There are 331 users in the forums
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
Me too. Crazy how negative people can be mere hours before such a huge game.
Honest opinions wont change the outcome of the game. I never asked for Jimmy to be benched. If you've already done so, I wouldn't point fingers and try to take fan cards. Just discuss football.
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Someone asked why Jimmy gets love in here.
I reply that the reason is that the team is winning, and just came off a huge win in Dallas.
For some reason it triggers negativity from you and Random.
Why so salty about other fans being happy about winning and loving the team for it?
Since you said my name I guess this means I finally get a reply to this "clutch" and "choke" rhetoric stuff because you clearly were setting the rules on it one week,....only to disappear and not wanna discuss it the next week. Sooo count your willingness to discuss the keywords if nothing else...
POST RAMS GAME:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
so your point was to minimize what Jimmy did or excuse Stafford's choke job...in the Jimmy thread?
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
So Stafford is a great 4th QR comeback QB and is clutch? You can't have it both ways.
He isn't clutch.
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Why do you feel context was needed to temper the celebration of Jummy's clutch performance and why did you bring up Stafford?
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Nobody posted that stat other than NY and he did it in response to someone praising Jimmy's performance as clutch.
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
No, it isn't.
Everything is bot binary. Some folks recognize nuance.
Jimmy was clutch yesterday and Staffird choked, there wasn't much nuance there.
In the 1st half it was the complete opposite. Stafford was "clutch" (I guess,...they were already in the playoffs, lol) and Jimmy had choked.
One more unlucky bounce in the 4th and we're all in the draft forum eying who our 2nd rounder might be. Things are not as binary as you'd like them to be.
No, that isn't how choking or clutch work, lol.
Jimmy was clutch and won, Staffird choked and lost. The 49ers made the playoffs and the Rams lost HFA opportunities.
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by random49er:
Of course it is how clutch works. You can't keep crapping the bed in 1st halves and get to compare yourself to Joe Montana and Tom Brady,....lol.
Just doesn't add up. He was the opposite of clutch vs. Tenn and the 1st half of this game. Was able to tie the game up in the end vs. Tenn BUT WE LOST, RIGHT??
Nobody is comparing Jimmy to Montana.
We are just saying he was clutch yesterday and he has been in the past as well. Not so strange after the teams biggest win in a few years and after an epic come back.
Your argument is that Jimmy didn't come through in the clutch yesterday and it is weak.
AFTER COWBOYS GAME:
You said "1st halves don't matter",.....but the 1st half was pretty much what won the game for us. He gets no credit for the pressure to perform in the 1st half, according to your rules, right?
And if these ARE the rules (since you were adamant in setting them),... did Jimmy choke last week?
Let's try @ least one week where you commit to one or the other instead of waiting till the results, then making the rules.
Asking for consistency on this choke/clutch thing,...just like we'll ask out of our QB tonight.
(per Woo)Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Someone asked why Jimmy gets love in here.
I reply that the reason is that the team is winning, and just came off a huge win in Dallas.
For some reason it triggers negativity from you and Random.
Why so salty about other fans being happy about winning and loving the team for it?
Since you said my name I guess this means I finally get a reply to this "clutch" and "choke" rhetoric stuff because you clearly were setting the rules on it one week,....only to disappear and not wanna discuss it the next week. Sooo count your willingness to discuss the keywords if nothing else...
POST RAMS GAME:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
so your point was to minimize what Jimmy did or excuse Stafford's choke job...in the Jimmy thread?
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
So Stafford is a great 4th QR comeback QB and is clutch? You can't have it both ways.
He isn't clutch.
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Why do you feel context was needed to temper the celebration of Jummy's clutch performance and why did you bring up Stafford?
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Nobody posted that stat other than NY and he did it in response to someone praising Jimmy's performance as clutch.
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
No, it isn't.
Everything is bot binary. Some folks recognize nuance.
Jimmy was clutch yesterday and Staffird choked, there wasn't much nuance there.
In the 1st half it was the complete opposite. Stafford was "clutch" (I guess,...they were already in the playoffs, lol) and Jimmy had choked.
One more unlucky bounce in the 4th and we're all in the draft forum eying who our 2nd rounder might be. Things are not as binary as you'd like them to be.
No, that isn't how choking or clutch work, lol.
Jimmy was clutch and won, Staffird choked and lost. The 49ers made the playoffs and the Rams lost HFA opportunities.
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by random49er:
Of course it is how clutch works. You can't keep crapping the bed in 1st halves and get to compare yourself to Joe Montana and Tom Brady,....lol.
Just doesn't add up. He was the opposite of clutch vs. Tenn and the 1st half of this game. Was able to tie the game up in the end vs. Tenn BUT WE LOST, RIGHT??
Nobody is comparing Jimmy to Montana.
We are just saying he was clutch yesterday and he has been in the past as well. Not so strange after the teams biggest win in a few years and after an epic come back.
Your argument is that Jimmy didn't come through in the clutch yesterday and it is weak.
AFTER COWBOYS GAME:
You said "1st halves don't matter",.....but the 1st half was pretty much what won the game for us. He gets no credit for the pressure to perform in the 1st half, according to your rules, right?
And if these ARE the rules (since you were adamant in setting them),... did Jimmy choke last week?
Let's try @ least one week where you commit to one or the other instead of waiting till the results, then making the rules.
Asking for consistency on this choke/clutch thing,...just like we'll ask out of our QB tonight.
Woo??
And no,...you can't wait till halftime.
Football is a "loser go home sport" but I grew up watching things like baseball and basketball as well and I dunno,...but when you came through in a game 7 or whatever THROUGHOUT THE GAME,...including the 1st half....it was considered clutch.
W/football there aren't multiple games, so does this negate the whole clutch thing and it only counts at the end of games? (per Woo)
And if this is the rule, then did Jimmy choke last week?? BE CONSISTENT.
Originally posted by MoeJontana84:
He may be a roller coaster, but I hope the ride still goes on.
Let's get it, Jimmy.
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
Me too. Crazy how negative people can be mere hours before such a huge game.
Honest opinions wont change the outcome of the game. I never asked for Jimmy to be benched. If you've already done so, I wouldn't point fingers and try to take fan cards. Just discuss football.
Originally posted by RidetheHyde:
Originally posted by RidetheHyde:
Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
Lol Burrow is the only reason Tennessee is in this game. The double standards are hilarious.
U wanna bet how many postseason appearances after this season. Jimmy vs burrow 🤣🤣🤣
That didn't age well lmfao. That's a young qb CARRYING his team with zero help from his offensive line and run game. Jimmy isn't 25 percent of this kid lmfao
Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
I'll just stay away thanks. This place is really a downer. Suck this close to a big game but that's how it is.
Let's f* go!!!
Originally posted by ajsjohnson:
The truth is that we win way more games when he is the QB than when we have with other guys paying qb since he has been here. That is definitive proof that he impacts our chances of winning positively vs. those other guys. And yes, if we had a better QB presumably we would win more but we don't how good we can be with a stud QB yet--hopefully Lance is that QB. Rodgers is great but I would argue that the Niners locker room plays harder for Jimmy than anyone on the Pack does for Rodgers thanks to his douchey personality and arrogance--just a guess.
Originally posted by fan49:
Originally posted by ajsjohnson:
The truth is that we win way more games when he is the QB than when we have with other guys paying qb since he has been here. That is definitive proof that he impacts our chances of winning positively vs. those other guys. And yes, if we had a better QB presumably we would win more but we don't how good we can be with a stud QB yet--hopefully Lance is that QB. Rodgers is great but I would argue that the Niners locker room plays harder for Jimmy than anyone on the Pack does for Rodgers thanks to his douchey personality and arrogance--just a guess.
Sorry but definite proof of my ass. Mullins and Beathard were his replacements clear. They are bona fide third stringers. The only way you could say that's proof is there there was a legit starter that played instead of him. Trey Lance went one and one. You all want to give credit to Jimmy for the win but what about the defense in the running backs. Defense wins games. Offense fills the seats. Why all the sudden does he get credit By himself for the wins
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by ElDannMann:
Originally posted by random49er:
You obviously disagree with that part.
What other part do you disagree with?
Oh, I don't know, how they're only basing their assessments on his mistakes, not even considering all of the good QB play we see from Jimmy. Not once did they even mention anything good that Jimmy does.
People are blinded by bad Jimmy, they refuse to see good Jimmy.
You f**k one goat and people are going to focus on the fact that you're a goat f**ker no matter how much good you do.
Exactly why I stick to Nannies