There are 265 users in the forums
Originally posted by WINiner:Originally posted by philosoraptor:Originally posted by susweel:Did buckner even play vs the bucs
Yeah. Outside that TFL he didn't have a particularly good game, but that's alright. We got 15 more
Go rewatch the game Defo was dominant.
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Who are the better defensive tackles in the NFL, which of those DTs are elite defensive tackles?
Who is better on the 49ers?
Trolling or for real?
Outside of Donald or Fletcher Cox you can argue Buckner is easily the next guy in line at DT.
No, otherwise he would have.
Here's how this goes down. You ask a question to which you've already settled on the answer. I name anybody I want. You say something about how uninformed I am and that's that. Name literally all the pro bowl DL that didn't need to get help to get in the pro bowl. There's your list.
You don't know who they are, lol.
Originally posted by okdkid:Originally posted by TheWooLick:Originally posted by okdkid:Originally posted by TheWooLick:Originally posted by genus49:Originally posted by okdkid:Originally posted by TheWooLick:Who are the better defensive tackles in the NFL, which of those DTs are elite defensive tackles?
Who is better on the 49ers?
Trolling or for real?
Outside of Donald or Fletcher Cox you can argue Buckner is easily the next guy in line at DT.
No, otherwise he would have.
Here's how this goes down. You ask a question to which you've already settled on the answer. I name anybody I want. You say something about how uninformed I am and that's that. Name literally all the pro bowl DL that didn't need to get help to get in the pro bowl. There's your list.
You don't know who they are, lol.
hahahaha love the 'zone
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Who are the better defensive tackles in the NFL, which of those DTs are elite defensive tackles?
Who is better on the 49ers?
Trolling or for real?
Outside of Donald or Fletcher Cox you can argue Buckner is easily the next guy in line at DT.
No, otherwise he would have.
Here's how this goes down. You ask a question to which you've already settled on the answer. I name anybody I want. You say something about how uninformed I am and that's that. Name literally all the pro bowl DL that didn't need to get help to get in the pro bowl. There's your list.
You don't know who they are, lol.
hahahaha love the 'zone
Well, after your convincing arguments, now I am convinced he is neither a top 2 interior d lineman nor the best player on the 49ers.
Originally posted by Memphis9er:Originally posted by Byisgod:I'll admit, DeFo didn't have a splashy game. And I do think he's overrated by a lot of people on here. But here's the thing: He doesn't need to be BY or Stubby—not with the new D-line we have. Even if he just plays solid, he will get opportunities to flash because there is simply too much talent on the front for everyone to be blocked consistently. If Ford or Bosa have a slow game, it's entirely possible that someone like DeFo or Arik will have a huge one.
He had a better season last year than Bryant Young ever did, lol.
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Thats debatable. Young had a couple years that i think were better. I would still say so far that i would take 1. Justin Smith 2. BY 3. Buckner. Buckner does have a shot to be better than BY though. Not there yet.
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Thats debatable. Young had a couple years that i think were better. I would still say so far that i would take 1. Justin Smith 2. BY 3. Buckner. Buckner does have a shot to be better than BY though. Not there yet.
Agree. I think Buckner's issue is consistency. Justin Smith brought it every game. Peak BY did as well. He certainly has all the tools to get there. And now he has the horses next to him. Just has to do it.
Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Thats debatable. Young had a couple years that i think were better. I would still say so far that i would take 1. Justin Smith 2. BY 3. Buckner. Buckner does have a shot to be better than BY though. Not there yet.
Agree. I think Buckner's issue is consistency. Justin Smith brought it every game. Peak BY did as well. He certainly has all the tools to get there. And now he has the horses next to him. Just has to do it.
This was the issue last year.. sure he had 12 sacks, but if you watched all the games, he's no where to be found on some quarters...... and this is why he's yet a SUPERSTAR !!!
Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Thats debatable. Young had a couple years that i think were better. I would still say so far that i would take 1. Justin Smith 2. BY 3. Buckner. Buckner does have a shot to be better than BY though. Not there yet.
Agree. I think Buckner's issue is consistency. Justin Smith brought it every game. Peak BY did as well. He certainly has all the tools to get there. And now he has the horses next to him. Just has to do it.
This was the issue last year.. sure he had 12 sacks, but if you watched all the games, he's no where to be found on some quarters...... and this is why he's yet a SUPERSTAR !!!
Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Thats debatable. Young had a couple years that i think were better. I would still say so far that i would take 1. Justin Smith 2. BY 3. Buckner. Buckner does have a shot to be better than BY though. Not there yet.
Agree. I think Buckner's issue is consistency. Justin Smith brought it every game. Peak BY did as well. He certainly has all the tools to get there. And now he has the horses next to him. Just has to do it.
This was the issue last year.. sure he had 12 sacks, but if you watched all the games, he's no where to be found on some quarters...... and this is why he's yet a SUPERSTAR !!!
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Thats debatable. Young had a couple years that i think were better. I would still say so far that i would take 1. Justin Smith 2. BY 3. Buckner. Buckner does have a shot to be better than BY though. Not there yet.
Agree. I think Buckner's issue is consistency. Justin Smith brought it every game. Peak BY did as well. He certainly has all the tools to get there. And now he has the horses next to him. Just has to do it.
This was the issue last year.. sure he had 12 sacks, but if you watched all the games, he's no where to be found on some quarters...... and this is why he's yet a SUPERSTAR !!!
Originally posted by Joecool:Originally posted by Waterbear:Originally posted by 9moon:Originally posted by okdkid:Originally posted by Waterbear:Thats debatable. Young had a couple years that i think were better. I would still say so far that i would take 1. Justin Smith 2. BY 3. Buckner. Buckner does have a shot to be better than BY though. Not there yet.
Agree. I think Buckner's issue is consistency. Justin Smith brought it every game. Peak BY did as well. He certainly has all the tools to get there. And now he has the horses next to him. Just has to do it.
This was the issue last year.. sure he had 12 sacks, but if you watched all the games, he's no where to be found on some quarters...... and this is why he's yet a SUPERSTAR !!!
He's not wrong. DeFo is not a superstar yet.
Originally posted by 9moon:THANK YOU THANK YOU....
sad to say, that we have a bunch of FANS here who really believe that Bucko is a SUPERSTAR after being drafted.
