Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Finally finished my dorky QB rating metric. Jimmy surprised me a bit, finishing at 12th (I'm not fully amazed at this, but it's definitely the high end of the range where I tend to rank him).
https://www.49erswebzone.com/forum/nfl/196068-new-homegrown-rating-metric-jimmy-controversially-ranks-12th/
And Trey had a better rating, for the record (although with small sample sizes there will be large variations).
Each input in this rating is statistically tied directly to correlation with winning. The only divergence from this with rushing yards, which surprisingly has a very weak negative correlation with winning (But it made no football sense to not include it, and because it is statistically insignificant, I flipped the sign and did a separate correlation analysis for guys who rush for a lot if yards per game, and gave them a bonus based on the positive correlation with winning their rushing yards had.)
Other than that, I made sacks and dominant wins 25% on the QB.
Appreciate all the work you put into it.
Many here won't even read based on your conclusion, but they definitely should, even it goes against their preconceived notion.
Anyways, great job!
Yup good stuff. That's right where I put Jimmy myself. Around the Cousins, Ryan, Tannehill area. Good QB's but every one of them have flaws.
If he's in that category, then he is more than just a good QB.
He is in the category of the QB that will get you wins, but when critical plays are needed to be made to will a win, he may do so on occasion, but won't more often than not.
This is why Lynch is standing strong on his value. QBs in this tier are not easy to come by, especially if you factor in his leadership.
[ Edited by Joecool on May 9, 2022 at 9:31 AM ]