Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by boast:
+ Show all quotes
because that comment wasnt well thought out or logical. it's an apples and oranges comparison. there's a huge difference between a division rival signing a back up TE or 3rd CB and signing a starting QB who's been in the system for five years. the QB brings far more knowledge of the scheme and philosophy behind it to the rival than a positional player.
and you dont see a starting caliber QB being made available to a division rival often at all.
The starting caliber is irrelevant to the point. Because this is about scheme and bringing knowledge of his former team to the new team. I agree with you, that QBs have far more knowledge about scheme and philosophy than position players. So why arent teams desperately trying to pluck their rivals backup QBs then?
"starting caliber" is very relevant in the case of JG. see Sando's 2022 list of opinions from NFL HCs and execs. Jimmy ranks 16th.
Its relevant in general. It has nothing to do with signing a division rivals QB, which is all I was responding about. So in terms of this specific line of speaking, its completely irrelevant. To your point (which wasnt what I was talking about), its relevant.