DeForest Buckner Traded to the Colts

Originally posted by susweel:

Originally posted by Joecool:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by okdkid:

Originally posted by Waterbear:
Thats debatable. Young had a couple years that i think were better. I would still say so far that i would take 1. Justin Smith 2. BY 3. Buckner. Buckner does have a shot to be better than BY though. Not there yet.

Agree. I think Buckner's issue is consistency. Justin Smith brought it every game. Peak BY did as well. He certainly has all the tools to get there. And now he has the horses next to him. Just has to do it.

This was the issue last year.. sure he had 12 sacks, but if you watched all the games, he's no where to be found on some quarters...... and this is why he's yet a SUPERSTAR !!!

He's not wrong. DeFo is not a superstar yet.

Good player he needs to stack 3 solid seasons before we call him star player.

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by susweel:

Originally posted by Joecool:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by okdkid:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Thats debatable. Young had a couple years that i think were better. I would still say so far that i would take 1. Justin Smith 2. BY 3. Buckner. Buckner does have a shot to be better than BY though. Not there yet.

Agree. I think Buckner's issue is consistency. Justin Smith brought it every game. Peak BY did as well. He certainly has all the tools to get there. And now he has the horses next to him. Just has to do it.

This was the issue last year.. sure he had 12 sacks, but if you watched all the games, he's no where to be found on some quarters...... and this is why he's yet a SUPERSTAR !!!

He's not wrong. DeFo is not a superstar yet.

Good player he needs to stack 3 solid seasons before we call him star player.

Sure, if he wants to be a solidstar.

Originally posted by Joecool:
If that's the definition of zero sacks or 2 sacks. Not trying to say he isn't solid or sacks are easy, but he went 7 games with zero sacks last year.

Originally posted by Joecool:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by susweel:

Originally posted by Joecool:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by okdkid:

Originally posted by Waterbear:
Thats debatable. Young had a couple years that i think were better. I would still say so far that i would take 1. Justin Smith 2. BY 3. Buckner. Buckner does have a shot to be better than BY though. Not there yet.

Agree. I think Buckner's issue is consistency. Justin Smith brought it every game. Peak BY did as well. He certainly has all the tools to get there. And now he has the horses next to him. Just has to do it.

This was the issue last year.. sure he had 12 sacks, but if you watched all the games, he's no where to be found on some quarters...... and this is why he's yet a SUPERSTAR !!!

He's not wrong. DeFo is not a superstar yet.

Good player he needs to stack 3 solid seasons before we call him star player.

Sure, if he wants to be a solidstar.

If that's the definition of zero sacks or 2 sacks. Not trying to say he isn't solid or sacks are easy, but he went 7 games with zero sacks last year.

Originally posted by okdkid:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Thats debatable. Young had a couple years that i think were better. I would still say so far that i would take 1. Justin Smith 2. BY 3. Buckner. Buckner does have a shot to be better than BY though. Not there yet.

Agree. I think Buckner's issue is consistency. Justin Smith brought it every game. Peak BY did as well. He certainly has all the tools to get there. And now he has the horses next to him. Just has to do it.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by okdkid:

Originally posted by Waterbear:
Thats debatable. Young had a couple years that i think were better. I would still say so far that i would take 1. Justin Smith 2. BY 3. Buckner. Buckner does have a shot to be better than BY though. Not there yet.

Agree. I think Buckner's issue is consistency. Justin Smith brought it every game. Peak BY did as well. He certainly has all the tools to get there. And now he has the horses next to him. Just has to do it.

Smith and BY each had some 1 and 0 tackle games in their careers.
Both were elite, like Buckner.

Originally posted by okdkid:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by okdkid:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Thats debatable. Young had a couple years that i think were better. I would still say so far that i would take 1. Justin Smith 2. BY 3. Buckner. Buckner does have a shot to be better than BY though. Not there yet.

Agree. I think Buckner's issue is consistency. Justin Smith brought it every game. Peak BY did as well. He certainly has all the tools to get there. And now he has the horses next to him. Just has to do it.

Smith and BY each had some 1 and 0 tackle games in their careers.
Both were elite, like Buckner.

And above criticism!

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Joecool:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by susweel:

Originally posted by Joecool:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by okdkid:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Thats debatable. Young had a couple years that i think were better. I would still say so far that i would take 1. Justin Smith 2. BY 3. Buckner. Buckner does have a shot to be better than BY though. Not there yet.

Agree. I think Buckner's issue is consistency. Justin Smith brought it every game. Peak BY did as well. He certainly has all the tools to get there. And now he has the horses next to him. Just has to do it.

This was the issue last year.. sure he had 12 sacks, but if you watched all the games, he's no where to be found on some quarters...... and this is why he's yet a SUPERSTAR !!!

He's not wrong. DeFo is not a superstar yet.

Good player he needs to stack 3 solid seasons before we call him star player.

Sure, if he wants to be a solidstar.

If that's the definition of zero sacks or 2 sacks. Not trying to say he isn't solid or sacks are easy, but he went 7 games with zero sacks last year.

And ADonald went 6 games with zero sacks last year. I don't know where this is going.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by okdkid:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Thats debatable. Young had a couple years that i think were better. I would still say so far that i would take 1. Justin Smith 2. BY 3. Buckner. Buckner does have a shot to be better than BY though. Not there yet.

Agree. I think Buckner's issue is consistency. Justin Smith brought it every game. Peak BY did as well. He certainly has all the tools to get there. And now he has the horses next to him. Just has to do it.

Smith and BY each had some 1 and 0 tackle games in their careers.
Both were elite, like Buckner.

Originally posted by 49ers808:
This!!!! Forget it Woo, Buck didn't get a sack and 3 tackles so he was inconsistent and sucks because of that

Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Arguing over Buckner being a superstar or not is silly.

We should all be over analyzing about 24 other players in this roster lol he's the least of our worries.

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:

Originally posted by Cisco0623:

Arguing over Buckner being a superstar or not is silly.

We should all be over analyzing about 24 other players in this roster lol he's the least of our worries.

I think we have. At some time or another most of the major players and every unit has been praised or ripped. Sometimes the praise is way too premature and the ripping gets a little silly but I guess that's what we do as fans. I prefer praise over ripping but they need to do something to earn the praise first.

Originally posted by okdkid:

Originally posted by 49ers808:

This!!!! Forget it Woo, Buck didn't get a sack and 3 tackles so he was inconsistent and sucks because of that

Who said he sucks? Did anybody? Or you just making things up?