There are 281 users in the forums
Jacksonville Jaguar Arik Armstead-DT Thread
Mar 12, 2020 at 6:55 PM
- FL9er
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,793
If you believe LaCanfora (according to him, 99 is the 2nd best player at his position after the other 99 in LA), the 49ers may be choosing between AA & Defo (with Buck the bigger priority).
Mar 12, 2020 at 7:36 PM
- LifelongNiner
- Veteran
- Posts: 23,164
Originally posted by FL9er:
If you believe LaCanfora (according to him, 99 is the 2nd best player at his position after the other 99 in LA), the 49ers may be choosing between AA & Defo (with Buck the bigger priority).
I don't. They are working to get it done with AA and I think he is here for the short term future.
Mar 12, 2020 at 8:36 PM
- Heroism
- Veteran
- Posts: 23,913
Originally posted by FL9er:
If you believe LaCanfora
The worst in the business.
Mar 13, 2020 at 9:55 AM
- mayo49
- Veteran
- Posts: 64,639
Deadline is Sunday to tag AA.
[ Edited by mayo49 on Mar 13, 2020 at 10:44 AM ]
Mar 13, 2020 at 11:19 AM
- NCommand
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 123,365
Originally posted by Heroism:Originally posted by FL9er:If you believe LaCanfora
The worst in the business.
100%. He's horrendous.
Mar 13, 2020 at 11:23 AM
- evil
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,235
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by mayo49:Deadline is Sunday to tag AA.
That is misinformation.
The NFLPA and NFL Management Council agreed to extend the franchise/transition tag deadline to 8:59:59 a.m. PT Monday. The original deadline was scheduled for this Thursday at 1 p.m. PT.
Mar 13, 2020 at 11:25 AM
- mayo49
- Veteran
- Posts: 64,639
Originally posted by evil:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Deadline is Sunday to tag AA.
That is misinformation.
The NFLPA and NFL Management Council agreed to extend the franchise/transition tag deadline to 8:59:59 a.m. PT Monday. The original deadline was scheduled for this Thursday at 1 p.m. PT.
Sorry, your correct - I'm getting my dates mixed up.
[ Edited by mayo49 on Mar 13, 2020 at 11:26 AM ]
Mar 13, 2020 at 11:39 AM
- RTFirefly
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,262
Originally posted by evil:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Deadline is Sunday to tag AA.
That is misinformation.
The NFLPA and NFL Management Council agreed to extend the franchise/transition tag deadline to 8:59:59 a.m. PT Monday. The original deadline was scheduled for this Thursday at 1 p.m. PT.
That's also the time when FA "legal tampering" begins, which we all know means that all the FA announcements will start pouring in and by the end of Monday, FA will be over for all the decent FAs. Wed. is when the official, legal FA signings happen.
49 1/2 hours to go. Gonna be a long weekend.
Mar 13, 2020 at 11:57 AM
- mayo49
- Veteran
- Posts: 64,639
Originally posted by RTFirefly:
Originally posted by evil:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Deadline is Sunday to tag AA.
That is misinformation.
The NFLPA and NFL Management Council agreed to extend the franchise/transition tag deadline to 8:59:59 a.m. PT Monday. The original deadline was scheduled for this Thursday at 1 p.m. PT.
That's also the time when FA "legal tampering" begins, which we all know means that all the FA announcements will start pouring in and by the end of Monday, FA will be over for all the decent FAs. Wed. is when the official, legal FA signings happen.
49 1/2 hours to go. Gonna be a long weekend.
Yeah, it's going to be crazy.
[ Edited by mayo49 on Mar 13, 2020 at 11:58 AM ]
Mar 13, 2020 at 6:39 PM
- Hopper
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,053
Originally posted by FL9er:
If you believe LaCanfora (according to him, 99 is the 2nd best player at his position after the other 99 in LA), the 49ers may be choosing between AA & Defo (with Buck the bigger priority).
Which no one should ever do.
Mar 13, 2020 at 6:41 PM
- LasVegasWally
- Veteran
- Posts: 24,504
Originally posted by Heroism:
Originally posted by FL9er:
If you believe LaCanfora
The worst in the business.
2nd worst - Cohn takes the booby prize
Mar 13, 2020 at 7:04 PM
- RTFirefly
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,262
Originally posted by RTFirefly:
That's also the time when FA "legal tampering" begins, which we all know means that all the FA announcements will start pouring in and by the end of Monday, FA will be over for all the decent FAs. Wed. is when the official, legal FA signings happen.
49 1/2 hours to go. Gonna be a long weekend.
Gonna have to work on my "counting".
Mar 13, 2020 at 8:08 PM
- Bobdawg78
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,745
So if we can get a 2nd for Armstead in a tag and trade, does that probably make the most sense for us? AA had been mediocre his first 4 seasons with us, and then finally last year in a contract year, he has a CARER YEAR. Scary number that Armstead got like 80% of his sacks this season when Ford was on the field, and Ford only played like 25% of total snaps this season. I think Armstead isn't this player, production wise going forward, so we might as wel save that money for Buckner+Kittle, and get what we can in trade for him while we can.
Let Thomas basically play the same role that Armstead did this year with us, Play outside on base downs, and slide inside on passing downs. With the 2nd round pick we get for Armstead, I would definately draft a DL to help with our depth.
Let Thomas basically play the same role that Armstead did this year with us, Play outside on base downs, and slide inside on passing downs. With the 2nd round pick we get for Armstead, I would definately draft a DL to help with our depth.
Mar 13, 2020 at 8:37 PM
- pasodoc9er
- Veteran
- Posts: 21,036
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by BOI49er:Originally posted by pasodoc9er:Originally posted by tjd808185:Originally posted by pasodoc9er:Not quite sure how folks want to keep Dee and trade Arik. Dee is the one who couldn't get on the field..or stay on it. Arik played virtually most of every game. He also plays both inside and out, and plays them well. I'd like to keep Dee, but if so , we need to get yet another starter/backup at Rt DE, and hope we get some meaningful playing time out of Dee. 226 snaps is about a quarter of the total plays. And that just doesn't cut it.
True, when healthy , Dee is hell on wheels coming around the LT. I know he worked hard to get ready for SB, but he played minimally and we finished the game in 2nd half mostly with Solly and Zettle out there, not Dee. So let's get this straight. We got a healthy , virtual all pro in Arik , who plays both DE and DT. Not many of those out there. Dee is the one who is the problem with both knees and hammy. Keeping Dee and trading Arik is so goofy as to not even be considered .
If we do keep Dee, it will then require yet another player to back him up. Arik, OTOH, is locked, loaded , and ready to go.
Because when Dee is on the field we're soooooo much better. He compliments Bosa/ Buckner to perfection. Having that speed rusher to go with the interior pressure is lethal. Just look at how many of AA/ Bosa's sacks came when Dee was on the field.
Very tough one because Dee is aging and injury prone. I want AA back badly but don't discount what Ford brings to the table. Even on the field 25% of the time he was a force for us.
Yup, there is nothing more exciting than seeing Dee whiz around the LT, and chaos plus that leaves Buck, Nick and Arik to join in. No question with Dee in there, we are the #1 DL or front 7 in the league. Operative words are "with Dee in there"...and 226 snaps, or approx 1/4 of the plays, he does all that. But he tried hard to be ready for the SB and just couldn't do it. Therein lies the problem. So secure Arik giving us the golden 3 some. But if we keep Dee, he HAS TO have a backup/starter to replace him, and when we get those 226 snaps we are unbeatable. Unfortunately, that just isn't enough to get us thru a season.. talks about letting Arik go and keeping Dee? Just no way that makes any sense.
Eight of AA's ten sacs came with Dee on the field 25% of the time. The other 75% of the snaps, AA got Two Sacks. I don't want to say "what good is he?", but it ain't $19m in our situation.
According to Daniel Jeremiah, we just restructured Ariks contract to make it count only $12 mill this yr instead of 14 mil. Jeremiah also thinks we won't be able to keep Arik. I think he is dead wrong. If we got an offer on Dee, I would consider it carefully. 226 snaps just isnt enough to get us a SB win. Had he been in more than just some of first half, we win the game (IMO). But here we have to keep the guy who was on the field a lot this yr, and played lites out.
We do, however, need another Dee, but a healthy one. And it is true, each one of these guys makes the others look and play better. When Dee was in we had best DL in league. Unfortunately it just wasn't often enough.
Mar 13, 2020 at 9:10 PM
- mayo49
- Veteran
- Posts: 64,639
Originally posted by pasodoc9er:
Originally posted by BOI49er:
Originally posted by pasodoc9er:
Originally posted by tjd808185:
Originally posted by pasodoc9er:
Not quite sure how folks want to keep Dee and trade Arik. Dee is the one who couldn't get on the field..or stay on it. Arik played virtually most of every game. He also plays both inside and out, and plays them well. I'd like to keep Dee, but if so , we need to get yet another starter/backup at Rt DE, and hope we get some meaningful playing time out of Dee. 226 snaps is about a quarter of the total plays. And that just doesn't cut it.
True, when healthy , Dee is hell on wheels coming around the LT. I know he worked hard to get ready for SB, but he played minimally and we finished the game in 2nd half mostly with Solly and Zettle out there, not Dee. So let's get this straight. We got a healthy , virtual all pro in Arik , who plays both DE and DT. Not many of those out there. Dee is the one who is the problem with both knees and hammy. Keeping Dee and trading Arik is so goofy as to not even be considered .
If we do keep Dee, it will then require yet another player to back him up. Arik, OTOH, is locked, loaded , and ready to go.
Because when Dee is on the field we're soooooo much better. He compliments Bosa/ Buckner to perfection. Having that speed rusher to go with the interior pressure is lethal. Just look at how many of AA/ Bosa's sacks came when Dee was on the field.
Very tough one because Dee is aging and injury prone. I want AA back badly but don't discount what Ford brings to the table. Even on the field 25% of the time he was a force for us.
Yup, there is nothing more exciting than seeing Dee whiz around the LT, and chaos plus that leaves Buck, Nick and Arik to join in. No question with Dee in there, we are the #1 DL or front 7 in the league. Operative words are "with Dee in there"...and 226 snaps, or approx 1/4 of the plays, he does all that. But he tried hard to be ready for the SB and just couldn't do it. Therein lies the problem. So secure Arik giving us the golden 3 some. But if we keep Dee, he HAS TO have a backup/starter to replace him, and when we get those 226 snaps we are unbeatable. Unfortunately, that just isn't enough to get us thru a season.. talks about letting Arik go and keeping Dee? Just no way that makes any sense.
Eight of AA's ten sacs came with Dee on the field 25% of the time. The other 75% of the snaps, AA got Two Sacks. I don't want to say "what good is he?", but it ain't $19m in our situation.
According to Daniel Jeremiah, we just restructured Ariks contract to make it count only $12 mill this yr instead of 14 mil. Jeremiah also thinks we won't be able to keep Arik. I think he is dead wrong. If we got an offer on Dee, I would consider it carefully. 226 snaps just isnt enough to get us a SB win. Had he been in more than just some of first half, we win the game (IMO). But here we have to keep the guy who was on the field a lot this yr, and played lites out.
We do, however, need another Dee, but a healthy one. And it is true, each one of these guys makes the others look and play better. When Dee was in we had best DL in league. Unfortunately it just wasn't often enough.
paso, where did you get this info about Daniel Jeremiah and Arik restructuring his contract?