Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Going from Wilson to Jimmy would be an upgrade for the Jets.

Originally posted by Brucey72:
We will take Tomlinson back

I'd absolutely be on board with that!

Originally posted by Oregon49erfan:
Except the Jets currently have under 9 mil in cap space...

Their raw QB just tore an ACL

He needs rehab and development

JG can spend 2 years there easy

Flacco starts until JG learns the offense then goes back to 2nd string

Originally posted by picklejuice:
why would the jets want jimmy g when they already have a winner with flacco.

because this ain't 2012-2013 Fracco he's got miles on him

Sudfeld > Garoppolo.

Originally posted by BOI49er:
Sudfeld > Garoppolo.

Oddly enough sudfeld may have played well enough that Kyle felt fine having him as the backup making it even easier to move on from JG etc.

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Going from Wilson to Jimmy would be an upgrade for the Jets.

it really would

Originally posted by BOI49er:
Sudfeld > Garoppolo.

sudfeld is the goat

"Just cut Jimmy, QBs never gets hurt"

Watson was 1/7 in CLE too

Jets and Browns start bidding

.

They got any porn stars in NY?

flacco is a real qb, he can throw the deep ball unlike jimmy g.

Originally posted by TheGore49er:
Problem is there aren't enough variables in your equation. And I don't even know how you would go by it without spending a ridiculous amount of time doing the math.

Like you said, some INTs are basically a long punt, so there's no harm there. Then you have QBs that throw INTs more often than others, but they are so great at making up for it, that it's not a big deal. Especially if it's a great offense.

And if you have a great defense, INTs are also not a big deal.

Too many variables that go into it. Overall, it's better to not throw INTs though.

The math wouldn't be the place where the time is spent. The time would be spent parsing the data into categories, and finding the data for contextual interceptions. The math part is no more than I've already done: compile the data and calculate the correlation coefficient with win%.

And the main reason INTs don't matter as much is because they are infrequent. Even the worst INT season since 1988 didn't even amount to 2 INTs per game (referring to Winston's 30 INTs, of course)!

An interception may have a big impact relative to its frequency, but the combined weight of failed third down conversions and sacks in a game is usually more important.

Of the teams which punted the least, ALL BUT ONE made the playoffs. (the Chargers, who were an OT game away)

In 2020, 7 of the ten teams which punted least made the playoffs.

In 2019, 6 of the ten teams which punted least made the playoffs.

In 2018, 7 of the ten teams which punted least made the playoffs.

Now, by contrast, the ten teams with the worst INT%, four of the best ten in INT% didn't make the playoffs (Vikings, Seahawks, Colts, Broncos).

Four in 2020.

Three in 2019.

Three in 2019.

So, the percentage of teams over the last four years which make the playoffs in the top ten of

Fewest punts: 72.5%

Lowest INT% 65.0%