There are 267 users in the forums
Originally posted by Ensatsu:
"They are NOT going to trade for Jimmy Garoppolo."@jjones9 breaks down what's next for the Browns at QB after Deshaun Watson was handed an 11-game suspension. pic.twitter.com/mAdgI3f1Ac
— CBS Sports HQ (@CBSSportsHQ) August 18, 2022
Lynch lost the poker game. Just cut him tomorrow. What's the point?
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by scooterp10:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by scooterp10:
I heard that if they trade Jimmy in the season they can carry over part of that money to next year or something like that. Is that true?
Yes, that total salary is pro rated over the 17 games so whenever they decide to cut/trade him, they are paying on a game-by-game basis. Albeit, expensive game-by-game basis. The rest will carry over to the cap for next year.
So it makes more sense to keep him and tell a team like the Browns give in and make a trade. They get a pic and extra cap space next year. If that's correct
It does not.
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by Ensatsu:
"They are NOT going to trade for Jimmy Garoppolo."@jjones9 breaks down what's next for the Browns at QB after Deshaun Watson was handed an 11-game suspension. pic.twitter.com/mAdgI3f1Ac
— CBS Sports HQ (@CBSSportsHQ) August 18, 2022
Lynch lost the poker game. Just cut him tomorrow. What's the point?
The point is to not do Jimmy nor Seattle any favors.
Originally posted by Ninerlakerdodger:
Might be worth keeping Jimmy if Staffords got a bum elbow…… With Seattle and possibly the Rams as landing spots we might just be better off holding onto him for a few games.
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by scooterp10:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by scooterp10:
I heard that if they trade Jimmy in the season they can carry over part of that money to next year or something like that. Is that true?
Yes, that total salary is pro rated over the 17 games so whenever they decide to cut/trade him, they are paying on a game-by-game basis. Albeit, expensive game-by-game basis. The rest will carry over to the cap for next year.
So it makes more sense to keep him and tell a team like the Browns give in and make a trade. They get a pic and extra cap space next year. If that's correct
It does not.
my god,,,, it makes no sense. zero to keep him., my god.. we over valued jimmy and played chicken with the nfl after the year and no one bit... shouldersurgeryexcuses not withstanding
Originally posted by RiceOwensStokes:
So the 49ers were upset with Jimmy's lack of communication with the team, yet still decided to stick with him after 2019 when Brady was begging to be a Niner?
wut?!
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:as you just found out that hell has indeed frozen over
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by scooterp10:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by scooterp10:
I heard that if they trade Jimmy in the season they can carry over part of that money to next year or something like that. Is that true?
Yes, that total salary is pro rated over the 17 games so whenever they decide to cut/trade him, they are paying on a game-by-game basis. Albeit, expensive game-by-game basis. The rest will carry over to the cap for next year.
So it makes more sense to keep him and tell a team like the Browns give in and make a trade. They get a pic and extra cap space next year. If that's correct
It does not.
my god,,,, it makes no sense. zero to keep him., my god.. we over valued jimmy and played chicken with the nfl after the year and no one bit... shouldersurgeryexcuses not withstanding
That moment when you realize cc has been right all along --->
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by scooterp10:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by scooterp10:
I heard that if they trade Jimmy in the season they can carry over part of that money to next year or something like that. Is that true?
Yes, that total salary is pro rated over the 17 games so whenever they decide to cut/trade him, they are paying on a game-by-game basis. Albeit, expensive game-by-game basis. The rest will carry over to the cap for next year.
So it makes more sense to keep him and tell a team like the Browns give in and make a trade. They get a pic and extra cap space next year. If that's correct
It does not.
my god,,,, it makes no sense. zero to keep him., my god.. we over valued jimmy and played chicken with the nfl after the year and no one bit... shouldersurgeryexcuses not withstanding
That moment when you realize cc has been right all along --->
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by Ensatsu:
"They are NOT going to trade for Jimmy Garoppolo."@jjones9 breaks down what's next for the Browns at QB after Deshaun Watson was handed an 11-game suspension. pic.twitter.com/mAdgI3f1Ac
— CBS Sports HQ (@CBSSportsHQ) August 18, 2022
Lynch lost the poker game. Just cut him tomorrow. What's the point?
The point is to not do Jimmy nor Seattle any favors.
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:as you just found out that hell has indeed frozen over
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by scooterp10:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by scooterp10:
I heard that if they trade Jimmy in the season they can carry over part of that money to next year or something like that. Is that true?
Yes, that total salary is pro rated over the 17 games so whenever they decide to cut/trade him, they are paying on a game-by-game basis. Albeit, expensive game-by-game basis. The rest will carry over to the cap for next year.
So it makes more sense to keep him and tell a team like the Browns give in and make a trade. They get a pic and extra cap space next year. If that's correct
It does not.
my god,,,, it makes no sense. zero to keep him., my god.. we over valued jimmy and played chicken with the nfl after the year and no one bit... shouldersurgeryexcuses not withstanding
That moment when you realize cc has been right all along --->
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by scooterp10:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by scooterp10:
I heard that if they trade Jimmy in the season they can carry over part of that money to next year or something like that. Is that true?
Yes, that total salary is pro rated over the 17 games so whenever they decide to cut/trade him, they are paying on a game-by-game basis. Albeit, expensive game-by-game basis. The rest will carry over to the cap for next year.
So it makes more sense to keep him and tell a team like the Browns give in and make a trade. They get a pic and extra cap space next year. If that's correct
It does not.
my god,,,, it makes no sense. zero to keep him., my god.. we over valued jimmy and played chicken with the nfl after the year and no one bit... shouldersurgeryexcuses not withstanding
That moment when you realize cc has been right all along --->
We know why Jimmy can do. I'd rather see Purdy could do if Lance ever got hurt lol
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by RiceOwensStokes:
So the 49ers were upset with Jimmy's lack of communication with the team, yet still decided to stick with him after 2019 when Brady was begging to be a Niner?
wut?!
I think that entire narrative is overblown.
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
We know why Jimmy can do. I'd rather see Purdy could do if Lance ever got hurt lol
Originally posted by Alfienator:
The real problem was the Niners trying to be in good faith with Jimmy. Should've shipped him to Washington when they had the chance.