Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by random49er:
Dont find it interesting at all. Hanging onto the every word of a GM has never helped me stay abreast of what's coming next on the team.

Their job isin't to telegraph their every move to the masses to be picked apart and strategically outdone.

Funny how you believe quotes when it suits you. He's not lying here like you claim every player and coach is. It's hypocritical.

Where did I say I believed the quote? Let me restate:

So he's lying?

Uninterested in deciphering if he's lying or not because as I just said (and I guess it needs to be said again):

Originally posted by random49er:
Hanging onto the every word of a GM has never helped me stay abreast of what's coming next on the team.
Their job isin't to telegraph their every move to the masses to be picked apart and strategically outdone.

But if you're claiming that every positive thing regarding Jimmy from him is 100% true,...then you have to go the same route for Trey,...don't you?

No he's not lying about Trey. He's being honest as he usually is yet the BOTB's call him a liar.

You're the one that's being a hypocrite... Unless of course you think he's lying about Trey. You won't answer that because it dismantles everything you've ever stood for in this thread.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by ChillninDaBay:
Another big reason why, other than the fact his shoulder is still Fed, the other NFL teams have not offer anything of significance if at all for Jimmy is they all know in order to pay deebo as well as completely moving on to Trey as the legitimate starting QB, 9ers need to dump Jimmy and his 26M+. Who knows they might just junk him for a 3rd or 4th or cut him before July..

Fact is, The NFL GMs and FOs are a bunch of scavenging vultures to put it mildly, all competing for 1 thing, wins and getting to the SB...

Deebo getting paid is COMPLETELY irrelevant to Jimmy being here or not. I thought we should have cut him a while ago so we could bring in other players with the $20M we would have available with Jimmy gone. But him being here or gone has absolutely no bearing on Deebo.

That 20+ mill will mostly be going to future contracts. 25+ mill for Bosa and potentially 23+ for Deebo.

We could easily have brought in a Stephon Gillmore type contract if we didnt have Jimmy on the roster. I'm not talking about giving someone a longterm contract with Jimmy's annual salary.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
No he's not lying about Trey. He's being honest.

Great. Better than they initially thought,...awesome.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
You're the one that's being a hypocrite... Unless of course you think he's lying about Trey.

Not being a hypocrite and not interested in whether or not he's lying about Trey. This is your interest.

Originally posted by random49er:
Not being a hypocrite and not interested in whether or not he's lying about Trey. This is your interest.

Lol checkmate.

Goodnight.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
No he's not lying about Trey. He's being honest.

Great. Better than they initially thought,...awesome.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
You're the one that's being a hypocrite... Unless of course you think he's lying about Trey.

Not being a hypocrite and not interested in whether or not he's lying about Trey. This is your interest.

Lol checkmate.

Goodnight.

Ha....loved the backhanded surrender. Still waiting on your replies to that post regarding Lynch from a month or 2 ago that u conveniently continue to skip over.

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
No he's not lying about Trey. He's being honest.

Great. Better than they initially thought,...awesome.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
You're the one that's being a hypocrite... Unless of course you think he's lying about Trey.

Not being a hypocrite and not interested in whether or not he's lying about Trey. This is your interest.

Lol checkmate.

Goodnight.

Ha....loved the backhanded surrender. Still waiting on your replies to that post regarding Lynch from a month or 2 ago that u conveniently continue to skip over.

Goalposts

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
No he's not lying about Trey. He's being honest.

Great. Better than they initially thought,...awesome.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
You're the one that's being a hypocrite... Unless of course you think he's lying about Trey.

Not being a hypocrite and not interested in whether or not he's lying about Trey. This is your interest.

Lol checkmate.

Goodnight.

Ha....loved the backhanded surrender. Still waiting on your replies to that post regarding Lynch from a month or 2 ago that u conveniently continue to skip over.

Goalposts

U already bailed out with the "checkmate/goodnite" surrender line yet you're still replying. That means you're not getting anywhere so you give up. But yes,...the goalposts are up for the next game.

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
No he's not lying about Trey. He's being honest.

Great. Better than they initially thought,...awesome.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
You're the one that's being a hypocrite... Unless of course you think he's lying about Trey.

Not being a hypocrite and not interested in whether or not he's lying about Trey. This is your interest.

Lol checkmate.

Goodnight.

Ha....loved the backhanded surrender. Still waiting on your replies to that post regarding Lynch from a month or 2 ago that u conveniently continue to skip over.

Goalposts

U already bailed out with the checkmate surrender. The goalposts are up for the next game.

You brought up quotes then when I challenged you, you said you didn't want to talk about quotes.

You lost. You then moved the goalposts.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
No he's not lying about Trey. He's being honest.

Great. Better than they initially thought,...awesome.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
You're the one that's being a hypocrite... Unless of course you think he's lying about Trey.

Not being a hypocrite and not interested in whether or not he's lying about Trey. This is your interest.

Lol checkmate.

Goodnight.

Ha....loved the backhanded surrender. Still waiting on your replies to that post regarding Lynch from a month or 2 ago that u conveniently continue to skip over.

Goalposts

U already bailed out with the checkmate surrender. The goalposts are up for the next game.

You brought up quotes then when I challenged you, you said you didn't want to talk about quotes.

You lost. You then moved the goalposts.

You still at this? Every statement that Lynch and Shanahan make are open ended. Its done on purpose so that they can never be called a liar. You highlight parts of the quote that suit your argument and completely ignore the rest. I have attempted many times to show you how easy it is for someone on the other end of the argument to do the same thing and you completely ignore that also. You aren't this dense, are you?

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
No he's not lying about Trey. He's being honest.

Great. Better than they initially thought,...awesome.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
You're the one that's being a hypocrite... Unless of course you think he's lying about Trey.

Not being a hypocrite and not interested in whether or not he's lying about Trey. This is your interest.

Lol checkmate.

Goodnight.

Ha....loved the backhanded surrender. Still waiting on your replies to that post regarding Lynch from a month or 2 ago that u conveniently continue to skip over.

Goalposts

U already bailed out with the checkmate surrender. The goalposts are up for the next game.

You brought up quotes then when I challenged you, you said you didn't want to talk about quotes.

You lost. You then moved the goalposts.

You still at this? Every statement that Lynch and Shanahan make are open ended. Its done on purpose so that they can never be called a liar. You highlight parts of the quote that suit your argument and completely ignore the rest. I have attempted many times to show you how easy it is for someone on the other end of the argument to do the same thing and you completely ignore that also. You aren't this dense, are you?

Provide examples...

You-"No"

Ok then be a liar. If you wanna accuse me of something back it up. What's parts do I ignore specifically?

You won't. You never ever do but you lie and and claim you do but here's your chance.

Is there a scenario where you see him still on the roster?

"Absolutely. I said at the owner's meetings, guys like that don't fall out of trees. He's a good player at a position where they're hard to find. And so, you certainly don't just give guys like that away and we can, I guess foot the bill, if you want to describe it as that. And so, we'll be patient with that one."

Open ended -

Open-ended questions are questions that cannot be answered with a simple 'yes' or 'no',

Is there a scenario where you see him still on the roster?

"Absolutely"

As I said the lengths you guys go to to just simply hate on players just shows that Sherman is right. You create literal conspiracies that Lynch saying "absolutely" literally saying and I quote "absolutely" is him not being truthful.

He's also said he more than willing to trade Jimmy for the right price. He's said it, Shanny has said it, York has said. You and others are the ones literally creating conspiracies by putting words in others mouth. Not me... I provide exact quotes. You provide conspiracy.

Now back your claim up like I just did. You won't... You and the other BOTB's will just respond with a smiley, one sentence, or passive aggressiveness as always.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
No he's not lying about Trey. He's being honest.

Great. Better than they initially thought,...awesome.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
You're the one that's being a hypocrite... Unless of course you think he's lying about Trey.

Not being a hypocrite and not interested in whether or not he's lying about Trey. This is your interest.

Lol checkmate.

Goodnight.

Ha....loved the backhanded surrender. Still waiting on your replies to that post regarding Lynch from a month or 2 ago that u conveniently continue to skip over.

Goalposts

U already bailed out with the checkmate surrender. The goalposts are up for the next game.

You brought up quotes then when I challenged you, you said you didn't want to talk about quotes.

You lost. You then moved the goalposts.

Why do you even bother? This guy will never concede anything even if you have all the evidence and are rubbing it in his face. Most just ignore

Just read our entire conversation over the past month or so. You just refuse to admit that those quotes are completely open ended which is the intention of those making the statements. No one stated that Jimmy will be on the roster at the start of the season. No one made a statement saying Jimmy will not be on the roster at the start of the season. You just choose to highlight which parts of the quotes enforce your argument and completely ignore the rest. It is disingenuous to do what you are doing.

The debate on here should really be about why we should keep him vs why we should dump him.

Originally posted by YACBros85:
Just read our entire conversation over the past month or so. You just refuse to admit that those quotes are completely open ended which is the intention of those making the statements. No one stated that Jimmy will be on the roster at the start of the season. No one made a statement saying Jimmy will not be on the roster at the start of the season. You just choose to highlight which parts of the quotes enforce your argument and completely ignore the rest. It is disingenuous to do what you are doing.

The debate on here should really be about why we should keep him vs why we should dump him.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
Provide examples...

You-"No"

Ok then be a liar. If you wanna accuse me of something back it up. What's parts do I ignore specifically?

You won't. You never ever do but you lie and and claim you do but here's your chance.

.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
Just read our entire conversation over the past month or so. You just refuse to admit that those quotes are completely open ended which is the intention of those making the statements. No one stated that Jimmy will be on the roster at the start of the season. No one made a statement saying Jimmy will not be on the roster at the start of the season. You just choose to highlight which parts of the quotes enforce your argument and completely ignore the rest. It is disingenuous to do what you are doing.

The debate on here should really be about why we should keep him vs why we should dump him.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
Provide examples...

You-"No"

Ok then be a liar. If you wanna accuse me of something back it up. What's parts do I ignore specifically?

You won't. You never ever do but you lie and and claim you do but here's your chance.

.

I have already provided them. They are still within this thread. You have chosen to ignore them. You continue to ignore them.

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
Just read our entire conversation over the past month or so. You just refuse to admit that those quotes are completely open ended which is the intention of those making the statements. No one stated that Jimmy will be on the roster at the start of the season. No one made a statement saying Jimmy will not be on the roster at the start of the season. You just choose to highlight which parts of the quotes enforce your argument and completely ignore the rest. It is disingenuous to do what you are doing.

The debate on here should really be about why we should keep him vs why we should dump him.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
Provide examples...

You-"No"

Ok then be a liar. If you wanna accuse me of something back it up. What's parts do I ignore specifically?

You won't. You never ever do but you lie and and claim you do but here's your chance.

.

I have already provided them. They are still within this thread. You have chosen to ignore them. You continue to ignore them.

Checkmate #2.

This is why Goatie.

He knows I'm right. He won't admit it. He can't even back his argument up with facts like I did. Just like random.

"You highlight parts of the quote that suit your argument and completely ignore the rest"

Me-Ok like when? We all know you won't back it up"

"I have I promise"

Me-No you haven't

Edit: if you actually do care to actually engage for once please provide the page number.