Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
I know we are going in circles on this, but one of the reasons that was said by many on here as to why he was a good pick was his versatility to play outside and inside. He was compared many times to Michael Bennett, and I was saying repeatedly that was a bad comp.
The box will become smaller and smaller until he's off the team IMO. But don't listen to the guy who watched him all throughout his college career at Stanford.
He has no excuses this year. If he doesn't produce, I say we explore trading him immediately.
This is true...I was most likely one of those dudes that thought he would slide into that Bennett role.
I will ask you being a Stanford watcher, how often did you see him rushing off the edge there? I think you can agree that pass rushing inside isn't the same as off the edge.
I also agree, he's got a show some massive improvement this yr or we gotta chalk it up as a poor pick.
I think it was an easy assumption to make with Sully's combine results and work ethic that he would be able to develop similar to Bennett who didn't test nearly as well.
It was a wrong assumption and for whatever reason Sully never developed outside as a pass rusher but when it became obvious we didn't change course and kept pushing him out there...hell we did the opposite. The idea was he would go inside on passing downs which make up the bulk of defensive snaps these days and he was getting like 25 to 1 outside to inside snaps in bulk of the games.
It's like we were trying to make it harder for him. That's not even taking into consideration the stuff he was dealing with with his sister.