Kirk Cousins

Originally posted by ady2glude707:
Kirk Cousins or Jimmy G?

I gotta believe that Cousins would've led a successful season if he had the Niners defense and running game to prop him up.

Cousins would've hit sanders on stride.

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

Cousins would've hit sanders on stride.

Yeah. He's so good at showing up in the big moments...

Bi Polar webzone strikes again.

Originally posted by TonyStarks:
Bi Polar webzone strikes again.

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Cousins would've hit sanders on stride.

Yeah. He's so good at showing up in the big moments...

cause jimmy did

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

Cousins would've hit sanders on stride.

Yeah. He's so good at showing up in the big moments...

cause jimmy did

And that is why Cousins would have? Your logic is severely flawed.

Originally posted by English:

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Cousins would've hit sanders on stride.

Yeah. He's so good at showing up in the big moments...

cause jimmy did

And that is why Cousins would have? Your logic is severely flawed.

no my logic is that cousins has a better deep ball than jimmy g, so chances of him hitting sanders on stride would be higher. Fact is that Jimmy missed, cousins hasn't had the chance.

At this point there is not a great divide between Jimmy G and Cousins. Give them each a few more years and it will be easier to judge between the two.

Originally posted by RishikeshA:
At this point there is not a great divide between Jimmy G and Cousins. Give them each a few more years and it will be easier to judge between the two.

The divide is definitely on the intangibles........and w/l record against good teams, prime time, etc.

Right now Jimmy has played in a Super Bowl while Cousins still has not sniffed one.

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

Originally posted by English:

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

Cousins would've hit sanders on stride.

Yeah. He's so good at showing up in the big moments...

cause jimmy did

And that is why Cousins would have? Your logic is severely flawed.

no my logic is that cousins has a better deep ball than jimmy g, so chances of him hitting sanders on stride would be higher. Fact is that Jimmy missed, cousins hasn't had the chance.

My logic is that Kirk loses to the Saints when we fall behind. He also loses to Green Bay and Seattle in the finale because they were in prime time. That makes a 5 seed 11-5 team that could beat a hobbled Philly team but loses to Green Bay in Green Bay in the divisional round. But go on and make up the Jimmy narrative however you will.

Also Cousins took over a team that went to the NFCCG the year prior, but he hasn't had a chance? Who's fault is that? And what kind of team did Jimmy take over?

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

Originally posted by English:

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Cousins would've hit sanders on stride.

Yeah. He's so good at showing up in the big moments...

cause jimmy did

And that is why Cousins would have? Your logic is severely flawed.

no my logic is that cousins has a better deep ball than jimmy g, so chances of him hitting sanders on stride would be higher. Fact is that Jimmy missed, cousins hasn't had the chance.

My logic is that Kirk loses to the Saints when we fall behind. He also loses to Green Bay and Seattle in the finale because they were in prime time. That makes a 5 seed 11-5 team that could beat a hobbled Philly team but loses to Green Bay in Green Bay in the divisional round. But go on and make up the Jimmy narrative however you will.

Also Cousins took over a team that went to the NFCCG the year prior, but he hasn't had a chance? Who's fault is that? And what kind of team did Jimmy take over?

lol what narrative you're trying to turn this into a Jimmy vs Cousins debate when all I've stated is that Cousins has a better deep ball than Jimmy. Didn't mention anything about team achievements, but sure I'm the one making up narratives when the only other thing I've stated is fact and thats that Jimmy had his chance and missed while cousins hasn't had a chance to throw to a open receiver for a game winning td in the biggest stage of their career paths, that would've cemented him into legend status. Then you go and say your logic is that kirk loses to the saints when we fall behind in the regular season, well kirk isnt a great qb at times, but he did throw the game winning td against them in the dome in the playoffs Don't understand why you guys are trying to make it as I'm saying kirk is the better qb lol....

Debate over...Cousins signed a 2 year extension

Originally posted by 9ers4u:
Debate over...Cousins signed a 2 year extension

$26-$27 Million for three years of Jimmy Guap > Cousins $96 million for three years.

Originally posted by TonyStarks:

Originally posted by 9ers4u:
Debate over...Cousins signed a 2 year extension

$26-$27 Million for three years of Jimmy Guap > Cousins $96 million for three years.

Yeah, I don't get it at all. Last year they were wanting some of that money back now they give him more lol.