Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Originally posted by TownNiner:

Originally posted by 49ersking:
The 49ers should start Jimmy G. If things go downhill for whatever reason (hope not), then Lance can start.

If Lance starts, and then things go downhill for whatever reason (hope not), and then Jimmy starts, it is a mess that neither Shanahan nor Lynch can get out off.

What DO they do in the last scenario? Literal nightmare scenario, right.

(Well actually the nightmare is them both totally sucking tiny little ant balls)

Originally posted by 49ersking:
The 49ers should start Jimmy G. If things go downhill for whatever reason (hope not), then Lance can start.

If Lance starts, and then things go downhill for whatever reason (hope not), and then Jimmy starts, it is a mess that neither Shanahan nor Lynch can get out off.

Originally posted by BeatWriter:
Question: Do you guys think we can beat the Seahawks or win the division with Jimmy as the starter?

I watching last years game in Seattle, and it seemed like they kinda figured him out. It wasn't until Mullens started pushing the ball that we started to gain some ground. But pushing the ball isn't our offense with Jimmy, its more horizontal than a vertical offense.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
then we follow WZ protocol and bash Trey

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by BeatWriter:
Question: Do you guys think we can beat the Seahawks or win the division with Jimmy as the starter?

I watching last years game in Seattle, and it seemed like they kinda figured him out. It wasn't until Mullens started pushing the ball that we started to gain some ground. But pushing the ball isn't our offense with Jimmy, its more horizontal than a vertical offense.

Stupid question

Stupid post

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by boast:

do you often make up stuff that people don't say and argue from the pov? lol.

as ive said over and over and over my view is that i dont think the team is interested in trading him and JG has a no trade clause anyway.

Making stuff up? You said people were calling him untraceable because those people were saying that because of his perceived performance.

So are you saying he isn't untradeable or that he is but for reasons other than his on field performance?

Originally posted by boast:
the untradeable comments made in the past were linked to his perceived performance

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
So we should follow the norm, when we don't have to and have an inferior back up ? Again, when we don't need to ! Lol

As I said before,...if there's a Julio Jones-type move you can make if you're confident in Trey,...you make it.

With Jimmy's contract and the (lack of) desire of other teams to take him,...we're really stuck in the mud because who'd take him is probably going to have to agree to pay him.

So if there's no players to make space for,...then there's no move to be made. If there are players to make space for and your starter is legit, then you dispose of him. It gives you a better chance at making it to the Super Bowl when a backup that likely won't play isn't hitting your cap @ a $20 Million clip. Just common sense.

But nothing wrong with having serviceable guys as backups on a good team. You posed the question as if it'd be a problem late in the season,...but it's the usual.

Originally posted by Jeepzilla:
Duhhhhhh
riddle me this… if I keep talking in circles will it still look like I was able to answer the question….

stay tuned for the next circle jerk

Originally posted by 49ersking:
The 49ers should start Jimmy G. If things go downhill for whatever reason (hope not), then Lance can start.

If Lance starts, and then things go downhill for whatever reason (hope not), and then Jimmy starts, it is a mess that neither Shanahan nor Lynch can get out off.

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by boast:

the untradeable comments made in the past were linked to his perceived performance

Lies. I've known his contract issues all along. Steve's seen me talk about his $20+ MIllion contract time after time in relation to trades or midseason addition it might prevent. You brought up the subject,....so it's only fair you answer Steve's question.

Originally posted by 49ersking:
The 49ers should start Jimmy G. If things go downhill for whatever reason (hope not), then Lance can start.

If Lance starts, and then things go downhill for whatever reason (hope not), and then Jimmy starts, it is a mess that neither Shanahan nor Lynch can get out off.

Originally posted by boast:
lies? i'm not even talking about you. man you guys gets so defensive. no doubt next you claim i'm emotional and i should calm down.

lol the Romper Room is the same as it was in '05

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by boast:
lies? i'm not even talking about you. man you guys gets so defensive. no doubt next you claim i'm emotional and i should calm down.

lol the Romper Room is the same as it was in '05

Lol,...of course you weren't.