Originally posted by sacniner:
Originally posted by OnTheClock:
While it's debatable whether Jimmy at full strength is the best we can do, this clearly isn't the real Jimmy. He was out there because he was the best option we had when healthy -- but that's the problem. He's not. Play to play, game to game, the inconsistency is maddening. The more weapons we lose, the more we have no chance to scheme around his injury-driven restrictions. That negative paired with his other flaws or limitations are an absolute recipe for disaster.
Mullens delivered some deep dimes yesterday which made my eyes bug out a little. He beat the blitz more often. These are things Jimmy can do when healthy, but even then, it's not consistent. The fact that -- even at his best -- Jimmy isn't that much better than Mullens at his best (at least in some areas), that really shows we've got a major problem.
I don't know how bad Jimmy has to be for us to move on. I just hope whatever happens, we don't look back thinking "what if" while being stuck with mid-tier player who may not ever surpass that level.
Great post. Best one in the thread since yesterday's debacle
I mean, it's a real concern. Jimmy's advantage is he usually is better at choosing the right receiver to throw to. And he will at least try to run sometimes. Mullens I'd argue seems to have a more accurate deep ball now and beats the blitz better, but is FAR more prone to just throw it up for grabs if nothing's there. He hangs in the pocket better too, but again, tunnel vision sometimes and will get stripped or VERY close to getting stripped.
I don't think any QB on our roster is really the answer. Both Nick and Jimmy are inconsistent. And all three QBs on our roster are turnover prone at times.