There are 384 users in the forums

Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Shop 49ers game tickets
Originally posted by Joecool:
I always love these still shots and criticism on any QB throws while completely disregarding passing lanes, DL about to put up their hands or, in this case, a blitzing #36 ready to jump up to swat the ball right in front of the QB's face.

These QBs can barely see over the line no matter how tall they are let alone throw it over out stretched hands. Don't you all remember playing on the street with that one pass rusher counting alligators and you are always trying to throw around him rather than right into him? Well, these NFL QBs have 4 of those guys in front of them. The great ones like Brady completely understand moving into passing lanes which is why they are so good at pocket movement. The inexperienced ones stay in one spot in the pocket for as long as they can until a lane or a throw comes open. The runners just say f**k it, I'm running out of the pocket and then throwing.

Jimmy is still inexperienced and doesn't understand the full effectiveness of moving into passing lanes, even if the pocket is nice.

Jimmy is not inexperienced. He has a eight years' worth of training camps and pre-seasons, as well as more than three years worth of starts (38). For comparison, Mahomes won the MVP in his FIRST year starting, Steve and Rodgers were Pro Bowlers in their 2nd year (well, Steve in his second as a 49er; not sure how much to count the Bucs), Favre was a Pro Bowler in his first year starting, Jeff Garcia was a Pro Bowler in year two as a starter, and so on.

At 8 years and 38 games, you are not inexperienced and there isn't much further for you to go in your development (only that which comes with being able to read a defense like a book, which happens later in a career).
[ Edited by 5_Golden_Rings on Nov 3, 2021 at 1:58 PM ]
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
it was accurate enough to hit the receivers hands and be caught.

/topic

It was high and behind on a slant…you don't throw the ball behind someone who's running the opposite way. Totally catchable but again not a accurate ball.

Different view shows it


already looked at this view. and another view. and another. and 15+ pages of discussions about it. and film breakdown from fans about it.

accurate enough, lol.

Accurate enough to be caught, sure. But that ball placement is what separates the really good QBs from the mediocre ones.

most of you in here think he's mediocre anyways so by his standards it's a well-thrown ball, no? bad drop.

Jimmy's made much better throws before. Mediocre means roughly average. That's kind of what he is. Average among the starters. Somewhere in the 14-22 range of QBs. And Deebo is making too much money to not catch that.

right but the consensus with Jimmy overall as a quarterback is mediocre, therefore, by that logic it was a good throw by his standards

I mean when I use the word mediocre to describe him, I mean, so-so, roughly average for starting QBs. And an average starting QB makes a slant. That was a BAD throw for Jimmy in fact, because JIMMY usually nails those.

I use the word mediocre to describe average as well. either way, Jimmy hit that pass. I'm not going to go crazy trying to decipher whether it was deemed bad, mediocre or not. just getting ridiculous at this point lol.

it's subjective. that's why this is so silly. the ball NAILED the receiver's hands. period. if you want to go back and forth and be all nit picky about exact, specific, myopic ball placement, then by all means have at it
[ Edited by SkyZer0 on Nov 3, 2021 at 2:00 PM ]
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
it was accurate enough to hit the receivers hands and be caught.

/topic

It was high and behind on a slant…you don't throw the ball behind someone who's running the opposite way. Totally catchable but again not a accurate ball.

Different view shows it


already looked at this view. and another view. and another. and 15+ pages of discussions about it. and film breakdown from fans about it.

accurate enough, lol.

Accurate enough to be caught, sure. But that ball placement is what separates the really good QBs from the mediocre ones.

most of you in here think he's mediocre anyways so by his standards it's a well-thrown ball, no? bad drop.

Jimmy's made much better throws before. Mediocre means roughly average. That's kind of what he is. Average among the starters. Somewhere in the 14-22 range of QBs. And Deebo is making too much money to not catch that.

right but the consensus with Jimmy overall as a quarterback is mediocre, therefore, by that logic it was a good throw by his standards

I mean when I use the word mediocre to describe him, I mean, so-so, roughly average for starting QBs. And an average starting QB makes a slant. That was a BAD throw for Jimmy in fact, because JIMMY usually nails those.

I use the word mediocre to describe average as well. either way, Jimmy hit that pass. I'm not going to go crazy trying to decipher whether it was deemed bad, mediocre or not. just getting ridiculous at this point lol.

it's subjective. that's why this is so silly. the ball NAILED the receiver's hands. period. if you want to go back and forth and beyond and be all nit picky about exact, specific, myopic ball placement, then by all means have at it

Why is that subjective? You KNOW damned well that ball should have led Deebo and not required him to contort his body. You KNOW that. I don't understand why people play this bs game.
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
it was accurate enough to hit the receivers hands and be caught.

/topic

It was high and behind on a slant…you don't throw the ball behind someone who's running the opposite way. Totally catchable but again not a accurate ball.

Different view shows it


already looked at this view. and another view. and another. and 15+ pages of discussions about it. and film breakdown from fans about it.

accurate enough, lol.

Accurate enough to be caught, sure. But that ball placement is what separates the really good QBs from the mediocre ones.

most of you in here think he's mediocre anyways so by his standards it's a well-thrown ball, no? bad drop.

Jimmy's made much better throws before. Mediocre means roughly average. That's kind of what he is. Average among the starters. Somewhere in the 14-22 range of QBs. And Deebo is making too much money to not catch that.

right but the consensus with Jimmy overall as a quarterback is mediocre, therefore, by that logic it was a good throw by his standards

I mean when I use the word mediocre to describe him, I mean, so-so, roughly average for starting QBs. And an average starting QB makes a slant. That was a BAD throw for Jimmy in fact, because JIMMY usually nails those.

I use the word mediocre to describe average as well. either way, Jimmy hit that pass. I'm not going to go crazy trying to decipher whether it was deemed bad, mediocre or not. just getting ridiculous at this point lol.

it's subjective. that's why this is so silly. the ball NAILED the receiver's hands. period. if you want to go back and forth and beyond and be all nit picky about exact, specific, myopic ball placement, then by all means have at it

Why is that subjective? You KNOW damned well that ball should have led Deebo and not required him to contort his body. You KNOW that. I don't understand why people play this bs game.

subjective on whether or not the pass was considered bad, mediocre, or good. it was good enough for me. super catchable. considered bad for you based off Jimmy's standards. not in my eyes. the receiver had to contort his body a bit. so what. lol.

grand scheme of things it's a small thing and doesn't matter. we had no turnovers or sacks or didn't punt. idc
[ Edited by SkyZer0 on Nov 3, 2021 at 2:03 PM ]
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
it was accurate enough to hit the receivers hands and be caught.

/topic

It was high and behind on a slant…you don't throw the ball behind someone who's running the opposite way. Totally catchable but again not a accurate ball.

Different view shows it


already looked at this view. and another view. and another. and 15+ pages of discussions about it. and film breakdown from fans about it.

accurate enough, lol.

Accurate enough to be caught, sure. But that ball placement is what separates the really good QBs from the mediocre ones.

most of you in here think he's mediocre anyways so by his standards it's a well-thrown ball, no? bad drop.

Jimmy's made much better throws before. Mediocre means roughly average. That's kind of what he is. Average among the starters. Somewhere in the 14-22 range of QBs. And Deebo is making too much money to not catch that.

right but the consensus with Jimmy overall as a quarterback is mediocre, therefore, by that logic it was a good throw by his standards

I mean when I use the word mediocre to describe him, I mean, so-so, roughly average for starting QBs. And an average starting QB makes a slant. That was a BAD throw for Jimmy in fact, because JIMMY usually nails those.

I use the word mediocre to describe average as well. either way, Jimmy hit that pass. I'm not going to go crazy trying to decipher whether it was deemed bad, mediocre or not. just getting ridiculous at this point lol.

it's subjective. that's why this is so silly. the ball NAILED the receiver's hands. period. if you want to go back and forth and beyond and be all nit picky about exact, specific, myopic ball placement, then by all means have at it

Why is that subjective? You KNOW damned well that ball should have led Deebo and not required him to contort his body. You KNOW that. I don't understand why people play this bs game.

subjective on whether or not the pass was considered bad, mediocre, or good. it was good enough for me. super catchable. considered bad for you based off Jimmy's standards. not in my eyes.

If you can name an NFL QB coach or QB guru NFL QBs go to that says it's better to put a slant there, where the WR has to contort his body, than in front of the WR so he can catch it in stride, I'll never post on this forum again.
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
it was accurate enough to hit the receivers hands and be caught.

/topic

It was high and behind on a slant…you don't throw the ball behind someone who's running the opposite way. Totally catchable but again not a accurate ball.

Different view shows it


already looked at this view. and another view. and another. and 15+ pages of discussions about it. and film breakdown from fans about it.

accurate enough, lol.

Accurate enough to be caught, sure. But that ball placement is what separates the really good QBs from the mediocre ones.

most of you in here think he's mediocre anyways so by his standards it's a well-thrown ball, no? bad drop.

Jimmy's made much better throws before. Mediocre means roughly average. That's kind of what he is. Average among the starters. Somewhere in the 14-22 range of QBs. And Deebo is making too much money to not catch that.

right but the consensus with Jimmy overall as a quarterback is mediocre, therefore, by that logic it was a good throw by his standards

I mean when I use the word mediocre to describe him, I mean, so-so, roughly average for starting QBs. And an average starting QB makes a slant. That was a BAD throw for Jimmy in fact, because JIMMY usually nails those.

I use the word mediocre to describe average as well. either way, Jimmy hit that pass. I'm not going to go crazy trying to decipher whether it was deemed bad, mediocre or not. just getting ridiculous at this point lol.

it's subjective. that's why this is so silly. the ball NAILED the receiver's hands. period. if you want to go back and forth and beyond and be all nit picky about exact, specific, myopic ball placement, then by all means have at it

Why is that subjective? You KNOW damned well that ball should have led Deebo and not required him to contort his body. You KNOW that. I don't understand why people play this bs game.

subjective on whether or not the pass was considered bad, mediocre, or good. it was good enough for me. super catchable. considered bad for you based off Jimmy's standards. not in my eyes.

If you can name an NFL QB coach or QB guru NFL QBs go to that says it's better to put a slant there, where the WR has to contort his body, than in front of the WR so he can catch it in stride, I'll never post on this forum again.
he didn't have to contort anything lol.. these haters i swear
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
it was accurate enough to hit the receivers hands and be caught.

/topic

It was high and behind on a slant…you don't throw the ball behind someone who's running the opposite way. Totally catchable but again not a accurate ball.

Different view shows it


already looked at this view. and another view. and another. and 15+ pages of discussions about it. and film breakdown from fans about it.

accurate enough, lol.

Accurate enough to be caught, sure. But that ball placement is what separates the really good QBs from the mediocre ones.

most of you in here think he's mediocre anyways so by his standards it's a well-thrown ball, no? bad drop.

Jimmy's made much better throws before. Mediocre means roughly average. That's kind of what he is. Average among the starters. Somewhere in the 14-22 range of QBs. And Deebo is making too much money to not catch that.

right but the consensus with Jimmy overall as a quarterback is mediocre, therefore, by that logic it was a good throw by his standards

I mean when I use the word mediocre to describe him, I mean, so-so, roughly average for starting QBs. And an average starting QB makes a slant. That was a BAD throw for Jimmy in fact, because JIMMY usually nails those.

I use the word mediocre to describe average as well. either way, Jimmy hit that pass. I'm not going to go crazy trying to decipher whether it was deemed bad, mediocre or not. just getting ridiculous at this point lol.

it's subjective. that's why this is so silly. the ball NAILED the receiver's hands. period. if you want to go back and forth and beyond and be all nit picky about exact, specific, myopic ball placement, then by all means have at it

Why is that subjective? You KNOW damned well that ball should have led Deebo and not required him to contort his body. You KNOW that. I don't understand why people play this bs game.

subjective on whether or not the pass was considered bad, mediocre, or good. it was good enough for me. super catchable. considered bad for you based off Jimmy's standards. not in my eyes.

If you can name an NFL QB coach or QB guru NFL QBs go to that says it's better to put a slant there, where the WR has to contort his body, than in front of the WR so he can catch it in stride, I'll never post on this forum again.

not something i care to waste any more time over regarding 1 singular play in what was otherwise a pretty good game for the offense, for once this season. everybody could always have done something better.

Jimmy could've placed it slightly in front of deebo a couple inches more, or, a FOOT in front of him, and guess what? it's still entirely possible deebo STILL could have dropped it

why? cuz s**t happens!
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
it was accurate enough to hit the receivers hands and be caught.

/topic

It was high and behind on a slant…you don't throw the ball behind someone who's running the opposite way. Totally catchable but again not a accurate ball.

Different view shows it


already looked at this view. and another view. and another. and 15+ pages of discussions about it. and film breakdown from fans about it.

accurate enough, lol.

Accurate enough to be caught, sure. But that ball placement is what separates the really good QBs from the mediocre ones.

most of you in here think he's mediocre anyways so by his standards it's a well-thrown ball, no? bad drop.

Jimmy's made much better throws before. Mediocre means roughly average. That's kind of what he is. Average among the starters. Somewhere in the 14-22 range of QBs. And Deebo is making too much money to not catch that.

right but the consensus with Jimmy overall as a quarterback is mediocre, therefore, by that logic it was a good throw by his standards

I mean when I use the word mediocre to describe him, I mean, so-so, roughly average for starting QBs. And an average starting QB makes a slant. That was a BAD throw for Jimmy in fact, because JIMMY usually nails those.

I use the word mediocre to describe average as well. either way, Jimmy hit that pass. I'm not going to go crazy trying to decipher whether it was deemed bad, mediocre or not. just getting ridiculous at this point lol.

it's subjective. that's why this is so silly. the ball NAILED the receiver's hands. period. if you want to go back and forth and beyond and be all nit picky about exact, specific, myopic ball placement, then by all means have at it

Why is that subjective? You KNOW damned well that ball should have led Deebo and not required him to contort his body. You KNOW that. I don't understand why people play this bs game.

subjective on whether or not the pass was considered bad, mediocre, or good. it was good enough for me. super catchable. considered bad for you based off Jimmy's standards. not in my eyes.

If you can name an NFL QB coach or QB guru NFL QBs go to that says it's better to put a slant there, where the WR has to contort his body, than in front of the WR so he can catch it in stride, I'll never post on this forum again.
he didn't have to contort anything lol.. these haters i swear

Yeah he does. You can tell from the EZ angle. He is clearly having to bend his back, raise his hands, and slow to get it.

All you have to do to end this sort of commentary is say, "Yes, that pass should have been better." You can even add, "But even so, Deebo should have caught it." But you guys are incapable of the slightest criticism of Jimmy.
  • thl408
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 33,072
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
it was accurate enough to hit the receivers hands and be caught.

/topic

It was high and behind on a slant…you don't throw the ball behind someone who's running the opposite way. Totally catchable but again not a accurate ball.

Different view shows it


already looked at this view. and another view. and another. and 15+ pages of discussions about it. and film breakdown from fans about it.

accurate enough, lol.

Accurate enough to be caught, sure. But that ball placement is what separates the really good QBs from the mediocre ones.

most of you in here think he's mediocre anyways so by his standards it's a well-thrown ball, no? bad drop.

Jimmy's made much better throws before. Mediocre means roughly average. That's kind of what he is. Average among the starters. Somewhere in the 14-22 range of QBs. And Deebo is making too much money to not catch that.

right but the consensus with Jimmy overall as a quarterback is mediocre, therefore, by that logic it was a good throw by his standards

I mean when I use the word mediocre to describe him, I mean, so-so, roughly average for starting QBs. And an average starting QB makes a slant. That was a BAD throw for Jimmy in fact, because JIMMY usually nails those.

I use the word mediocre to describe average as well. either way, Jimmy hit that pass. I'm not going to go crazy trying to decipher whether it was deemed bad, mediocre or not. just getting ridiculous at this point lol.

it's subjective. that's why this is so silly. the ball NAILED the receiver's hands. period. if you want to go back and forth and beyond and be all nit picky about exact, specific, myopic ball placement, then by all means have at it

Why is that subjective? You KNOW damned well that ball should have led Deebo and not required him to contort his body. You KNOW that. I don't understand why people play this bs game.

subjective on whether or not the pass was considered bad, mediocre, or good. it was good enough for me. super catchable. considered bad for you based off Jimmy's standards. not in my eyes.

If you can name an NFL QB coach or QB guru NFL QBs go to that says it's better to put a slant there, where the WR has to contort his body, than in front of the WR so he can catch it in stride, I'll never post on this forum again.

not something i care to waste any more time over regarding 1 singular play in what was otherwise a pretty good game for the offense, for once this season. everybody could always have done something better.

Jimmy could've placed it slightly in front of deebo a couple inches more, or, a FOOT in front of him, and guess what? it's still entirely possible deebo STILL could have dropped it

why? cuz s**t happens!

s**t happened on the first play of the game. Slant pass, right Deebo's hands, one foot in front of the numbers - dropped.
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
it was accurate enough to hit the receivers hands and be caught.

/topic

It was high and behind on a slant…you don't throw the ball behind someone who's running the opposite way. Totally catchable but again not a accurate ball.

Different view shows it


already looked at this view. and another view. and another. and 15+ pages of discussions about it. and film breakdown from fans about it.

accurate enough, lol.

Accurate enough to be caught, sure. But that ball placement is what separates the really good QBs from the mediocre ones.

most of you in here think he's mediocre anyways so by his standards it's a well-thrown ball, no? bad drop.

Jimmy's made much better throws before. Mediocre means roughly average. That's kind of what he is. Average among the starters. Somewhere in the 14-22 range of QBs. And Deebo is making too much money to not catch that.

right but the consensus with Jimmy overall as a quarterback is mediocre, therefore, by that logic it was a good throw by his standards

I mean when I use the word mediocre to describe him, I mean, so-so, roughly average for starting QBs. And an average starting QB makes a slant. That was a BAD throw for Jimmy in fact, because JIMMY usually nails those.

I use the word mediocre to describe average as well. either way, Jimmy hit that pass. I'm not going to go crazy trying to decipher whether it was deemed bad, mediocre or not. just getting ridiculous at this point lol.

it's subjective. that's why this is so silly. the ball NAILED the receiver's hands. period. if you want to go back and forth and beyond and be all nit picky about exact, specific, myopic ball placement, then by all means have at it

Why is that subjective? You KNOW damned well that ball should have led Deebo and not required him to contort his body. You KNOW that. I don't understand why people play this bs game.

subjective on whether or not the pass was considered bad, mediocre, or good. it was good enough for me. super catchable. considered bad for you based off Jimmy's standards. not in my eyes.

If you can name an NFL QB coach or QB guru NFL QBs go to that says it's better to put a slant there, where the WR has to contort his body, than in front of the WR so he can catch it in stride, I'll never post on this forum again.
he didn't have to contort anything lol.. these haters i swear

Yeah he does. You can tell from the EZ angle. He is clearly having to bend his back, raise his hands, and slow to get it.

All you have to do to end this sort of commentary is say, "Yes, that pass should have been better." You can even add, "But even so, Deebo should have caught it." But you guys are incapable of the slightest criticism of Jimmy.
it's not anyone is incapable, it due to criticising the wrong guy here lol

looks like you are incapable of realizing that
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
it was accurate enough to hit the receivers hands and be caught.

/topic

It was high and behind on a slant…you don't throw the ball behind someone who's running the opposite way. Totally catchable but again not a accurate ball.

Different view shows it


already looked at this view. and another view. and another. and 15+ pages of discussions about it. and film breakdown from fans about it.

accurate enough, lol.

Accurate enough to be caught, sure. But that ball placement is what separates the really good QBs from the mediocre ones.

most of you in here think he's mediocre anyways so by his standards it's a well-thrown ball, no? bad drop.

Jimmy's made much better throws before. Mediocre means roughly average. That's kind of what he is. Average among the starters. Somewhere in the 14-22 range of QBs. And Deebo is making too much money to not catch that.

right but the consensus with Jimmy overall as a quarterback is mediocre, therefore, by that logic it was a good throw by his standards

I mean when I use the word mediocre to describe him, I mean, so-so, roughly average for starting QBs. And an average starting QB makes a slant. That was a BAD throw for Jimmy in fact, because JIMMY usually nails those.

I use the word mediocre to describe average as well. either way, Jimmy hit that pass. I'm not going to go crazy trying to decipher whether it was deemed bad, mediocre or not. just getting ridiculous at this point lol.

it's subjective. that's why this is so silly. the ball NAILED the receiver's hands. period. if you want to go back and forth and beyond and be all nit picky about exact, specific, myopic ball placement, then by all means have at it

Why is that subjective? You KNOW damned well that ball should have led Deebo and not required him to contort his body. You KNOW that. I don't understand why people play this bs game.

subjective on whether or not the pass was considered bad, mediocre, or good. it was good enough for me. super catchable. considered bad for you based off Jimmy's standards. not in my eyes.

If you can name an NFL QB coach or QB guru NFL QBs go to that says it's better to put a slant there, where the WR has to contort his body, than in front of the WR so he can catch it in stride, I'll never post on this forum again.

not something i care to waste any more time over regarding 1 singular play in what was otherwise a pretty good game for the offense, for once this season. everybody could always have done something better.

Jimmy could've placed it slightly in front of deebo a couple inches more, or, a FOOT in front of him, and guess what? it's still entirely possible deebo STILL could have dropped it

why? cuz s**t happens!

s**t happened on the first play of the game. Slant pass, right Deebo's hands, one foot in front of the numbers - dropped.

wait, is this the same play we are talkin about? was the ball in front of deebo enough?
  • thl408
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 33,072
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
it was accurate enough to hit the receivers hands and be caught.

/topic

It was high and behind on a slant…you don't throw the ball behind someone who's running the opposite way. Totally catchable but again not a accurate ball.

Different view shows it


already looked at this view. and another view. and another. and 15+ pages of discussions about it. and film breakdown from fans about it.

accurate enough, lol.

Accurate enough to be caught, sure. But that ball placement is what separates the really good QBs from the mediocre ones.

most of you in here think he's mediocre anyways so by his standards it's a well-thrown ball, no? bad drop.

Jimmy's made much better throws before. Mediocre means roughly average. That's kind of what he is. Average among the starters. Somewhere in the 14-22 range of QBs. And Deebo is making too much money to not catch that.

right but the consensus with Jimmy overall as a quarterback is mediocre, therefore, by that logic it was a good throw by his standards

I mean when I use the word mediocre to describe him, I mean, so-so, roughly average for starting QBs. And an average starting QB makes a slant. That was a BAD throw for Jimmy in fact, because JIMMY usually nails those.

I use the word mediocre to describe average as well. either way, Jimmy hit that pass. I'm not going to go crazy trying to decipher whether it was deemed bad, mediocre or not. just getting ridiculous at this point lol.

it's subjective. that's why this is so silly. the ball NAILED the receiver's hands. period. if you want to go back and forth and beyond and be all nit picky about exact, specific, myopic ball placement, then by all means have at it

Why is that subjective? You KNOW damned well that ball should have led Deebo and not required him to contort his body. You KNOW that. I don't understand why people play this bs game.

subjective on whether or not the pass was considered bad, mediocre, or good. it was good enough for me. super catchable. considered bad for you based off Jimmy's standards. not in my eyes.

If you can name an NFL QB coach or QB guru NFL QBs go to that says it's better to put a slant there, where the WR has to contort his body, than in front of the WR so he can catch it in stride, I'll never post on this forum again.

not something i care to waste any more time over regarding 1 singular play in what was otherwise a pretty good game for the offense, for once this season. everybody could always have done something better.

Jimmy could've placed it slightly in front of deebo a couple inches more, or, a FOOT in front of him, and guess what? it's still entirely possible deebo STILL could have dropped it

why? cuz s**t happens!

s**t happened on the first play of the game. Slant pass, right Deebo's hands, one foot in front of the numbers - dropped.

wait, is this the same play we are talkin about? was the ball in front of deebo enough?

No it's not the same play. I was talking about how Jimmy did put a slant pass to Deebo one foot in front and he still dropped it. Deebo's hands are inconsistent going back to his rookie year. Ah s**t, I'm a Deebo hater now.


Originally posted by TheGore49er:
Lol at Rodgers being in the same tier as Jimmy. Pass that stuff

facts. Rodgers hasn't really been very good this year. They're performing in a comparable fashion.

ANY/A DOES NOT LIE
Originally posted by davide49:
Originally posted by TheGore49er:
Lol at Rodgers being in the same tier as Jimmy. Pass that stuff

facts. Rodgers hasn't really been very good this year. They're performing in a comparable fashion.

ANY/A DOES NOT LIE

Not sure If serious.🤔
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by SkyZer0:
it was accurate enough to hit the receivers hands and be caught.

/topic

It was high and behind on a slant…you don't throw the ball behind someone who's running the opposite way. Totally catchable but again not a accurate ball.

Different view shows it


already looked at this view. and another view. and another. and 15+ pages of discussions about it. and film breakdown from fans about it.

accurate enough, lol.

Accurate enough to be caught, sure. But that ball placement is what separates the really good QBs from the mediocre ones.

most of you in here think he's mediocre anyways so by his standards it's a well-thrown ball, no? bad drop.

Jimmy's made much better throws before. Mediocre means roughly average. That's kind of what he is. Average among the starters. Somewhere in the 14-22 range of QBs. And Deebo is making too much money to not catch that.

right but the consensus with Jimmy overall as a quarterback is mediocre, therefore, by that logic it was a good throw by his standards

I mean when I use the word mediocre to describe him, I mean, so-so, roughly average for starting QBs. And an average starting QB makes a slant. That was a BAD throw for Jimmy in fact, because JIMMY usually nails those.

I use the word mediocre to describe average as well. either way, Jimmy hit that pass. I'm not going to go crazy trying to decipher whether it was deemed bad, mediocre or not. just getting ridiculous at this point lol.

it's subjective. that's why this is so silly. the ball NAILED the receiver's hands. period. if you want to go back and forth and beyond and be all nit picky about exact, specific, myopic ball placement, then by all means have at it

Why is that subjective? You KNOW damned well that ball should have led Deebo and not required him to contort his body. You KNOW that. I don't understand why people play this bs game.

subjective on whether or not the pass was considered bad, mediocre, or good. it was good enough for me. super catchable. considered bad for you based off Jimmy's standards. not in my eyes.

If you can name an NFL QB coach or QB guru NFL QBs go to that says it's better to put a slant there, where the WR has to contort his body, than in front of the WR so he can catch it in stride, I'll never post on this forum again.

not something i care to waste any more time over regarding 1 singular play in what was otherwise a pretty good game for the offense, for once this season. everybody could always have done something better.

Jimmy could've placed it slightly in front of deebo a couple inches more, or, a FOOT in front of him, and guess what? it's still entirely possible deebo STILL could have dropped it

why? cuz s**t happens!

s**t happened on the first play of the game. Slant pass, right Deebo's hands, one foot in front of the numbers - dropped.

wait, is this the same play we are talkin about? was the ball in front of deebo enough?

No it's not the same play. I was talking about how Jimmy did put a slant pass to Deebo one foot in front and he still dropped it. Deebo's hands are inconsistent going back to his rookie year. Ah s**t, I'm a Deebo hater now.



so basically deebo's drop with the pass that contorted his body earlier was more of a product of Deebo based off this evidence and the overall game he was having at this point, rather than his drop being product of Jimmy's BAD slant throw. got it.
Share 49ersWebzone