Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
When healthy he's a top 10-15 QB I'd put in in the same category as a Dereck Carr, Tony Romo, Eli Manning, etc. that's more than enough for a team to compete for Super Bowls every year

And kyle and Co. disagree

On the contrary,they don't.

Do you think they spent 3 first round picks on Trey Lance to replace Nick Mullens and CJ Beathard? They don't want Jimmy and it's not just injury related. Teams don't move on from a QB if they believe he's a top 10 QB, even if they have missed 2 of the last 3 seasons.

So why did the Colts move on from Peyton Manning after he missed 1 full season? The Jimmy injuries have been a death sentence to the team every time. I don't blame them for trying to move on, just wish it wasn't Trey Lance

Peyton was 36 at a time where that was considered near the end of a QB's career. Jimmy is 29. It's not the same thing. The Colts didn't give up on Andrew Luck despite his injury problems.

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Lmfao they traded a 2nd round pick for him and in return they got relevance and a super bowl appearance.

Or they spent $100M on a QB who's played one full season and played on a roster than could have had about 15 + other QBs get them to the SB all the same, guess it's all how you want to look at it.

Lol you'll say anything to not give Jimmy his due credit for that season.whatever you can say to push your "hes a noodle armed statue" agenda. Yeah the injuries suck no doubt , if Jimmy actually played those seasons the Niners are at worse a Wildcard team, but we also wouldn't of gotten Nick Bosa so it is what it is I guess

lol.. Ny counters everything that might shed some light of positivity on Jimmy lol

but nope, no hate

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
When healthy he's a top 10-15 QB I'd put in in the same category as a Dereck Carr, Tony Romo, Eli Manning, etc. that's more than enough for a team to compete for Super Bowls every year

And kyle and Co. disagree

On the contrary,they don't.

Troll

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
When healthy he's a top 10-15 QB I'd put in in the same category as a Dereck Carr, Tony Romo, Eli Manning, etc. that's more than enough for a team to compete for Super Bowls every year

And kyle and Co. disagree

On the contrary,they don't.

Troll

k Mr. He cant throw a pass over 15 yards
imagine being called a troll for defending the starting QB on a teams fan forum

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
When healthy he's a top 10-15 QB I'd put in in the same category as a Dereck Carr, Tony Romo, Eli Manning, etc. that's more than enough for a team to compete for Super Bowls every year

And kyle and Co. disagree

On the contrary,they don't.

Do you think they spent 3 first round picks on Trey Lance to replace Nick Mullens and CJ Beathard? They don't want Jimmy and it's not just injury related. Teams don't move on from a QB if they believe he's a top 10 QB, even if they have missed 2 of the last 3 seasons.

So why did the Colts move on from Peyton Manning after he missed 1 full season? The Jimmy injuries have been a death sentence to the team every time. I don't blame them for trying to move on, just wish it wasn't Trey Lance

Peyton was 36 at a time where that was considered near the end of a QB's career. Jimmy is 29. It's not the same thing. The Colts didn't give up on Andrew Luck despite his injury problems.

After coming off a very serious neck injury. I don't know how he can even compare those two

And you're spot on about Luck. If Jimmy was an elite talent, we would not have moved on that quickly. Teams stick with great QBs, even if they have some injury problems, and try to build a better OL for them.

Kyle chose to move on from Jimmy.

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
When healthy he's a top 10-15 QB I'd put in in the same category as a Dereck Carr, Tony Romo, Eli Manning, etc. that's more than enough for a team to compete for Super Bowls every year

And kyle and Co. disagree

On the contrary,they don't.

Do you think they spent 3 first round picks on Trey Lance to replace Nick Mullens and CJ Beathard? They don't want Jimmy and it's not just injury related. Teams don't move on from a QB if they believe he's a top 10 QB, even if they have missed 2 of the last 3 seasons.

So why did the Colts move on from Peyton Manning after he missed 1 full season? The Jimmy injuries have been a death sentence to the team every time. I don't blame them for trying to move on, just wish it wasn't Trey Lance

Peyton was 36 at a time where that was considered near the end of a QB's career. Jimmy is 29. It's not the same thing. The Colts didn't give up on Andrew Luck despite his injury problems.

After coming off a very serious neck injury. I don't know how he can even compare those two

And you're spot on about Luck. If Jimmy was an elite talent, we would not have moved on that quickly. Teams stick with great QBs, even if they have some injury problems, and try to build a better OL for them.

Kyle chose to move on from Jimmy.

Colts moved on when they Traded for Brisset ..but let the spin begin !!!

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
When healthy he's a top 10-15 QB I'd put in in the same category as a Dereck Carr, Tony Romo, Eli Manning, etc. that's more than enough for a team to compete for Super Bowls every year

And kyle and Co. disagree

On the contrary,they don't.

Do you think they spent 3 first round picks on Trey Lance to replace Nick Mullens and CJ Beathard? They don't want Jimmy and it's not just injury related. Teams don't move on from a QB if they believe he's a top 10 QB, even if they have missed 2 of the last 3 seasons.

So why did the Colts move on from Peyton Manning after he missed 1 full season? The Jimmy injuries have been a death sentence to the team every time. I don't blame them for trying to move on, just wish it wasn't Trey Lance

Peyton was 36 at a time where that was considered near the end of a QB's career. Jimmy is 29. It's not the same thing. The Colts didn't give up on Andrew Luck despite his injury problems.

After coming off a very serious neck injury. I don't know how he can even compare those two

And you're spot on about Luck. If Jimmy was an elite talent, we would not have moved on that quickly. Teams stick with great QBs, even if they have some injury problems, and try to build a better OL for them.

Kyle chose to move on from Jimmy.

Colts moved on when they Traded for Brisset ..but let the spin begin !!!

Holy s**t u can't be serious lmao

This is why NT always delivers

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
I don't recall anyone saying Goff sucked.
Being 10th is a lot different than being 1st.

He was top 3 this past season. 1% less then Jimmy in 2019. He's actually more accomplished then Jimmy at this point and not a single 49er fan thinks he's worth a damn.

Goff, Leading the league over the past two years in turnovers which includes interceptions and fumbles is laughable on such a stacked and loaded offense and great defense. As everyone that knows about football understands, TURNOVERS is the number one determining factor of wins and losses in this league, nothing else is close. Goff was probably the only reason the Rams lost so many games as they did. Where as Jimmy's injuries was probably the biggest determining factor of how the Niners lost their games not his play on the field when healthy. That is the main difference between these two quarterbacks and it's a big one. Let's not pretend that isn't the most important factor in all of football and Goff was the WORST at it. No sugarcoating it, No justifying it, no apologies for it, no spinning it. It's plain as day

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
When healthy he's a top 10-15 QB I'd put in in the same category as a Dereck Carr, Tony Romo, Eli Manning, etc. that's more than enough for a team to compete for Super Bowls every year

And kyle and Co. disagree

On the contrary,they don't.

Do you think they spent 3 first round picks on Trey Lance to replace Nick Mullens and CJ Beathard? They don't want Jimmy and it's not just injury related. Teams don't move on from a QB if they believe he's a top 10 QB, even if they have missed 2 of the last 3 seasons.

So why did the Colts move on from Peyton Manning after he missed 1 full season? The Jimmy injuries have been a death sentence to the team every time. I don't blame them for trying to move on, just wish it wasn't Trey Lance

Peyton was 36 at a time where that was considered near the end of a QB's career. Jimmy is 29. It's not the same thing. The Colts didn't give up on Andrew Luck despite his injury problems.

After coming off a very serious neck injury. I don't know how he can even compare those two

And you're spot on about Luck. If Jimmy was an elite talent, we would not have moved on that quickly. Teams stick with great QBs, even if they have some injury problems, and try to build a better OL for them.

Kyle chose to move on from Jimmy.

Colts moved on when they Traded for Brisset ..but let the spin begin !!!

Holy s**t u can't be serious lmao

This is why NT always delivers

and so it begins !

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
When healthy he's a top 10-15 QB I'd put in in the same category as a Dereck Carr, Tony Romo, Eli Manning, etc. that's more than enough for a team to compete for Super Bowls every year

And kyle and Co. disagree

On the contrary,they don't.

Do you think they spent 3 first round picks on Trey Lance to replace Nick Mullens and CJ Beathard? They don't want Jimmy and it's not just injury related. Teams don't move on from a QB if they believe he's a top 10 QB, even if they have missed 2 of the last 3 seasons.

So why did the Colts move on from Peyton Manning after he missed 1 full season? The Jimmy injuries have been a death sentence to the team every time. I don't blame them for trying to move on, just wish it wasn't Trey Lance

Peyton was 36 at a time where that was considered near the end of a QB's career. Jimmy is 29. It's not the same thing. The Colts didn't give up on Andrew Luck despite his injury problems.

After coming off a very serious neck injury. I don't know how he can even compare those two

And you're spot on about Luck. If Jimmy was an elite talent, we would not have moved on that quickly. Teams stick with great QBs, even if they have some injury problems, and try to build a better OL for them.

Kyle chose to move on from Jimmy.

Colts moved on when they Traded for Brisset ..but let the spin begin !!!

Holy s**t u can't be serious lmao

This is why NT always delivers

and so it begins !

Honestly, this comparison was even worse than AJs with Peyton Manning, and much worse than you comparing the NFL to a regular job.

You do understand that the Colts traded Phillip Dorset for Jacoby, and I believe the Colts also a got a pick in that trade. And that trade was done bc Luck had shoulder surgery and they didn't know if he would play that year, which they turned out to be right. They didn't spend 3 first round picks, and they didn't didn't get rid of Luck, he was there for 7 or 8 years, injury after injury, then he retired.

Ya a spin by you if anything. Now stop posting for today before you make another awful comparison.

Originally posted by elguapo:
Goff, Leading the league over the past two years in turnovers which includes interceptions and fumbles is laughable on such a stacked and loaded offense and great defense. As everyone that knows about football understands, TURNOVERS is the number one determining factor of wins and losses in this league, nothing else is close. Goff was probably the only reason the Rams lost so many games as they did. Where as Jimmy's injuries was probably the biggest determining factor of how the Niners lost their games not his play on the field when healthy. That is the main difference between these two quarterbacks and it's a big one. Let's not pretend that isn't the most important factor in all of football and Goff was the WORST at it. No sugarcoating it, No justifying it, no apologies for it, no spinning it. It's plain as day

We already went through this…Jimmy has a higher int % then Goff….JG is not even remotely close in passing attempts which gives more opportunities for fumbles/TOs. Jimmy in his only full season had 10 fumbles as well…when you're 20th in passing attempts, one of the lowest QBs in air yards AND highest in INT% that's an issue.

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
When healthy he's a top 10-15 QB I'd put in in the same category as a Dereck Carr, Tony Romo, Eli Manning, etc. that's more than enough for a team to compete for Super Bowls every year

And kyle and Co. disagree

On the contrary,they don't.

Do you think they spent 3 first round picks on Trey Lance to replace Nick Mullens and CJ Beathard? They don't want Jimmy and it's not just injury related. Teams don't move on from a QB if they believe he's a top 10 QB, even if they have missed 2 of the last 3 seasons.

So why did the Colts move on from Peyton Manning after he missed 1 full season? The Jimmy injuries have been a death sentence to the team every time. I don't blame them for trying to move on, just wish it wasn't Trey Lance

Peyton was 36 at a time where that was considered near the end of a QB's career. Jimmy is 29. It's not the same thing. The Colts didn't give up on Andrew Luck despite his injury problems.

After coming off a very serious neck injury. I don't know how he can even compare those two

And you're spot on about Luck. If Jimmy was an elite talent, we would not have moved on that quickly. Teams stick with great QBs, even if they have some injury problems, and try to build a better OL for them.

Kyle chose to move on from Jimmy.

Colts moved on when they Traded for Brisset ..but let the spin begin !!!

Holy s**t u can't be serious lmao

This is why NT always delivers

and so it begins !

Honestly, this comparison was even worse than AJs with Peyton Manning, and much worse than you comparing the NFL to a regular job.

You do understand that the Colts traded Phillip Dorset for Jacoby, and I believe the Colts also a got a pick in that trade. And that trade was done bc Luck had shoulder surgery and they didn't know if he would play that year, which they turned out to be right. They didn't spend 3 first round picks, and they didn't didn't get rid of Luck, he was there for 7 or 8 years, injury after injury, then he retired.

Ya a spin by you if anything. Now stop posting for today before you make another awful comparison.

damn all that to spin it huh

nothing of value or cost was said nor does it have any meaning here. you don't remember what you wrote?

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Lmfao they traded a 2nd round pick for him and in return they got relevance and a super bowl appearance.

Or they spent $100M on a QB who's played one full season and played on a roster than could have had about 15 + other QBs get them to the SB all the same, guess it's all how you want to look at it.

Lol you'll say anything to not give Jimmy his due credit for that season.whatever you can say to push your "hes a noodle armed statue" agenda. Yeah the injuries suck no doubt , if Jimmy actually played those seasons the Niners are at worse a Wildcard team, but we also wouldn't of gotten Nick Bosa so it is what it is I guess

when you realize your take is BS you revert to saying so and so is a hater…so typical and old.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
When healthy he's a top 10-15 QB I'd put in in the same category as a Dereck Carr, Tony Romo, Eli Manning, etc. that's more than enough for a team to compete for Super Bowls every year

And kyle and Co. disagree

On the contrary,they don't.

Do you think they spent 3 first round picks on Trey Lance to replace Nick Mullens and CJ Beathard? They don't want Jimmy and it's not just injury related. Teams don't move on from a QB if they believe he's a top 10 QB, even if they have missed 2 of the last 3 seasons.

So why did the Colts move on from Peyton Manning after he missed 1 full season? The Jimmy injuries have been a death sentence to the team every time. I don't blame them for trying to move on, just wish it wasn't Trey Lance

Peyton was 36 at a time where that was considered near the end of a QB's career. Jimmy is 29. It's not the same thing. The Colts didn't give up on Andrew Luck despite his injury problems.

After coming off a very serious neck injury. I don't know how he can even compare those two

And you're spot on about Luck. If Jimmy was an elite talent, we would not have moved on that quickly. Teams stick with great QBs, even if they have some injury problems, and try to build a better OL for them.

Kyle chose to move on from Jimmy.

Colts moved on when they Traded for Brisset ..but let the spin begin !!!

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Lmfao they traded a 2nd round pick for him and in return they got relevance and a super bowl appearance.

Or they spent $100M on a QB who's played one full season and played on a roster than could have had about 15 + other QBs get them to the SB all the same, guess it's all how you want to look at it.

Lol you'll say anything to not give Jimmy his due credit for that season.whatever you can say to push your "hes a noodle armed statue" agenda. Yeah the injuries suck no doubt , if Jimmy actually played those seasons the Niners are at worse a Wildcard team, but we also wouldn't of gotten Nick Bosa so it is what it is I guess

when you realize your take is BS you revert to saying so and so is a hater…so typical and old.

You refuse to give any credit to Jimmy and only focus at all the negativity. He ain't Aaron Rodgers and we don't need him to be. Jimmy has done wonders for this team whether you want to admit it or not. They went from unwatchable garbage to competitors overnight, and in return the "geniuses" of this fanbase treat him like he's Matt Cassel. You and so many others get sooo defensive about being labeled a hater but when users post horrible takes like, " Noodle arm statue", "trading for him blew up in the teams face", or even posting graphs trying to explain that 3rd downs aren't that important just so they can minimize one of Jimmy's positive traits, what the hell do you expect?. Do you even care if the team wins, or do you just want some "dual threat" QB ESPN will drool over so you can brag about it at family BBQs?

Jimmy is awesome and I'm thankful he's on the team, he was a 4th quarter colapse from being a Super Bowl MVP and going down as an all time great Niner. he's a damn good QB and has been a class act since he got here, worst thing he did was being seen with a pornstar by the paparazzi. While a certain other QB was sleeping with teammates GFs. Just thinking about the joke of QBs we've had since Young/Garcia, It's hard to not be thankful. I just wish he could stay healthy