There are 198 users in the forums

Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Shop 49ers game tickets
Originally posted by darockzillahitman:
And now we've got people actually trying to argue that Chris Hogan is a better receiver than Chad Johnson was. People can't seem to handle the fact that Bill Belichick has destroyed the game of football.

When one player is a phenomenal talent, as Johnson was, and the other is not, as Hogan is not (wouldn't start for any other team in football), and the guy without the talent is the guy who succeeds, simply because he understands the system, there's a problem.

Being a talented receiver doesn't just mean, "ran a fast 40-time." Otherwise, Usain Bolt would be an incredibly talented receiver if he decided to play football.

Chad Johnson was incredibly quick, could separate on the dime, and had phenomenal hands and acrobatic ability/ball skills. Hogan has none of those things going for him. All he has is knowing the system.

When he was 23, not when he was 33.
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Doesn't matter if he can't understand playbook...go look at how many uber athletes come out of the draft and suck. Everyone is athletic.

FYI hogan ran a faster 40 than Chad and is 20lbs bigger than him...they both are very good route runners, but one didn't get a real shot until he got to NE. (He was a UDFA brought in by SF actually).



Intelligence is not overrated. Rueben Randle is a guy who comes to mind. Physical ability was never his problem but the guy was either lazy, dumb or both.

In New York he frequently ran the wrong routes or cut off his routes early and the result too often wound up being a terrible looking interception to where people were like "LOL...Eli..."


It looked like he was throwing it straight to a defender when he was throwing it where his jar of rocks receiver was supposed to be all too often. Randle is now out of the NFL after having been an early draft pick.

Prefect example...another one that comes to mind is
dorial green-beckham (we all loved him in college), athletic freak but couldn't run a route. He's sitting on his couch somewhere as well.
Originally posted by communist:
Originally posted by darockzillahitman:
My definition of a "gimmick" in football is when it's physically easy. When it requires little talent to succeed. When the players who succeed in it are "products of a system."

Yeah, it could be mentally tough...but that just means you get the nerdier players instead of the physically talented ones. To me, that's everything that is wrong with sports. I watch sports to see great athleticism competing against great athleticism, not everything being about some coach outthinking the other one.

When Chris Hogan succeeds and Chad Johnson fails, that system is bad for sports.
lol, this is exactly how sports should NOT be and I am glad to see that the NFL does not care about superior athleticism.

you are referring to superior genetics. being successful based on that would be terrible. If you want to be successful, you have to be a superior person, you have to be determined, ambitious etc.... that is how universities and professional life are working (most of the time) and sports should not be different to that.

This. Steve Nash once said something along the lines of "If every player in the NBA worked like I do, I'd be out of a job"

The great thing about sports is that there is always an equalizer. Athletic players, smart players, skilled players, specialists, coaches, etc. There are so many factors, and that is what makes the sport hard. If every player was megatron, physically, there never would have been a megatron.
Originally posted by Niners816:
Originally posted by darockzillahitman:
There are many different ways to run a "drive," which can be any number of different route combinations. It's just a high/low concept. If that's how you wish to define "concept," then every single offense has this "concept" in their playbook, as well as every other, which would mean everybody is running the same system. But they're not.

And Vic Fangio agrees with me:

"The West Coast Offense that everyone claims they run, nobody really runs the West Coast Offense that Bill Walsh used to run. All these self-proclaimed West Coast Offenses really are not running Bill Walsh's offense. They use his nomenclature in defining and naming formations, but they're really not running the offense that he used to run. Everybody's taken their own version of it and put their own little mark on it, but to me, I don't see anybody running the West Coast Offense."

Nobody has ran Bill's offense in the nfl since he retired in Jan of '89. What Vic is saying is nobody is running Bill's offense. Nobody has ever denied that.

Those that say they are running a WCO are doing so because they subscribe to a philosophy of passing to set up the run and are using the verbiage associated with the WCO.

So Green Bay, uses WCO verbiage, obviously passes to set up the run and uses all the tried and true passing concepts. That my friend is a WCO. It just isn't Bill Walsh's offense just like NE E-P isn't the same as the one that Parcells was using in the 80s. Time change and the game adapts, but saying an offense isn't a WCO because it doesn't use the traditional red, brown and blue horizontal stack formations is ridiculous.

Passing to set up the run" doesn't define the system. That's just a silly little media narrative. Walsh himself didn't really pass to set up the run that much. There were years where his offenses were more run heavy than anything else, and plenty of games where he would come out trying to "establish the run."

Heck, people talk about Mike Shanahan as a "WCO" guy because of his time in SF, and define his Denver Broncos' offenses as "WCO," yet the main thing they loved to do was run to set up the bootleg.

Yeah, people who define systems are talking about "verbiage," but that's stupid, and that's the whole point. They're not the same systems. Not in any meaningful way.

What the Patriots run today is pure football-killing nonsense. That's why they take scrap heap players and go to the conference championship game every year, if not the Super Bowl.
Is this the garoppolo thread
Originally posted by defenderDX:
jesus christ has he put on weight. but that pic o him is enhanced.

nah he's a pudgy lil' b***h
Originally posted by darockzillahitman:
So you think Chris Hogan was a better wide receiver than Chad Johnson?
remember Stephen Hill, the draft crush of this board a couple of years ago (including myself). Athletic freak but besides that he got so apparently nothing to offer.
Originally posted by PowderdToastMn:
Originally posted by communist:
Originally posted by darockzillahitman:
My definition of a "gimmick" in football is when it's physically easy. When it requires little talent to succeed. When the players who succeed in it are "products of a system."

Yeah, it could be mentally tough...but that just means you get the nerdier players instead of the physically talented ones. To me, that's everything that is wrong with sports. I watch sports to see great athleticism competing against great athleticism, not everything being about some coach outthinking the other one.

When Chris Hogan succeeds and Chad Johnson fails, that system is bad for sports.
lol, this is exactly how sports should NOT be and I am glad to see that the NFL does not care about superior athleticism.

you are referring to superior genetics. being successful based on that would be terrible. If you want to be successful, you have to be a superior person, you have to be determined, ambitious etc.... that is how universities and professional life are working (most of the time) and sports should not be different to that.

This. Steve Nash once said something along the lines of "If every player in the NBA worked like I do, I'd be out of a job"

The great thing about sports is that there is always an equalizer. Athletic players, smart players, skilled players, specialists, coaches, etc. There are so many factors, and that is what makes the sport hard. If every player was megatron, physically, there never would have been a megatron.

Who said anything about working hard/not working hard?

The point is, athletics should not come down to freak'n brain power. This isn't chess.
The earliest I think he'll start is Seattle after the bye which should give him ample time to have enough of the offense down to at least run it at a functional level.

I don't buy the notion he won't play at all this season because the more reps he can take this season the better off he's going to be in 2018 and beyond and those reps are valuable enough that it's worth the injury risk. It's just up to Kyle to call plays that limit his exposure and not have him throw 50 times a game with long developing pass plays. Run the ball heavily and give him quick passes and bootlegs to keep the hits down.

The only reason Kyle is saying he might not play this season is it keeps his options open. He doesn't really know when Jimmy G is going to play so he'd rather keep his option open just in case he does for some reason not want to put him out there.
Originally posted by darockzillahitman:
Passing to set up the run" doesn't define the system. That's just a silly little media narrative. Walsh himself didn't really pass to set up the run that much. There were years where his offenses were more run heavy than anything else, and plenty of games where he would come out trying to "establish the run."

Heck, people talk about Mike Shanahan as a "WCO" guy because of his time in SF, and define his Denver Broncos' offenses as "WCO," yet the main thing they loved to do was run to set up the bootleg.

Yeah, people who define systems are talking about "verbiage," but that's stupid, and that's the whole point. They're not the same systems. Not in any meaningful way.

What the Patriots run today is pure football-killing nonsense. That's why they take scrap heap players and go to the conference championship game every year, if not the Super Bowl.

Don't forget to give credit to the wonderful division they play in every year. They don't have much competition during the regular season.
You guys keep talking about "athletic freaks," like when I talk about great athletes I'm just referring to combine numbers.

I'm talking about talent. When Steve Young can hit a specific molecule from 40 yards away while blindfolded, that's an athletic talent. When John Taylor can break 4 tackles after the catch, that's an athletic talent. When Jerry Rice can accelerate and leave people in the dust, that's an athletic talent.

When Chris Hogan runs into a vacated hole in the zone because of the play design killing the defensive play called and is wide open, that's not a talent.
Originally posted by darockzillahitman:
And now we've got people actually trying to argue that Chris Hogan is a better receiver than Chad Johnson was. People can't seem to handle the fact that Bill Belichick has destroyed the game of football.

When one player is a phenomenal talent, as Johnson was, and the other is not, as Hogan is not (wouldn't start for any other team in football), and the guy without the talent is the guy who succeeds, simply because he understands the system, there's a problem.

Being a talented receiver doesn't just mean, "ran a fast 40-time." Otherwise, Usain Bolt would be an incredibly talented receiver if he decided to play football.

Chad Johnson was incredibly quick, could separate on the dime, and had phenomenal hands and acrobatic ability/ball skills. Hogan has none of those things going for him. All he has is knowing the system.
BB didn't destroy anything. the lazy players you are referring to destroyed their careers through their own fault.
there is absolutely no problem with so called inferior talent being successful in a system. in any sports being a system fit is a must.
[ Edited by communist on Nov 1, 2017 at 3:12 PM ]
Originally posted by darockzillahitman:
Who said anything about working hard/not working hard?

The point is, athletics should not come down to freak'n brain power. This isn't chess.

The point is that there are always guys who will be smarter and there will be guys who are more athletic. That's called being human. Chris Hogan still has to run his routes and get open, which he does. I guarantee that guy is a lot more athletic than he's being given credit for.
Originally posted by darockzillahitman:
And now we've got people actually trying to argue that Chris Hogan is a better receiver than Chad Johnson was. People can't seem to handle the fact that Bill Belichick has destroyed the game of football.

When one player is a phenomenal talent, as Johnson was, and the other is not, as Hogan is not (wouldn't start for any other team in football), and the guy without the talent is the guy who succeeds, simply because he understands the system, there's a problem.

Being a talented receiver doesn't just mean, "ran a fast 40-time." Otherwise, Usain Bolt would be an incredibly talented receiver if he decided to play football.

Chad Johnson was incredibly quick, could separate on the dime, and had phenomenal hands and acrobatic ability/ball skills. Hogan has none of those things going for him. All he has is knowing the system.

Who is saying hogan is a better wr then Chad? That's silly, he was into his 11th seaon when he went to NE. He didn't have his crazy athletic ability anymore and wasn't smart enough to understand the system plain and simple.... Stop acting like hogan is some unauthentic WR, he's more than fast for his size and one of the things that he actually is very very good at is getting separation and route running.

Jerry rice was never the biggest/fastest WR, but dude had crazy work eithic...but I guess you hated him too, him and Montana ruined the game with their work ethic and smarts....bill belichick is basically Walsh and is smarter than everyone else with schemes but he sucks based on what you're saying
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Prefect example...another one that comes to mind is
dorial green-beckham (we all loved him in college), athletic freak but couldn't run a route. He's sitting on his couch somewhere as well.

Are you saying we should bring him in ?
Share 49ersWebzone