Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
Made up stat
Googles what is average air yards
now your just googling what is IAY lol. Yeah next gen stats is just making stuff up. Your right avg depth of target isn't real life.
Hey man just say you don't like analytics. Just say you don't like any stat that doesn't make your hero look great, it's pretty clear you get super offend when anyone points out anything critical of him.
I guess I can just say any stat I don't like is made up
Ok... If I'm wrong show me the metrics that IAY means anything at all. Link me please to where IAY equates to points or anything... A single meaningful thing.
Lol Google doesn't even know
Bruh step up your google game. First, actually TYPE intended airyards per attempt. Second, put this next to it:
-fantasy.
That way you can get to the analytics sites that aren't interested in Fantasy Football.
Here's a quick Quara link. The first answer gives the rationale for the stat:
https://www.quora.com/What-does-the-NFL-statistic-Air-Yards-mean-What-is-its-significance
"One of the developments recently is the attempt to separate the contribution of the receiver from the contribution of the quarterback, so they can be evaluated separately. One way to do that is to separate a passing play into "air yards" (the distance covered while the ball is in the air) and "yards after catch" (the portion of the play the receiver runs after catching the ball).
Consider two 30 yard touchdown catches — a screen pass where the receiver runs it all the way in, or a bomb to a wide open receiver already standing in the end zone. The former would have 0 air yards and 30 yards after catch; the latter would have 30 air yards and 0 yards after catch. YAC seems to have caught on more quickly because it identifies receivers who are good at making their own space with the ball, but air yards matter as well — a quarterback who's got 300 yards by taking chances downfield is probably a better quarterback than a guy who got 300 yards passing by throwing a bunch of 5-yard slants that his receivers turned into big gains; they'd both have 300 yards passing at the end of the day, but the first guy would have more air yards."
Thank you!
For years one of the golden stats for a QB was YPA BUT that didn't account for YAC. air yards simply takes away the YAC. IAY shows avg depth of each passing attempt regardless of completion.
Like every damn stat our there, it's just another quantifiable data point we can use to evaluate a player
— a quarterback who's got 300 yards by taking chances downfield is probably a better quarterback than a guy who got 300 yards passing by throwing a bunch of 5-yard slants that his receivers turned into big gains; they'd both have 300 yards passing at the end of the day, but the first guy would have more air yards."
Lol "probably". It still explains nothing and says probably lol ffs
There is literally no stat that is the end all be all when it comes to quantifying a player.
Yet you guys focus 90% of your hatred on one stat. Like right now... What are we talking about? Again...
I don't understand how you keep missing the point. The stat DOES tell us SOMETHING — it tells us exactly what it's supposed to: how much the QB is contributing to the yards of an average pass play.
That's never going to perfectly correlate with winning or losing, because some teams which have low IAYPA have dominant WRs, some dominant run games, some dominant defenses; some teams with a high IAYPA have terrible WRs, or bad coaching/playcalling (Mike Martz at his worst), or a QB who is too aggressive (maybe Jay Cutler?).
All that stat tells us is something we OUGHT to already know (but for some reason the Jimmy stans do not): Jimmy has relied on WRs getting YAC more than any other starting QB. This is obvious based on the film, but again, it seems to escape notice.
So we point to this quantifiable stat to try to remove the self-adhered BLINDFOLD you guys have. And because it's quantifiable and not deniable, you claim it's a "fantasy" stat. But we wouldn't be here if you just opened your eyes.