays better as a pass rusher on the inside. His cap hit is 8.9 million and it's been rumored the 49ers might have to attach a pick to trade him to save roughly 4 million on the cap while still being responsible for the other 4 million. That doesn't seem wise to me. The question for the coaches is pretty simple.
On running downs is a line of
Bucker/Thomas/DJ Jones/Bosa or
Thomas/Buckner/Jones/Bosa
And on passing downs
Ford/Buckner/Thomas/Bosa
A significant detriment to the defensive line as a whole unit? With these units Thomas will have much of the 1 on 1 opportunities Armstead had inside this year. While I'm certainly not convinced Thomas is nearly as good as AA, Thomas will have plenty of opportunities in both the run game and passing game to beat interior 1 on 1 matchups.
One important note in all of this is Armstead was virtually a non factor in his first 4 years in the league. Flip through this thread and you can see the majority of the posts are scrutinizing his play. It wasn't until Ford and Bosa came along that AA was able to flourish. Could Thomas be on a similar path to success? I think he has a great opportunity to do so. And his cap hit of 8.9 million will be the difference in being able to resign Ward or Sanders, possibly both, instead of paying Armstead.
2. Free agency
I started browsing through potential 4-3 DT's on Walter football and a couple players stood out to me as guys the 49ers could bring in on short term deals that could flourish with Buckner, Jones, Ford, and Bosa. Given age, injury history, and previous salaries these players aren't neccesarily getting long term deals except maybe Jefferson, he is only 26.
1. Michael Brockers
2. Quinten Jefferson
3. Ndamukong Suh
4. Timmy Jernigan
5. Shelby Harris
I'm not arguing for any one person or what type of deal they should get. Only saying the 49ers may have options in free agency to bring in a solid veteran player at a cheaper price tag than AA.
3. The draft
There could be a possible replacement for AA in the draft. With other needs on the team, specifically at WR, OL, and in the secondary, and without 2nd-3rd-4th round picks, it seems unlikely. Even if the 49ers trade out.
Tag/sign and trade AA. Get what you can in draft capital. Focus on extending our true franchise players. The cap will certainly go up but it is of the upmost importance to remain cap flexible more than ever to continue being competitive. Sacrifices must be made and Armstead is a cap casualty.
Is armstead the odd man out or Ford? Hes more expensive than Armstead and he didnt really help us after november. He had 8 weeks of rest and didnt really influence the super bowl. Thats sobering. We cant invest 17m for 230 snaps. Just cant do it. There has to be a game plan to keep him high functioning next year. Or he needs to restructure big time. And theres our cap room to sign armstead.
Feb 20, 2020 at 9:58 PM
- SisterFister
- Veteran
- Posts: 777
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:Is armstead the odd man out or Ford? Hes more expensive than Armstead and he didnt really help us after november. He had 8 weeks of rest and didnt really influence the super bowl. Thats sobering. We cant invest 17m for 230 snaps. Just cant do it. There has to be a game plan to keep him high functioning next year. Or he needs to restructure big time. And theres our cap room to sign armstead.
Ford isn't getting cut this year. His cap hit is 15.9 million and the Niners would have to eat 6.8 million in dead cap if they do. Cutting Ford is more practical next season with a 17.6 million cap hit and the 49ers eat only 4.8 million but gain 12.8 million in cap space.
[ Edited by SisterFister on Feb 20, 2020 at 9:58 PM ]
Feb 20, 2020 at 10:47 PM
- Hawaii49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,722
Originally posted by SisterFister:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Is armstead the odd man out or Ford? Hes more expensive than Armstead and he didnt really help us after november. He had 8 weeks of rest and didnt really influence the super bowl. Thats sobering. We cant invest 17m for 230 snaps. Just cant do it. There has to be a game plan to keep him high functioning next year. Or he needs to restructure big time. And theres our cap room to sign armstead.
Ford isn't getting cut this year. His cap hit is 15.9 million and the Niners would have to eat 6.8 million in dead cap if they do. Cutting Ford is more practical next season with a 17.6 million cap hit and the 49ers eat only 4.8 million but gain 12.8 million in cap space.
After listening to LockedOn49ers with Overthecap It seems like signing or giving AA the option is highly unlikely. Lets hope Paraag can pull a rabbit out of his hat.
https://www.lockedon49ers.com/sf-49ers/podcast-free-agency-and-salary-cap-with-brad-spielberger-of-otc/
Feb 21, 2020 at 1:33 AM
- mayo49
- Veteran
- Posts: 64,653
Originally posted by SisterFister:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Is armstead the odd man out or Ford? Hes more expensive than Armstead and he didnt really help us after november. He had 8 weeks of rest and didnt really influence the super bowl. Thats sobering. We cant invest 17m for 230 snaps. Just cant do it. There has to be a game plan to keep him high functioning next year. Or he needs to restructure big time. And theres our cap room to sign armstead.
Ford isn't getting cut this year. His cap hit is 15.9 million and the Niners would have to eat 6.8 million in dead cap if they do. Cutting Ford is more practical next season with a 17.6 million cap hit and the 49ers eat only 4.8 million but gain 12.8 million in cap space.
Ford isn't going anywhere this year - they'll see how he looks and decide next year if he's back.
Feb 21, 2020 at 2:35 AM
- DRCHOWDER
- Veteran
- Posts: 16,672
Arik ARMAloseoutsidecontain
Feb 21, 2020 at 6:29 AM
- SlowDownBoy
- Veteran
- Posts: 642
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:Arik ARMAloseoutsidecontain
Let's Harp on the on mistake he made during the super bowl as if it was that one play that cost the team the game
Feb 21, 2020 at 6:33 AM
- GoreGoreGore
- 10HourChicken
- Posts: 58,354
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by SisterFister:Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:Is armstead the odd man out or Ford? Hes more expensive than Armstead and he didnt really help us after november. He had 8 weeks of rest and didnt really influence the super bowl. Thats sobering. We cant invest 17m for 230 snaps. Just cant do it. There has to be a game plan to keep him high functioning next year. Or he needs to restructure big time. And theres our cap room to sign armstead.
Ford isn't getting cut this year. His cap hit is 15.9 million and the Niners would have to eat 6.8 million in dead cap if they do. Cutting Ford is more practical next season with a 17.6 million cap hit and the 49ers eat only 4.8 million but gain 12.8 million in cap space.
Ummm...why are u fisting your sister?
Feb 21, 2020 at 6:41 AM
- LasVegasWally
- Veteran
- Posts: 24,507
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by SisterFister:
I've been thinking about AA all day. As much as I would like to keep him, I think the best option for the team is to move on. His market is going to be expensive. Some will argue there are ways to manipulate the cap. I don't doubt that. What I do know is we have 2 large extensions to players better than Armstead. Kittle and Buckner. One thing to keep in mind with AA is he will somewhat set a market for Buckner. Since Buckner is without a doubt a much better player than AA, Buckner will be licking his chops if the 49ers commit a long term deal with AA in the annual range of 16-18 million a year.
The best move for the team imo is to tag and trade Armstead. Do what the Texans did with Clowney and Chiefs did with Ford.
We know the team is short on draft picks this year. Many have suggested a trade out of the 1st to recoup extra picks. The problem with this strategy is we do not know who will be available when the 49ers draft. This class is deep at WR and OL. And there are some good QBs in this class making it all the more likely a player whom the 9ers covet will be there at 31. I think it would be foolish for them to dismiss the pick entirely in hope for a trade down.
So how can the 49ers come away with more picks and still have a formidable defensive line next year? I think the answer is to trade Armstead. The next question would be what is Armsteads worth? Given his production, his age, and his ability to play anywhere on the line. This is how I see it.
10-15% the 49ers can get a late 1st
55-65% the 49ers can get an early 2nd
70-90% the 49ers can get a late 2nd
100% the 49ers can get a 3rd and a 4th
Any of these options are better to me than letting AA walk completely and getting a 3rd round comp next year, or, tagging him this year and letting him walk in 2021 and receiving a 3rd rounder in 2022. Or signing him to a massive extension at 16-18 million annually for 5-6 years.
Assuming we can tag and trade AA, which in my opinion seems highly likely given his value and the need at the position. What are the 49ers options to replace him?1. Solomon Thomas. Trust me, I'm not excited about this anymore than you are. However there are some things to note. Pff has generally liked Thomas as a run defender whether inside or out. We know he plays better as a pass rusher on the inside. His cap hit is 8.9 million and it's been rumored the 49ers might have to attach a pick to trade him to save roughly 4 million on the cap while still being responsible for the other 4 million. That doesn't seem wise to me. The question for the coaches is pretty simple.
On running downs is a line of
Bucker/Thomas/DJ Jones/Bosa or
Thomas/Buckner/Jones/Bosa
And on passing downs
Ford/Buckner/Thomas/Bosa
A significant detriment to the defensive line as a whole unit? With these units Thomas will have much of the 1 on 1 opportunities Armstead had inside this year. While I'm certainly not convinced Thomas is nearly as good as AA, Thomas will have plenty of opportunities in both the run game and passing game to beat interior 1 on 1 matchups.
One important note in all of this is Armstead was virtually a non factor in his first 4 years in the league. Flip through this thread and you can see the majority of the posts are scrutinizing his play. It wasn't until Ford and Bosa came along that AA was able to flourish. Could Thomas be on a similar path to success? I think he has a great opportunity to do so. And his cap hit of 8.9 million will be the difference in being able to resign Ward or Sanders, possibly both, instead of paying Armstead.
2. Free agency
I started browsing through potential 4-3 DT's on Walter football and a couple players stood out to me as guys the 49ers could bring in on short term deals that could flourish with Buckner, Jones, Ford, and Bosa. Given age, injury history, and previous salaries these players aren't neccesarily getting long term deals except maybe Jefferson, he is only 26.
1. Michael Brockers
2. Quinten Jefferson
3. Ndamukong Suh
4. Timmy Jernigan
5. Shelby Harris
I'm not arguing for any one person or what type of deal they should get. Only saying the 49ers may have options in free agency to bring in a solid veteran player at a cheaper price tag than AA.
3. The draft
There could be a possible replacement for AA in the draft. With other needs on the team, specifically at WR, OL, and in the secondary, and without 2nd-3rd-4th round picks, it seems unlikely. Even if the 49ers trade out.
Tag/sign and trade AA. Get what you can in draft capital. Focus on extending our true franchise players. The cap will certainly go up but it is of the upmost importance to remain cap flexible more than ever to continue being competitive. Sacrifices must be made and Armstead is a cap casualty.
Or they just keep Armstead and keep together the best part of this 49ers team that had an incredibly successful season. The team finally had a great season and it seems odd to me that people are trying to come up with ways to take the team apart.
THIS x a million!
Feb 21, 2020 at 6:49 AM
- NCommand
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 123,365
Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by okdkid:The salary cap is going to be $30M-40M *higher* in the next two years.
Why would anybody care that we sign 2-3 huge deals this offseason? In fact, I wish we could sign more, before the new salary cap is reflected in these deals.
Armstead
Buckner
Kittle
Ward
Sanders
Warner (I wish he was eligible)
DJ Jones
Tartt
Tomlinson
All deserving of new deals, if not this offseason, then next. ALL can easily be done with the cap set to explode the way it will with the new CBA.
You damn well know paraag has this all figured out
Toss in contracts like Ford, who can easily be moved off of after this yr. just structure AA's contact to reflect SF cutting Ford in 2021...if Ford somehow gets healthy and balls out, just restructure his deal next yr.
100%. He's had this figured out half way through the season once AA started balling out, hence the immediate restructures of Richburg and Alexander. More to come. The only thing I fear is his moneyball mindset. I'd hate for him to talk ShanaLynch into getting cheaper but similar production from lesser players like Thomas, Blair, Taylor and Moore.
But this new CBA thing probably has his entire department working overtime to find the loopholes ASAP. And it may make the moneyball approach moot anyhow. Let's hope.