Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:
Originally posted by AmpLee:
I have no problem with the team taking chances on players that have attitude problems or police records with later round picks. With first round picks, when you're building a young team that has lost so many veterans, you want talented high character guys with your early picks. I'm pretty consistent with this argument, so unless you want to argue the point I am making, it's you moving the goal posts. With how often your posts misrepresent arguments, I'm not sure you understand what it means to move the goal posts.
You're assuming that Peters is a "low" character player and that the player we picked is a "high" character player.
I personally would prefer an arrogant confident player that thinks he is the best in the world over a play that I assume is soft (Armstead). Give me a fighter who competes over someone who dissapears.
To me, having a lot of fight and competitiveness = high character on your team.
Originally posted by AmpLee:
I consider getting kicked off a team a big red flag. We can argue the semantics of "checkered-past", but for the sake of clarity, I was referring to his documented attitude problems with previous coaches, not a police record.
I haven't met the guy, but from reading his interviews and what here is about him on the internet, I didn't think he was a risk. You need cornerbacks that are mean angry cocky son-of-a-b***hes out there, just look at Norman. If they aren't arrogant (which IMO is where Peters problems with U-Dub stemmed from), your gonna be crushed in the NFL.
edit:
Sherman butted heads with Harbaugh at Stanford, does that make Sherman a low character player?
[ Edited by SunDevilNiner79 on Sep 26, 2016 at 5:58 PM ]