Andrew Luck

Originally posted by jcs:

The Colts hired a Serbian landscaper?

Back in 2013, when we were still elite under Harbaugh, Luck and the Colts came into San Francisco and tore apart the 49ers 27-7. He was such a presence, I figured this guy would be in multiple Super Bowls. Too bad ownership messed everything up by not buying him any protection. I hope he comes back, but so much time has been wasted.

Originally posted by RishikeshA:
Back in 2013, when we were still elite under Harbaugh, Luck and the Colts came into San Francisco and tore apart the 49ers 27-7. He was such a presence, I figured this guy would be in multiple Super Bowls. Too bad ownership messed everything up by not buying him any protection. I hope he comes back, but so much time has been wasted.

I thought he had too many Turnovers to be good. He's had injuries and subpar numbers, and is still getting the chance to prove himself. Other......... Qb's don't get that much time, they get replaced or labeled injury prone, or unamerican.

I didn't catch the game, how did he do?

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Originally posted by jcs:

The Colts hired a Serbian landscaper?

At least there is no neck beard in this picture. That thing is nasty. Something about Andrew Luck has always brought to mind 'special needs' for me. It is the entire package, the way he looks and the way he talks. I certainly don't mean any disrespect either, that was just the best way for me to explain it.

Originally posted by Bluesbro:

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Originally posted by jcs:

The Colts hired a Serbian landscaper?

At least there is no neck beard in this picture. That thing is nasty. Something about Andrew Luck has always brought to mind 'special needs' for me. It is the entire package, the way he looks and the way he talks. I certainly don't mean any disrespect either, that was just the best way for me to explain it.

Dude is just captain caveman no matter what he tries so he may as well own it. Handlebars would be cooler though.

Uncle Rico

Originally posted by 49erWill:

I didn't catch the game, how did he do?

Wasn't great.

Originally posted by RishikeshA:

Back in 2013, when we were still elite under Harbaugh, Luck and the Colts came into San Francisco and tore apart the 49ers 27-7. He was such a presence, I figured this guy would be in multiple Super Bowls. Too bad ownership messed everything up by not buying him any protection. I hope he comes back, but so much time has been wasted.

That game was more on Roman than anything. Vernon didn't play, so there was pretty much one receiver on the field with talent, and he was short and slow (Boldin). Roman kept passing like an idiot, even though Gore gashed them when given the chance.

Luck wasn't impressive at all in that game, we just came with a stupid passing game plan when there was nobody to really pass to. They won by virtue of our offense doing nothing.

Originally posted by Debryune:
I thought he had too many Turnovers to be good. He's had injuries and subpar numbers, and is still getting the chance to prove himself. Other......... Qb's don't get that much time, they get replaced or labeled injury prone, or unamerican.

LOL. Most quarterbacks dont have that much time.

How many quarterbacks get replaced after 4.5 seasons which he averaged 30 touchdown passes per season?

Too many turnovers to be good? LMAO. Was Peyton Manning not good? He averaged 20 interceptions a game his first 4 years in the league (more than Luck). He had double digits interceptions 16 times in his career. SIXTEEN. He had 15 or more interceptions NINE times. If someone was to say Peyton Manning threw too many interceptions to be considered good, the only football conversation that person is qualified to talk about is uniform colors.

Andrew Luck is a stud. It always makes me laugh when I see people complain that he turns the ball over too much. He is literally trying to run an offense with zero running game and zero blocking, all while playing on a team with zero defense. Luck has to do everything. He is a one man team. If he doesnt play exceptionally well, the team loses. Puzzling how one could blame Luck for trying to make plays. He doesnt have the luxury of not attempting to be aggressive. That comes with mistakes. Put a solid team around him, and I bet you a healthy Luck is an MVP candidate.

Originally posted by Stud:

Originally posted by 49erWill:

I didn't catch the game, how did he do?

Wasn't great.

Thx

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by Debryune:
I thought he had too many Turnovers to be good. He's had injuries and subpar numbers, and is still getting the chance to prove himself. Other......... Qb's don't get that much time, they get replaced or labeled injury prone, or unamerican.

LOL. Most quarterbacks dont have that much time.

How many quarterbacks get replaced after 4.5 seasons which he averaged 30 touchdown passes per season?

Too many turnovers to be good? LMAO. Was Peyton Manning not good? He averaged 20 interceptions a game his first 4 years in the league (more than Luck). He had double digits interceptions 16 times in his career. SIXTEEN. He had 15 or more interceptions NINE times. If someone was to say Peyton Manning threw too many interceptions to be considered good, the only football conversation that person is qualified to talk about is uniform colors.

Andrew Luck is a stud. It always makes me laugh when I see people complain that he turns the ball over too much. He is literally trying to run an offense with zero running game and zero blocking, all while playing on a team with zero defense. Luck has to do everything. He is a one man team. If he doesnt play exceptionally well, the team loses. Puzzling how one could blame Luck for trying to make plays. He doesnt have the luxury of not attempting to be aggressive. That comes with mistakes. Put a solid team around him, and I bet you a healthy Luck is an MVP candidate.

I was gonna say , what QB has done as much as Luck and was cut?