Originally posted by cciowa:players like thomas and ward and aa. to some of us.. are underachieving players borderline bad players in our opinions and i have seen few actually rooting for them to fail. hoping someone steps up and takes their job is not rooting for them to fail. it just means we have had it with them. now some posters make a good point which opens up a whole other can of worms to the people to just adore lynch..... you can blame lynch for keeping and resigning and drafting those guys. in the case of ward. sure its fine to be pissed at him cuz he is a crap player who always gets hurt. but you need to be mad at lynch for keeping him. twice. you slobber all over lynch for getting jimmy. ford etc. then he also has to be put under the microscope for decisions like this. i am done with ward. done with aa. i am willing to give thomas another off season. but if someone beats him out and he ends up leaving. i am fine with it.. its like our wide outs..... if we start the year with three new guys starting over "our guys" great
Yeah, I mean I don't think there's any posters that are saying lynch can do no wrong...I actually haven't seen much of that. We can point out good and bad moves much like most GMs.
Gotta hold them accountable good/bad, that's part of the gig.
I wouldn't lump Thomas in with guys like AA/Ward...those other two are kinda who they are at this point. I think what some people are complaining about with ST, is they don't really care about his personal issues, which imo is very dumb. That's s**t can and does effect how a person performs.
We can also look at the coaching staff and scratch our heads as to why ST was used as an edge rusher (predominantly) his 1st 2 yrs....dude is a 3-tech gap destroyer...I'm actually excited to see him used as such, sounds like we will be seeing even more attacking from our DEs this yr.
IMHO I don't think the book is written on Thomas just yet. Might not be an all-pro but in the right role he could be a quality starter for a long time.
We will see!