Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by Chez:
why is this scrub still on the team? Sanders should've been a priority.
Sanders didn't want to re-sign with us.
damn, not a good sign. probably feels jimmy is a bust.
There are 230 users in the forums
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by Chez:
why is this scrub still on the team? Sanders should've been a priority.
Sanders didn't want to re-sign with us.
Originally posted by mayo49:Originally posted by Chez:why is this scrub still on the team? Sanders should've been a priority.
Sanders didn't want to re-sign with us.
Originally posted by Chez:Originally posted by mayo49:Originally posted by Chez:why is this scrub still on the team? Sanders should've been a priority.
Sanders didn't want to re-sign with us.
damn, not a good sign. probably feels jimmy is a bust.
Originally posted by Goatie:
I am wondering if they will give Goodwin a chance to properly compete in training and preseason for a roster spot or they are just hanging onto him to trade him?
Originally posted by WestCoastForever:what good does that speed do if he can not see the field. you can draft a million guys to do what this guy does. and with a better work ethic and commitment to the game. the goodwin excuses are stunning to me
Originally posted by Chez:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by Chez:
why is this scrub still on the team? Sanders should've been a priority.
Sanders didn't want to re-sign with us.
damn, not a good sign. probably feels jimmy is a bust.
Not if we believe what he said after he left, "Jimmy is my guy."
Also, that "scrub" has world class speed, a premium on this team.
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:like maybe 5 seconds after they choose ruggs
They might be waiting to see how the draft shakes out. If they ended up with Ruggs they would have very little reason to keep Goodwin. Maybe they make the trade after the 1st round.
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:like maybe 5 seconds after they choose ruggs
They might be waiting to see how the draft shakes out. If they ended up with Ruggs they would have very little reason to keep Goodwin. Maybe they make the trade after the 1st round.
Originally posted by stefano89:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:like maybe 5 seconds after they choose ruggs
They might be waiting to see how the draft shakes out. If they ended up with Ruggs they would have very little reason to keep Goodwin. Maybe they make the trade after the 1st round.
we have very little reason right now without ruggs to keep goodwin.
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by stefano89:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:like maybe 5 seconds after they choose ruggs
They might be waiting to see how the draft shakes out. If they ended up with Ruggs they would have very little reason to keep Goodwin. Maybe they make the trade after the 1st round.
we have very little reason right now without ruggs to keep goodwin.
there is a theory we can save lots of money if we cut him after june first to
Originally posted by stefano89:Originally posted by cciowa:Originally posted by stefano89:Originally posted by cciowa:like maybe 5 seconds after they choose ruggsOriginally posted by CatchMaster80:They might be waiting to see how the draft shakes out. If they ended up with Ruggs they would have very little reason to keep Goodwin. Maybe they make the trade after the 1st round.
we have very little reason right now without ruggs to keep goodwin.
there is a theory we can save lots of money if we cut him after june first to
Good. do that then.
Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
Originally posted by stefano89:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by stefano89:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:like maybe 5 seconds after they choose ruggs
They might be waiting to see how the draft shakes out. If they ended up with Ruggs they would have very little reason to keep Goodwin. Maybe they make the trade after the 1st round.
we have very little reason right now without ruggs to keep goodwin.
there is a theory we can save lots of money if we cut him after june first to
Good. do that then.
Not a theory. We do know this...someone has to go. No reason for this team to carry 7 receivers, which is where we are at once we draft one this year. I'd honestly like 2 rookies along with the best out of Taylor, Pettis, and Goodwin (I'm counting Samuel, Bourne, and a healthy Hurd as locks).
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
Originally posted by stefano89:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by stefano89:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:like maybe 5 seconds after they choose ruggs
They might be waiting to see how the draft shakes out. If they ended up with Ruggs they would have very little reason to keep Goodwin. Maybe they make the trade after the 1st round.
we have very little reason right now without ruggs to keep goodwin.
there is a theory we can save lots of money if we cut him after june first to
Good. do that then.
Not a theory. We do know this...someone has to go. No reason for this team to carry 7 receivers, which is where we are at once we draft one this year. I'd honestly like 2 rookies along with the best out of Taylor, Pettis, and Goodwin (I'm counting Samuel, Bourne, and a healthy Hurd as locks).
Pretty much this. I think Goodwin is an amazing human being, but this is football and he hasn't done s**t.
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
I love MG as a human, but as a player he's been average at best, had a great 2017, but dropped off in 2018 and 2019.
I can see 7 WRs to be honest, and just 2 TEs, with Hurd being a WR/TE hybrid redzone threat.