Marcus Peters Thread | Page 20 | 49ers Webzone Forum

Sep 26, 2016 at 10:48 AM

SundayTicket
Member
Posts: 5,316

This dudes good AF, but if you watch his highlights, he also gets burned hard AF occasionally.. Thats why for a QB its a dangerous game throwing at him

Sep 26, 2016 at 10:58 AM

#287

itlynstalyn
Veteran
Posts: 38,520

Originally posted by SundayTicket:
This dudes good AF, but if you watch his highlights, he also gets burned hard AF occasionally.. Thats why for a QB its a dangerous game throwing at him

He does take too many chances in my opinion but he's young and his gambles have paid off more often than not. He made Marshall look like a shell of his former self yesterday.

Sep 26, 2016 at 11:09 AM

#288

Cjez
Hall of Fame
Posts: 165,899

anyone who says they wouldn't take him over any of our DBs is full of s**t

Sep 26, 2016 at 11:18 AM

#289

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 120,876
NFL Pick 'em

Originally posted by itlynstalyn:

Originally posted by AmpLee:
You know, I get the Peters love, I really do, but I also think that our past with guys like Aldon Smith and Ray McDonald really turned this FO off from picking a guy with such a checkered past in the first round. Armstead may turn our to be a turd, he also may turn out to be pretty darned good, but picking Peters was a risk that this organization couldn't take in the aftermath of Aldon Smith and Ray McDonald. I think if people can come to terms with the context of unpredictable behavior in this organization, they will understand why a talent like Peters was passed on.

So then why did he draft Rashard Robinson? Is getting kicked off your team worse than burglary now?

this

Sep 26, 2016 at 11:25 AM

#290

Young2Rice
Veteran
Posts: 70,677

Originally posted by ChazBoner:
anyone who says they wouldn't take him over any of our DBs is full of s**t

Yup we have a bunch of solid to scrub DBs. Nobody special.

We let the hobbled hobbit and Baldwin light us up.

Sep 26, 2016 at 11:28 AM

#291

Young2Rice
Veteran
Posts: 70,677

Originally posted by itlynstalyn:

Originally posted by AmpLee:
You know, I get the Peters love, I really do, but I also think that our past with guys like Aldon Smith and Ray McDonald really turned this FO off from picking a guy with such a checkered past in the first round. Armstead may turn our to be a turd, he also may turn out to be pretty darned good, but picking Peters was a risk that this organization couldn't take in the aftermath of Aldon Smith and Ray McDonald. I think if people can come to terms with the context of unpredictable behavior in this organization, they will understand why a talent like Peters was passed on.

So then why did he draft Rashard Robinson? Is getting kicked off your team worse than burglary now?

Also in that same year we drafted Aaron Lynch, who had more red flags then a Chinese courthouse.

[ Edited by Young2Rice on Sep 26, 2016 at 11:28 AM ]

Sep 26, 2016 at 11:30 AM

#292

SundayTicket
Member
Posts: 5,316

Originally posted by ChazBoner:
anyone who says they wouldn't take him over any of our DBs is full of s**t

Someone actually said this?

Sep 26, 2016 at 2:37 PM

#293

Cjez
Hall of Fame
Posts: 165,899

Originally posted by SundayTicket:

Originally posted by ChazBoner:
anyone who says they wouldn't take him over any of our DBs is full of s**t

Someone actually said this?

probably. most in NT have convinced themselves that Peters is terrible, just to cope with the fact that we picked a bust over him.

Sep 26, 2016 at 3:07 PM

#294

SunDevilNiner79
Hall of Fame
Posts: 57,267

Originally posted by SundayTicket:

Originally posted by ChazBoner:
anyone who says they wouldn't take him over any of our DBs is full of s**t

Someone actually said this?

Go back a few pages, all the Baalke lovers were trashing Peters after one game.

Sep 26, 2016 at 3:13 PM

#295

SunDevilNiner79
Hall of Fame
Posts: 57,267

Originally posted by NCommand:
Besides, Acker is a 6th rounder and is way more disciplined and has 3 INT's and 2 (easy) dropped INT's as well and missed some time. And this behind 0 pass rush and an odd scheme to boot.

hmmm someone thinks Acker is better than Peters.

Probably why we traded him to the Chiefs so Acker can play behind Peters to teach him how to play

Sep 26, 2016 at 4:54 PM

#296

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 120,876
NFL Pick 'em

Originally posted by AmpLee:
Originally posted by itlynstalyn:
Originally posted by AmpLee:
You know, I get the Peters love, I really do, but I also think that our past with guys like Aldon Smith and Ray McDonald really turned this FO off from picking a guy with such a checkered past in the first round. Armstead may turn our to be a turd, he also may turn out to be pretty darned good, but picking Peters was a risk that this organization couldn't take in the aftermath of Aldon Smith and Ray McDonald. I think if people can come to terms with the context of unpredictable behavior in this organization, they will understand why a talent like Peters was passed on.

So then why did he draft Rashard Robinson? Is getting kicked off your team worse than burglary now?

Strawman. If you re-read my argument, you'll see that it has to do with picking guys with checkered pasts in the first round, not the fourth or fifth round.

Lol moving the goal posts. Why should it matter where you take them. If they get in trouble it's all the same.

Sep 26, 2016 at 5:03 PM

#297

TheRambler
Veteran
Posts: 38,341

Originally posted by AmpLee:
Strawman. If you re-read my argument, you'll see that it has to do with picking guys with checkered pasts in the first round, not the fourth or fifth round.

That argument never ever gets addressed. Because they aren't actually making arguments. They are just complaining.

Sep 26, 2016 at 5:07 PM

#298

SunDevilNiner79
Hall of Fame
Posts: 57,267

Originally posted by TheRambler:

Originally posted by AmpLee:
Strawman. If you re-read my argument, you'll see that it has to do with picking guys with checkered pasts in the first round, not the fourth or fifth round.

That argument never ever gets addressed. Because they aren't actually making arguments. They are just complaining.

How does Peters have a checkered past? He butted heads with a new coaching staff and took his talents to the NFL. Peters has never been in trouble with the law.

Sep 26, 2016 at 5:12 PM

#299

itlynstalyn
Veteran
Posts: 38,520

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by NCommand:
Besides, Acker is a 6th rounder and is way more disciplined and has 3 INT's and 2 (easy) dropped INT's as well and missed some time. And this behind 0 pass rush and an odd scheme to boot.

hmmm someone thinks Acker is better than Peters.

Probably why we traded him to the Chiefs so Acker can play behind Peters to teach him how to play

Clearly you're taking that comment out of context

Sep 26, 2016 at 5:55 PM

#300

SunDevilNiner79
Hall of Fame
Posts: 57,267

Originally posted by AmpLee:
I have no problem with the team taking chances on players that have attitude problems or police records with later round picks. With first round picks, when you're building a young team that has lost so many veterans, you want talented high character guys with your early picks. I'm pretty consistent with this argument, so unless you want to argue the point I am making, it's you moving the goal posts. With how often your posts misrepresent arguments, I'm not sure you understand what it means to move the goal posts.

You're assuming that Peters is a "low" character player and that the player we picked is a "high" character player.

I personally would prefer an arrogant confident player that thinks he is the best in the world over a play that I assume is soft (Armstead). Give me a fighter who competes over someone who dissapears.

To me, having a lot of fight and competitiveness = high character on your team.