Report: Nick Sorensen will not return as 49ers' defensive coordinator →

There are 329 users in the forums

Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Shop 49ers game tickets
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Niner4ever:
Look I don't think Mullens is anything but he is better than Beathard who would have been rocked into oblivion because he is even less mobile than Garoppolo. Trust the coaches they know a little something too.

I saw potentially one more interception down the sideline where he overthrew Reed. But that's part of football every single week for every QB.

As for Samuel that's what this offense does no matter what QB is behind Center LOL.

Yeah, Mullens is a back up at best but defenses are paid to play too. It's not a plug and play thing like some think. Just ask Goff who is better than anything on this team currently.

Mullens is straight crap. Beathard is straight cap (I actually think he's the most mobile of the bunch, he just can't process the field quick enough).

Really not much to debate with either guy they're both 💩
You're wrong about Beathard he is immobile and slow to process.

Yeah, Mullens and Beathard are both crap and Garoppolo is middle of the pack.

This team won a game yesterday with a crap back up that didn't lose the game and people are still whinning.
[ Edited by Niner4ever on Nov 30, 2020 at 11:23 AM ]
Originally posted by NYniner85:
I wouldn't say helped lol.

Dude should have had two more INTs. Missed open Receivers. I think like 100 of deebo's 133 yards were after the catch lol.

They won despite of the QB play.

Cmon NY you know wins and losses come down to 1 man — the QB. Figured these guy's woulda taught you by now
[ Edited by CharlieSheen on Nov 30, 2020 at 11:20 AM ]
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
He's better than Mullens but no way is he a top 10 QB. Maybe not even top 15 but comparing him to Mullens I can see how you could say that. problem is Mullens isn't even a top 32.

Definitely top 10 considering the deficiencies he's masked in our line for over two years. Lot's of people didn't see it at the time but he took a very meh pass pro line with a depleted and suspect interior to the SB.
Originally posted by NCommand:
Like? And how far have they gone? Like we see with Seattle every single year, it usually catches up to you and you can only go so far.

Houston, Seattle, Ravens, Carolina, etc.

I agree the landscape is changing and we're going to see a few more this year: Bills, Miami, Cleveland and Arizona in the mix too.

Is this the formula for winning a Superbowl though? That's our goal.

You still have the traditional formulas still in the hunt: KC, Tampa Bay, New Orleans, SF, Rams, MN, WA, LV, TN, IND, Pitt, etc.

The formula for winning over the past couple yrs (outside of NE) has been having a young QB on a rookie contract and building around him. You also need a top end coaching staff.

Again plenty of QBs making plays week in week out without having elite lineman across the OL.

I'm not saying don't upgrade the OL... never have said that. I'm saying you don't have to spend a billion dollars on IOL help. You don't have burn a top 32 pick on guard. That's been my debate with you for yrs now.

If Jimmy is the long-term FQB like some in here are proclaiming. Sign him to an extension to lower the cap next yr. If he was the man, it would be a no brainer....a lot of push back on that scenario in here even among the Jimmy fans. If he's not the future then go get the guy you think WILL be....go sign a vet on the interior with that freed up cash. Resign the guys you want here long-term. Rookie QBs are doing their thing in the NFL now, especially with the right roster & coaching staff.
[ Edited by NYniner85 on Nov 30, 2020 at 11:33 AM ]
Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
I wouldn't say helped lol.

Dude should have had two more INTs. Missed open Receivers. I think like 100 of deebo's 133 yards were after the catch lol.

They won despite of the QB play.

Cmon NY you know wins and losses come down to 1 man — the QB. Figured these guy's woulda taught you by now

My bad
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by NCommand:
There's like 1 QB in the entire league who can make up for piss poor consistent pass protection and even he hasn't been back to a Superbowl despite being in the hunt annually for league MVP.

If you're counting on a QB to makes up for the current standard of unit pass protection issues here, the odds are massively against you.

Lol no there's about a dozen QBs who make up for less then stellar OL play.

We saw Jimmy G do a great job of it in 2019.
Originally posted by Niner4ever:
You're wrong about Beathard he is immobile and slow to process.

Yeah, Mullens and Beathard are both crap and Garoppolo is middle of the pack.

This team won a game yesterday with a crap back up that didn't lose the game and people are still whinning.

Where am I whining lol? Saying Mullens played awful is a observation and it was pretty obvious. Him being the starting QB wasn't the reason for that W IMO. Dude did more harm then good.

FWIW here's Beathard taking a 62 yard run to the house lol




Beathard blows, he's not immobile.
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
We saw Jimmy G do a great job of it in 2019.

So you're telling me QB play improves PP? Thank you

I'd also say playing with our 4th string C and 3rd string rookie OT converted RG plays a part too.
[ Edited by NYniner85 on Nov 30, 2020 at 11:44 AM ]
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Where am I whining lol? Saying Mullens played awful is a observation and it was pretty obvious. Him being the starting QB wasn't the reason for that W IMO. Dude did more harm then good.

FWIW here's Beathard taking a 62 yard run to the house lol



Beathard blows, he's not immobile.
Are those first string defenses? Those two clips show he's probably lucky not mobile. Every time he's gotten the nod he's gotten blasted.
[ Edited by Niner4ever on Nov 30, 2020 at 12:01 PM ]
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
We saw Jimmy G do a great job of it in 2019.

So you're telling me QB play improves PP? Thank you

I'd also say playing with our 4th string C and 3rd string rookie OT converted RG plays a part too.

QB can help, yes. So does having good players on the OL.
I am not convinced a Shanahan picked rookie could do any better at making the line look decent than JG.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Like? And how far have they gone? Like we see with Seattle every single year, it usually catches up to you and you can only go so far.

Houston, Seattle, Ravens, Carolina, etc.

I agree the landscape is changing and we're going to see a few more this year: Bills, Miami, Cleveland and Arizona in the mix too.

Is this the formula for winning a Superbowl though? That's our goal.

You still have the traditional formulas still in the hunt: KC, Tampa Bay, New Orleans, SF, Rams, MN, WA, LV, TN, IND, Pitt, etc.

The formula for winning over the past couple yrs (outside of NE) has been having a young QB on a rookie contract and building around him. You also need a top end coaching staff.

Again plenty of QBs making plays week in week out without having elite lineman across the OL.

I'm not saying don't upgrade the OL... never have said that. I'm saying you don't have to spend a billion dollars on IOL help. You don't have burn a top 32 pick on guard. That's been my debate with you for yrs now.

If Jimmy is the long-term FQB like some in here are proclaiming. Sign him to an extension to lower the cap next yr. If he was the man, it would be a no brainer....a lot of push back on that scenario in here even among the Jimmy fans. If he's not the future then go get the guy you think WILL be....go sign a vet on the interior with that freed up cash. Resign the guys you want here long-term. Rookie QBs are doing their thing in the NFL now, especially with the right roster & coaching staff.

That seems like a stretch to act like the secret sauce is having a rookie QB on his first contract.

In the last 10 years the only teams who had a QB on his rookie contract who started in the SB for them were

Patrick Mahomes, Russell Wilson and Joe Flacco

I'd say two of those guys are elite level QBs so you can make an equal point saying find yourself an elite QB and you'll win SBs or play the 49ers in the SB with a rookie QB :(

Brady x 3 - not a rookie
Manning - his retirement season
Eli Manning - not a rookie
Aaron Rodgers - not a rookie
Brees - not a rookie

If you can find a QB like Mahomes or Wilson while having the elite level units both of those guys had around them while they were on those rookie contracts then yeah...that's fantastic.

But that's definitely a stretch that the contract is the key factor. It's only a factor if you have your key players up for contracts. For instance last year Jimmy's contract wasn't an issue because our key guys weren't up for new deals.

And once again the reason people aren't saying sign Garoppolo to long term deal is because he's been injured on his last deal more often than he's been healthy.
damn Mullens is going to be the achilles heel of this team. We need to at least win 4 of the next 5 games to even have a chance at the playoffs. Its possible but Mullens needs to up his game. Ive been reading in some articles that Garappolo could be activated from the IR any week now. Anyone heard anything encouraging about his timeline to return?
Originally posted by RasSuar:
Definitely top 10 considering the deficiencies he's masked in our line for over two years. Lot's of people didn't see it at the time but he took a very meh pass pro line with a depleted and suspect interior to the SB.

You could say Kyle took a very meh QB and made him look better with short passing and a strong running game that protected and hid his weaknesses.
  • Antix
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 9,842
Originally posted by JustinNiner:
damn Mullens is going to be the achilles heel of this team. We need to at least win 4 of the next 5 games to even have a chance at the playoffs. Its possible but Mullens needs to up his game. Ive been reading in some articles that Garappolo could be activated from the IR any week now. Anyone heard anything encouraging about his timeline to return?

If we're counting on Jimmy he needs to come back the Dallas game. Then we only need Mullens to beat Washington which is doable. I doubt we can beat Buffalo unless Mullens plays outta his mind.

But getting Jimmy back against Dallas allows him to have his usual bad first game against a team we should beat anyway. We also need to stay healthy otherwise and get Kittle back.
Originally posted by Niner4ever:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Where am I whining lol? Saying Mullens played awful is a observation and it was pretty obvious. Him being the starting QB wasn't the reason for that W IMO. Dude did more harm then good.

FWIW here's Beathard taking a 62 yard run to the house lol



Beathard blows, he's not immobile.
Are those first string defenses? Those two clips show he's probably lucky not mobile. Every time he's gotten the nod he's gotten blasted.

wait so moving around is luck now? It's not like he's running against the wind dude lol. I never said he was good, he processes everything entirely too slow that's why he gets smashed....he doesn't get rid of the ball fast enough. Doesn't mean he's immobile though.
Search Share 49ersWebzone