Originally posted by Giedi:Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by TheWooLick:It must be Passive Aggressive Friday.
Why not sack up and tell me how you disagree?
You and others are discussing Kyle and Lynch moving on from JG. It won't happen because it would cost them their jobs unless Mullens turned into a top 10 FQB.
So what you just want to argue? I'll I've stated is financially they can move off JG in a yr very easily.
I think kyle is a good god damn coach and he would get scooped up in a heartbeat if we let him go. I'm not firing him if JG doesn't turn into our FQB. If you disagree that's fine.
Lynch wasn't my pick for GM, he's very good at the PR stuff but I wouldn't hate it they decided to upgrade there.
I think Lynch has been a good GM for Kyle, basically Lynch is Kyle's right hand man regarding scouting and talent acquisition. He basically does what Kyle tells him to do. (example: Joe Williams) As long as Kyle lets John work on the defensive side and Kyle stays on the offensive side (generally speaking) it's going to be a good GM/HC team. I don't want another HarBaalke kind of relationship where a New GM doesn't get along with Kyle.
Originally posted by Giedi:I think Lynch has been a good GM for Kyle, basically Lynch is Kyle's right hand man regarding scouting and talent acquisition. He basically does what Kyle tells him to do. (example: Joe Williams) As long as Kyle lets John work on the defensive side and Kyle stays on the offensive side (generally speaking) it's going to be a good GM/HC team. I don't want another HarBaalke kind of relationship where a New GM doesn't get along with Kyle.
Yup, another Harbaw/ Baalke dust up , where there was obvious friction between the two...GM and HC..., is not conducive to producing a good team. And as it turned out...we didh't.