Originally posted by communist:
Originally posted by jcs:on the first glance, they would have lost against the cap.
Originally posted by communist:
from salary cap standpoint i don't get the gurley move at all. anyone who could explain it to me?
Maybe he's not as healthy as they were letting last season?
however, his release will be a post June the first, hence they indeed save cap space.
I don't claim to understand all this, but here is an excerpt from a profootballrumors.com article but it captures the essence of the situation quite well.
"This move comes less than 15 minutes before Gurley would have been guaranteed $10.5MM. It will send the 25-year-old running back into free agency. The Rams will eat a staggering $20.15MM in dead money in total, though they'll spread it out over two years via the post-June 1 designation (via Field Yates of ESPN.com). The Rams will also see $5.5MM in cap savings, starting on June 2."
This is the Ripping-the-Bandaid off approach, but they didn't have much choice. He was going to cost them over $17 million to keep and they don't seem to think he is worth the difference, or they need the money to sign other players.