Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
So you're literally just proving exactly what I said. Calling Lynch a liar.

Thanks... I guess?

I mean he did say Bucker was gonna be here for a long time, no?

Lynch said they were trying to move Jimmy, so no he's not lying overall. Can you say something to increase the likelihood someone gets moved? Sure.

I think they meant that at the time then 6 months later they realized he was too expensive. Unlike you, I don't think they were lying, I genuinely think they wanted to keep Buck as they've said multiple times yet salary didn't work like it will with Jimmy.

Key word is they WANTED to keep Buckner for a long time. They realized they COULDN'T keep Buckner. Why? Because it was a business decision and not an emotional decision. It is not a good business decision to pay a backup $26 million dollars.

Jimmy isn't going to accept a pay cut. The best decision would be to trade or cut him as soon as he is healthy. It wouldn't be in Jimmy's best interest to prolong this anymore than he has to. It would be best for him and the organization to cut ties before August. We would have the much needed cap space to improve this team and Jimmy would have enough time to push for a starting job somewhere else.

26 million dollars is worth it to Jimmy. As far as salary that money is going towards future contracts in Deebo and Bosa. Those two alone may cost 55+ mill so it's not like we can go out and just needlessly spend. It's not like that money just randomly is free'd up because Jimmy is gone. That money is tied up.

Did I say needlessly spend? I said we would have the much needed cap space to improve the team. I never said how they would spend it.

Also, Jimmy sees himself as a starter. He is a competitor. No way he wants to sit on the bench, even if he is making $26 million to do so.

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
So you're literally just proving exactly what I said. Calling Lynch a liar.

Thanks... I guess?

I mean he did say Bucker was gonna be here for a long time, no?

Lynch said they were trying to move Jimmy, so no he's not lying overall. Can you say something to increase the likelihood someone gets moved? Sure.

I think they meant that at the time then 6 months later they realized he was too expensive. Unlike you, I don't think they were lying, I genuinely think they wanted to keep Buck as they've said multiple times yet salary didn't work like it will with Jimmy.

Key word is they WANTED to keep Buckner for a long time. They realized they COULDN'T keep Buckner. Why? Because it was a business decision and not an emotional decision. It is not a good business decision to pay a backup $26 million dollars.

Jimmy isn't going to accept a pay cut. The best decision would be to trade or cut him as soon as he is healthy. It wouldn't be in Jimmy's best interest to prolong this anymore than he has to. It would be best for him and the organization to cut ties before August. We would have the much needed cap space to improve this team and Jimmy would have enough time to push for a starting job somewhere else.

26 million dollars is worth it to Jimmy. As far as salary that money is going towards future contracts in Deebo and Bosa. Those two alone may cost 55+ mill so it's not like we can go out and just needlessly spend. It's not like that money just randomly is free'd up because Jimmy is gone. That money is tied up.

Did I say needlessly spend? I said we would have the much needed cap space to improve the team. I never said how they would spend it.

Also, Jimmy sees himself as a starter. He is a competitor. No way he wants to sit on the bench, even if he is making $26 million to do so.

How exactly? If we sign players to contracts this year, that money will affect the salary cap next year when we need it to sign Bosa and Deebo. We may have a little wiggle room with an improved salary cap but not much. Hell we're right on the cusp and that's with 25 million for Jimmy. That takes care of Deebo now add another 30 possibly mill for Bosa.

Originally posted by JoseCortez:

Originally posted by joanieb:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Do we let JG have the Bears game since he has ownage?

If they were smart, which they aren't, they would let JG start. I just rewatched this game ... Jimmy rushed for 2 tds, the Bears have never beaten him and it's his hometown. Lance could beat the Bears, but it's not as sure a thing. Fields had a nice game against the 49ers, and next year he'll be better.

I find it very difficult to believe what I keep hearing, the 49ers are going to trust the season to Trey Lance. That's very risky, rookies start for bad teams ... not good ones like the 49ers. I don't think that Lance will win the close games, I don't think he'll make it to the post season, but at least you won't have Jimmy Garoppolo to kick around anymore.

You are not allowed to have this opinion in here. How dare you.

LOL... did someone just posted MORE negative things about KS10?

OR did someone just tried confirming that The Best Mind In Football wont have anyone else to point to once Grappy's gone... wait wait.. the rest of team still under the HC..

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
I don't buy it because it's not rocket science. If you and I can figure it out a professional GM can as well.

I don't think it's an indictment on Lance, I think it's BPA. Keeping Jimmy is a safety net incase Trey a 22 year old isnt ready or gets injured after a single game again. They have paraphrased this. I agree having a "quality QB" is not a bad thing. Again just like the FO has said.

Jimmy is playing the game just like they do. A dangerous precedent? It's called a contract obligation.

And I won't be surprised if they keep Jimmy. I won't be surprised if that trade him. Again they have been pretty blatant, like extremely common sense blatant about their intentions. Get something out of Jimmy or keep him. As I've said, if Trey goes down we are still contenders with Jimmy. I know that bugs the BOTB fans that would rather lose with Sudfield than win with Jimmy but it's true. Or if another QB goes down, a healthy Jimmy would be perfect for trade. There's no rush.

quit being stupid about it acting like people are making up s**t. If

"Do you see a scenario where Jimmy is in the the team next season"

Lynch: "absolutely"

You're literally... lit...er...a..lly... Calling Lynch a liar. In doing so... It's you... Who is making s**t up. You're literally..lit...er...a..lly creating a conspiracy despite DIRECT QUOTES based off emotion.

That is very obtuse and naive on your part to think that. Do you know what a scenario is or have any capability of seeing passed the present?

When jimmy is healthy, he's gone. Owing him 7.5 million is the only reason he's temporarily here

So you're literally just proving exactly what I said. Calling Lynch a liar.

Thanks... I guess?

You're proving you don't know what a scenario is

like I said earlier when Jimmy is gone, are you going to call him a liar.. you said no. But Everyone else is calling John a liar when it's just one of many scenarios. We'll I doesn't work that way.

when you figure out what scenario means, then you will realize you have nothing to stand on regarding this Starter subject

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by JoseCortez:

Originally posted by joanieb:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Do we let JG have the Bears game since he has ownage?

If they were smart, which they aren't, they would let JG start. I just rewatched this game ... Jimmy rushed for 2 tds, the Bears have never beaten him and it's his hometown. Lance could beat the Bears, but it's not as sure a thing. Fields had a nice game against the 49ers, and next year he'll be better.

I find it very difficult to believe what I keep hearing, the 49ers are going to trust the season to Trey Lance. That's very risky, rookies start for bad teams ... not good ones like the 49ers. I don't think that Lance will win the close games, I don't think he'll make it to the post season, but at least you won't have Jimmy Garoppolo to kick around anymore.

You are not allowed to have this opinion in here. How dare you.

LOL... did someone just posted MORE negative things about KS10?

OR did someone just tried confirming that The Best Mind In Football wont have anyone else to point to once Grappy's gone... wait wait.. the rest of team still under the HC..

Lol, I'm just glad you and a selected are incorrect all the time. I feel better about the season now

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
I don't buy it because it's not rocket science. If you and I can figure it out a professional GM can as well.

I don't think it's an indictment on Lance, I think it's BPA. Keeping Jimmy is a safety net incase Trey a 22 year old isnt ready or gets injured after a single game again. They have paraphrased this. I agree having a "quality QB" is not a bad thing. Again just like the FO has said.

Jimmy is playing the game just like they do. A dangerous precedent? It's called a contract obligation.

And I won't be surprised if they keep Jimmy. I won't be surprised if that trade him. Again they have been pretty blatant, like extremely common sense blatant about their intentions. Get something out of Jimmy or keep him. As I've said, if Trey goes down we are still contenders with Jimmy. I know that bugs the BOTB fans that would rather lose with Sudfield than win with Jimmy but it's true. Or if another QB goes down, a healthy Jimmy would be perfect for trade. There's no rush.

quit being stupid about it acting like people are making up s**t. If

"Do you see a scenario where Jimmy is in the the team next season"

Lynch: "absolutely"

You're literally... lit...er...a..lly... Calling Lynch a liar. In doing so... It's you... Who is making s**t up. You're literally..lit...er...a..lly creating a conspiracy despite DIRECT QUOTES based off emotion.

That is very obtuse and naive on your part to think that. Do you know what a scenario is or have any capability of seeing passed the present?

When jimmy is healthy, he's gone. Owing him 7.5 million is the only reason he's temporarily here

So you're literally just proving exactly what I said. Calling Lynch a liar.

Thanks... I guess?

You're proving you don't know what a scenario is

like I said earlier when Jimmy is gone, are you going to call him a liar.. you said no. But Everyone else is calling John a liar when it's just one of many scenarios. We'll I doesn't work that way.

when you figure out what scenario means, then you will realize you have nothing to stand on regarding this Starter subject

What would he be lying about? The only thing I would say he's lying about is if he releases Jimmy. Besides that he's saying exactly what's going on. They are looking to trade Jimmy but if not they will keep him. His words, not mine. He has said it, York has said it, Shanny has said it. It's clear cut and dry.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
So you're literally just proving exactly what I said. Calling Lynch a liar.

Thanks... I guess?

I mean he did say Bucker was gonna be here for a long time, no?

Lynch said they were trying to move Jimmy, so no he's not lying overall. Can you say something to increase the likelihood someone gets moved? Sure.

I think they meant that at the time then 6 months later they realized he was too expensive. Unlike you, I don't think they were lying, I genuinely think they wanted to keep Buck as they've said multiple times yet salary didn't work like it will with Jimmy.

Key word is they WANTED to keep Buckner for a long time. They realized they COULDN'T keep Buckner. Why? Because it was a business decision and not an emotional decision. It is not a good business decision to pay a backup $26 million dollars.

Jimmy isn't going to accept a pay cut. The best decision would be to trade or cut him as soon as he is healthy. It wouldn't be in Jimmy's best interest to prolong this anymore than he has to. It would be best for him and the organization to cut ties before August. We would have the much needed cap space to improve this team and Jimmy would have enough time to push for a starting job somewhere else.

26 million dollars is worth it to Jimmy. As far as salary that money is going towards future contracts in Deebo and Bosa. Those two alone may cost 55+ mill so it's not like we can go out and just needlessly spend. It's not like that money just randomly is free'd up because Jimmy is gone. That money is tied up.

Did I say needlessly spend? I said we would have the much needed cap space to improve the team. I never said how they would spend it.

Also, Jimmy sees himself as a starter. He is a competitor. No way he wants to sit on the bench, even if he is making $26 million to do so.

How exactly? If we sign players to contracts this year, that money will affect the salary cap next year when we need it to sign Bosa and Deebo. We may have a little wiggle room with an improved salary cap but not much. Hell we're right on the cusp and that's with 25 million for Jimmy. That takes care of Deebo now add another 30 possibly mill for Bosa.

Exactly. That cap does not roll over if Jimmy stays on this team all season. Now tell me why would it be a wise business decision to pay him to sit on the bench all season?

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by JoseCortez:

Originally posted by joanieb:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Do we let JG have the Bears game since he has ownage?

If they were smart, which they aren't, they would let JG start. I just rewatched this game ... Jimmy rushed for 2 tds, the Bears have never beaten him and it's his hometown. Lance could beat the Bears, but it's not as sure a thing. Fields had a nice game against the 49ers, and next year he'll be better.

I find it very difficult to believe what I keep hearing, the 49ers are going to trust the season to Trey Lance. That's very risky, rookies start for bad teams ... not good ones like the 49ers. I don't think that Lance will win the close games, I don't think he'll make it to the post season, but at least you won't have Jimmy Garoppolo to kick around anymore.

You are not allowed to have this opinion in here. How dare you.

LOL... did someone just posted MORE negative things about KS10?

OR did someone just tried confirming that The Best Mind In Football wont have anyone else to point to once Grappy's gone... wait wait.. the rest of team still under the HC..

Lol, I'm just glad you and a selected are incorrect all the time. I feel better about the season now

Yeah, WE can't help but keep HOPING that KS10 will finally prove us wrong..

Would you like to make a bet for a ONE YEAR SELF SUSPENSION of how the season is gonna turn out to be?

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
I don't buy it because it's not rocket science. If you and I can figure it out a professional GM can as well.

I don't think it's an indictment on Lance, I think it's BPA. Keeping Jimmy is a safety net incase Trey a 22 year old isnt ready or gets injured after a single game again. They have paraphrased this. I agree having a "quality QB" is not a bad thing. Again just like the FO has said.

Jimmy is playing the game just like they do. A dangerous precedent? It's called a contract obligation.

And I won't be surprised if they keep Jimmy. I won't be surprised if that trade him. Again they have been pretty blatant, like extremely common sense blatant about their intentions. Get something out of Jimmy or keep him. As I've said, if Trey goes down we are still contenders with Jimmy. I know that bugs the BOTB fans that would rather lose with Sudfield than win with Jimmy but it's true. Or if another QB goes down, a healthy Jimmy would be perfect for trade. There's no rush.

quit being stupid about it acting like people are making up s**t. If

"Do you see a scenario where Jimmy is in the the team next season"

Lynch: "absolutely"

You're literally... lit...er...a..lly... Calling Lynch a liar. In doing so... It's you... Who is making s**t up. You're literally..lit...er...a..lly creating a conspiracy despite DIRECT QUOTES based off emotion.

That is very obtuse and naive on your part to think that. Do you know what a scenario is or have any capability of seeing passed the present?

When jimmy is healthy, he's gone. Owing him 7.5 million is the only reason he's temporarily here

So you're literally just proving exactly what I said. Calling Lynch a liar.

Thanks... I guess?

You're proving you don't know what a scenario is

like I said earlier when Jimmy is gone, are you going to call him a liar.. you said no. But Everyone else is calling John a liar when it's just one of many scenarios. We'll I doesn't work that way.

when you figure out what scenario means, then you will realize you have nothing to stand on regarding this Starter subject

What would he be lying about? The only thing I would say he's lying about is if he releases Jimmy. Besides that he's saying exactly what's going on. They are looking to trade Jimmy but if not they will keep him. His words, not mine. He has said it, York has said it, Shanny has said it. It's clear cut and dry.

It could be that he just anticipates a trade before week 1 or before the trade deadline.

In terms of running a team's SALARY CAP, the correct answer is to try to trade him but cut him before week 1. But on the other hand, doing so would thoroughly screw over Jimmy, which absolutely will not sit well with the rest of the team.

Which means the best move is to get him off the roster BEFORE training camp, and if you can't do that, keep him on the team at a more reasonable salary. And if he refuses, and you still can't trade him, only then do you cut him—but definitely NOT just before week one, because that would be a bad investment in terms of future contracts and free agent signings.

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
So you're literally just proving exactly what I said. Calling Lynch a liar.

Thanks... I guess?

I mean he did say Bucker was gonna be here for a long time, no?

Lynch said they were trying to move Jimmy, so no he's not lying overall. Can you say something to increase the likelihood someone gets moved? Sure.

I think they meant that at the time then 6 months later they realized he was too expensive. Unlike you, I don't think they were lying, I genuinely think they wanted to keep Buck as they've said multiple times yet salary didn't work like it will with Jimmy.

Key word is they WANTED to keep Buckner for a long time. They realized they COULDN'T keep Buckner. Why? Because it was a business decision and not an emotional decision. It is not a good business decision to pay a backup $26 million dollars.

Jimmy isn't going to accept a pay cut. The best decision would be to trade or cut him as soon as he is healthy. It wouldn't be in Jimmy's best interest to prolong this anymore than he has to. It would be best for him and the organization to cut ties before August. We would have the much needed cap space to improve this team and Jimmy would have enough time to push for a starting job somewhere else.

26 million dollars is worth it to Jimmy. As far as salary that money is going towards future contracts in Deebo and Bosa. Those two alone may cost 55+ mill so it's not like we can go out and just needlessly spend. It's not like that money just randomly is free'd up because Jimmy is gone. That money is tied up.

Did I say needlessly spend? I said we would have the much needed cap space to improve the team. I never said how they would spend it.

Also, Jimmy sees himself as a starter. He is a competitor. No way he wants to sit on the bench, even if he is making $26 million to do so.

How exactly? If we sign players to contracts this year, that money will affect the salary cap next year when we need it to sign Bosa and Deebo. We may have a little wiggle room with an improved salary cap but not much. Hell we're right on the cusp and that's with 25 million for Jimmy. That takes care of Deebo now add another 30 possibly mill for Bosa.

Exactly. That cap does not roll over if Jimmy stays on this team all season. Now tell me why would it be a wise business decision to pay him to sit on the bench all season?

I heard the cap may rise as much as 20% next year. That would put it near $250 million. The problem is salaries are rising even more. WR making QB money. QBs making CEO money.

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
So you're literally just proving exactly what I said. Calling Lynch a liar.

Thanks... I guess?

I mean he did say Bucker was gonna be here for a long time, no?

Lynch said they were trying to move Jimmy, so no he's not lying overall. Can you say something to increase the likelihood someone gets moved? Sure.

I think they meant that at the time then 6 months later they realized he was too expensive. Unlike you, I don't think they were lying, I genuinely think they wanted to keep Buck as they've said multiple times yet salary didn't work like it will with Jimmy.

Key word is they WANTED to keep Buckner for a long time. They realized they COULDN'T keep Buckner. Why? Because it was a business decision and not an emotional decision. It is not a good business decision to pay a backup $26 million dollars.

Jimmy isn't going to accept a pay cut. The best decision would be to trade or cut him as soon as he is healthy. It wouldn't be in Jimmy's best interest to prolong this anymore than he has to. It would be best for him and the organization to cut ties before August. We would have the much needed cap space to improve this team and Jimmy would have enough time to push for a starting job somewhere else.

26 million dollars is worth it to Jimmy. As far as salary that money is going towards future contracts in Deebo and Bosa. Those two alone may cost 55+ mill so it's not like we can go out and just needlessly spend. It's not like that money just randomly is free'd up because Jimmy is gone. That money is tied up.

Did I say needlessly spend? I said we would have the much needed cap space to improve the team. I never said how they would spend it.

Also, Jimmy sees himself as a starter. He is a competitor. No way he wants to sit on the bench, even if he is making $26 million to do so.

How exactly? If we sign players to contracts this year, that money will affect the salary cap next year when we need it to sign Bosa and Deebo. We may have a little wiggle room with an improved salary cap but not much. Hell we're right on the cusp and that's with 25 million for Jimmy. That takes care of Deebo now add another 30 possibly mill for Bosa.

Exactly. That cap does not roll over if Jimmy stays on this team all season. Now tell me why would it be a wise business decision to pay him to sit on the bench all season?

Because we are a championship caliber team and that window will not always be open. Trey is only 22 so what happens if he struggles? What happens if he gets injured? There are 52 other players and coaches that's job is to win games.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
So you're literally just proving exactly what I said. Calling Lynch a liar.

Thanks... I guess?

I mean he did say Bucker was gonna be here for a long time, no?

Lynch said they were trying to move Jimmy, so no he's not lying overall. Can you say something to increase the likelihood someone gets moved? Sure.

I think they meant that at the time then 6 months later they realized he was too expensive. Unlike you, I don't think they were lying, I genuinely think they wanted to keep Buck as they've said multiple times yet salary didn't work like it will with Jimmy.

Key word is they WANTED to keep Buckner for a long time. They realized they COULDN'T keep Buckner. Why? Because it was a business decision and not an emotional decision. It is not a good business decision to pay a backup $26 million dollars.

Jimmy isn't going to accept a pay cut. The best decision would be to trade or cut him as soon as he is healthy. It wouldn't be in Jimmy's best interest to prolong this anymore than he has to. It would be best for him and the organization to cut ties before August. We would have the much needed cap space to improve this team and Jimmy would have enough time to push for a starting job somewhere else.

26 million dollars is worth it to Jimmy. As far as salary that money is going towards future contracts in Deebo and Bosa. Those two alone may cost 55+ mill so it's not like we can go out and just needlessly spend. It's not like that money just randomly is free'd up because Jimmy is gone. That money is tied up.

Did I say needlessly spend? I said we would have the much needed cap space to improve the team. I never said how they would spend it.

Also, Jimmy sees himself as a starter. He is a competitor. No way he wants to sit on the bench, even if he is making $26 million to do so.

How exactly? If we sign players to contracts this year, that money will affect the salary cap next year when we need it to sign Bosa and Deebo. We may have a little wiggle room with an improved salary cap but not much. Hell we're right on the cusp and that's with 25 million for Jimmy. That takes care of Deebo now add another 30 possibly mill for Bosa.

Exactly. That cap does not roll over if Jimmy stays on this team all season. Now tell me why would it be a wise business decision to pay him to sit on the bench all season?

Because we are a championship caliber team and that window will not always be open. Trey is only 22 so what happens if he struggles? What happens if he gets injured? There are 52 other players and coaches that's job is to win games.

it's almost certain that Baby Face Lance will struggle, the guy is young and did not play a lot in college..

This is the reason why I really felt that we shoulda gone DEFENSE in the draft.. provide him with a very strong D that would at least keep the game close as he learns..

I'd hate to see this guy, since he is the FUTURE, to go thru a season w/o getting any help from our D..

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
So you're literally just proving exactly what I said. Calling Lynch a liar.

Thanks... I guess?

I mean he did say Bucker was gonna be here for a long time, no?

Lynch said they were trying to move Jimmy, so no he's not lying overall. Can you say something to increase the likelihood someone gets moved? Sure.

I think they meant that at the time then 6 months later they realized he was too expensive. Unlike you, I don't think they were lying, I genuinely think they wanted to keep Buck as they've said multiple times yet salary didn't work like it will with Jimmy.

Key word is they WANTED to keep Buckner for a long time. They realized they COULDN'T keep Buckner. Why? Because it was a business decision and not an emotional decision. It is not a good business decision to pay a backup $26 million dollars.

Jimmy isn't going to accept a pay cut. The best decision would be to trade or cut him as soon as he is healthy. It wouldn't be in Jimmy's best interest to prolong this anymore than he has to. It would be best for him and the organization to cut ties before August. We would have the much needed cap space to improve this team and Jimmy would have enough time to push for a starting job somewhere else.

26 million dollars is worth it to Jimmy. As far as salary that money is going towards future contracts in Deebo and Bosa. Those two alone may cost 55+ mill so it's not like we can go out and just needlessly spend. It's not like that money just randomly is free'd up because Jimmy is gone. That money is tied up.

Did I say needlessly spend? I said we would have the much needed cap space to improve the team. I never said how they would spend it.

Also, Jimmy sees himself as a starter. He is a competitor. No way he wants to sit on the bench, even if he is making $26 million to do so.

How exactly? If we sign players to contracts this year, that money will affect the salary cap next year when we need it to sign Bosa and Deebo. We may have a little wiggle room with an improved salary cap but not much. Hell we're right on the cusp and that's with 25 million for Jimmy. That takes care of Deebo now add another 30 possibly mill for Bosa.

Exactly. That cap does not roll over if Jimmy stays on this team all season. Now tell me why would it be a wise business decision to pay him to sit on the bench all season?

Because we are a championship caliber team and that window will not always be open. Trey is only 22 so what happens if he struggles? What happens if he gets injured? There are 52 other players and coaches that's job is to win games.

"We may have a little wiggle room with an improved salary cap but not much."

This is your quote. Not much wiggle room even with an improved salary cap. Not a wise business decision to keep a back up at $26 million when you don't have any wiggle room this off season and very little next off season.

The best way to keep this team a championship caliber team is to make sure we keep improving the talent around our future, which is Trey. Mack is most likely gone after next season and who knows how many more seasons Williams has left in him. The right side of the line is a big question mark at this moment. We still have Deebo and Bosa to extend. That is just the salary cap side of things. We could go over the implications it would have on the locker room as well. There are plenty of reasons not to keep Jimmy but you want to obsess over the one reason why we should.

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by JoseCortez:

Originally posted by joanieb:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Do we let JG have the Bears game since he has ownage?

If they were smart, which they aren't, they would let JG start. I just rewatched this game ... Jimmy rushed for 2 tds, the Bears have never beaten him and it's his hometown. Lance could beat the Bears, but it's not as sure a thing. Fields had a nice game against the 49ers, and next year he'll be better.

I find it very difficult to believe what I keep hearing, the 49ers are going to trust the season to Trey Lance. That's very risky, rookies start for bad teams ... not good ones like the 49ers. I don't think that Lance will win the close games, I don't think he'll make it to the post season, but at least you won't have Jimmy Garoppolo to kick around anymore.

You are not allowed to have this opinion in here. How dare you.

LOL... did someone just posted MORE negative things about KS10?

OR did someone just tried confirming that The Best Mind In Football wont have anyone else to point to once Grappy's gone... wait wait.. the rest of team still under the HC..

At some point, we need to see what Lance can do. If we fail to reach the playoffs this season with Lance at the helm, it's fair to say Kyle and Lynch messed up big time.

Originally posted by Sickaa:

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by JoseCortez:

Originally posted by joanieb:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Do we let JG have the Bears game since he has ownage?

If they were smart, which they aren't, they would let JG start. I just rewatched this game ... Jimmy rushed for 2 tds, the Bears have never beaten him and it's his hometown. Lance could beat the Bears, but it's not as sure a thing. Fields had a nice game against the 49ers, and next year he'll be better.

I find it very difficult to believe what I keep hearing, the 49ers are going to trust the season to Trey Lance. That's very risky, rookies start for bad teams ... not good ones like the 49ers. I don't think that Lance will win the close games, I don't think he'll make it to the post season, but at least you won't have Jimmy Garoppolo to kick around anymore.

You are not allowed to have this opinion in here. How dare you.

LOL... did someone just posted MORE negative things about KS10?

OR did someone just tried confirming that The Best Mind In Football wont have anyone else to point to once Grappy's gone... wait wait.. the rest of team still under the HC..

At some point, we need to see what Lance can do. If we fail to reach the playoffs this season with Lance at the helm, it's fair to say Kyle and Lynch messed up big time.

What part of Trey's performance last season has folks feeling like the glass is half empty? Sure. He missed some reads. Jimmy missed plenty of them last season as well. Trey also showed he can make up for his inexperience by making ad-lib plays. Something Jimmy rarely does. Trey can only become more experienced by playing through and learning from his mistakes. Imo, he has shown enough good that he should be given the opportunity to learn on the job. It also helps having Shanahan as your play caller but maybe thats just me.