There are 429 users in the forums
Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:
seriously...? Madison retired the year after, he was old in 2007...and Rolle was a good player but he wasn't a great FS either.
Originally posted by Puckdaddy:
The question still stands. Where are the strong DBs on the roster that would warrant a strong focus on DL and no attention to the secondary?
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
I am well aware that I am speaking as a fan and not someone who is analyzing the pick.
I wanted offense.
Originally posted by tjd808185:
Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:
seriously...? Madison retired the year after, he was old in 2007...and Rolle was a good player but he wasn't a great FS either.
2x all pro isn't that good? What are your standards? By that logic is Justin Tuck that good? 2x all pro too.
Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:its cool that you are new to football and don't understand the significance a strong dline can have on a secondary, but please stop posting like it's factual what you are saying.
Originally posted by Senzino:
This guy seems a little clean cut and polite to be the beast we need on the line.
Anyone else kind of feel the same way?
Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:
looked it up, and he's a 2nd team all pro, still good enough for me, i had that wrong. but you really think those giant teams would've lost without him? come on, everybody knows it was that dline that got those Giant teams the SB.. even the talking heads agree on that lol. Brady was on his ass half the game, and that had nothing to do with Rolle. he was more of a commodity during that SB run. they could've had Mike Rumph at FS and still won.
Originally posted by Puckdaddy:
Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:
its cool that you are new to football and don't understand the significance a strong dline can have on a secondary, but please stop posting like it's factual what you are saying.
Right because you saw me state that DL was insignificant. Then you deemed me new to football based on something I NEVER said. Smh I understand the significance of EVERY position. That's what separates me from you. I won't draft a DL every year until the DL pans out. Unless the DL is ready to take accountability for all of the teams woes. Instead I'm goin to put pieces around them in which they can prosper in order to separate the problem from the power.
Originally posted by KiwiM:No attention to the secondary? There's been 1 pick!
Pass rush helps coverage. More so than the other way around.
Thomas helps pass rush and stopping the run.
Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:i'm just going by what you are saying. excuse me for not being able to also read your mind.
Originally posted by Force_Choke:3 PAC 12 players.. On the DL... If you would leave the PAC 12 alone you wouldn't have to draft the same position over and over and over again. If it wasn't for the extra picks we fleeced out of CHI I would puke. Should have taken Fournette, not because RB is a need but because that kid is going to be the best player out of this class.
Originally posted by Niners816:Originally posted by TheWooLick:Unless you can get a fqb.
Was there a Franchise QB in this draft? QB trumps all...imo there is not a franchise QB in this draft. I'm sure though we will take one before it's over though. Just not in the first when a top graded player a premium position of need which DL was.
Originally posted by Puckdaddy:
Ok and how long do we give the DL to develop before the team focuses on other parts of the defense? Or do we risk it another year until we are correct like an egotistical rich kid?