Originally posted by glorydayz:
Originally posted by GolittaCamper:
Originally posted by glorydayz:
Originally posted by GolittaCamper:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by GolittaCamper:
Keeps showing everyone who said he wasn't hall of fame material....just how right they were!
What a douche bag!
How in the world is TO anything but HOF material?
2nd all time in yards
3rd all time in TDs
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/O/OwenTe00.htm
That right there is enough to make him a no-brainer HOFer.
You're thinking of the Hall Of Numbers, Hall Of Fame is about numbers and a whole lot more, he lacks all of the whole lot more of true Hall Of Famer, and he's showing us all now!
If this is true, what is Roger Craig lacking?
Nothing! Sadly it seems now a days people are focused only on numbers. The Hall once meant more that that!
The fact that great like Catfish isn't in, and primadonna like TO is....
What exactly does "so much more" mean?
So you think a crappy player with a great attitude is a HOFer?
T.O is arguably the second or third best WR of all time!
I look for three things:
Numbers, how do you compare to your peers.
Leadership/sportsmanship, how did you profit in big games, and hard times.
We're you a big part of the era you played in, can the story of the time you played ball be told without mentioning you.
Two out three is good enough for me, TO is a one.
He put up great numbers.
He was a bad teammate, a poor sport, and played small in big games.
True you can't tell the story of the late 90's early 00's without talking about "Diva reciva's" , but there were plenty of blow hard punks playing receiver then.
So, that's my take, I don't give fart in the wind what anyone says or thinks, TO is not a HOFer, at least he wouldn't have been back in the day. Now a days everyone gets a medal, and pizza after the game.
