Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by RiceOwensStokes:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by RiceOwensStokes:
This team could've been in the super bowl with Blaine Gabbert according to this forum….

god

Imagine actually believing people think this. SMFH.

"Jimmy only had 3 good games, none last year"

So….

Bears, Falcons, Rams 2x including GW drive which punched our postseason ticket, Bengals, those were all good games last year just off the top of the ol dome here

Falcons is probably the only game you can argue on. Others not so much.

bears, Deebo saved us
rams, deebo and defense saved us
bengals, we were fortunate to get two cinci ST fumbles to help us start scoring or it would have been a different story and don't forget the dropped jimmy pick 6 at the end

like I said one or two passes a game in 2021 doesn't make an entire game played well.

now I would go to bat for jimmy 2019 a lot more than Jimmy 2021

You are legit doubling down on this take? Sweet lord man.

Originally posted by NinerBuff:

Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
So it's NFCC or bust for Trey. Extremely stupid but if Jimmy did nothing then the sane should be expected for Trey.

Que the double standards

He could miss the playoff but show promise and we'd be looking good going into 2023 (Herbert missed playoffs). We could make it to the NFCCG and Lance could really struggle and we'd be nervous going into the offseason. After all, Jets fans could see the writing on the wall with Sanchez, even though he made two playoff runs.

I grade Jimmy as the 15-20 best QB, if Lance can match that, we should be a fringe playoff team (last last year). If he's 10-15, then we have a real shot at the SB. If he's top-10, we could have a dynasty. And if he's not a top-20 QB, then I don't expect us to make the playoffs and we could be looking "nervous" about 2023 and beyond.

Looking for steady growth.

Agree and good post though id put him 12-15 but JimmyATT is literally saying Jimmy didn't do anything and was carried so unless he's a hypocrite we should expect the same if not more from Trey. If Trey can't even do what worthless Jimmy who didn't do anything did, then he's an obvious bust. Flat out garbage. JimmyATT's stupid argument, not mine.

I think this team outside of OL is far more stacked than last year so unless Trey is so terrible that he can't even be carried then we should expect the same results.

Me, I understand that QB is the most important position in all of sports and that Jimmy did a lot more than some give him credit for. It's not Madden and it's not as easy as these guys think. I also can agree Jimmy is far from perfect.

Originally posted by NinerBuff:
He could miss the playoff but show promise and we'd be looking good going into 2023 (Herbert missed playoffs). We could make it to the NFCCG and Lance could really struggle and we'd be nervous going into the offseason. After all, Jets fans could see the writing on the wall with Sanchez, even though he made two playoff runs.

I grade Jimmy as the 15-20 best QB, if Lance can match that, we should be a fringe playoff team (last last year). If he's 10-15, then we have a real shot at the SB. If he's top-10, we could have a dynasty. And if he's not a top-20 QB, then I don't expect us to make the playoffs and we could be looking "nervous" about 2023 and beyond.

Looking for steady growth.

First paragraph is spot on. We need to differentiate between QB performance and team performance.

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by NinerBuff:
He could miss the playoff but show promise and we'd be looking good going into 2023 (Herbert missed playoffs). We could make it to the NFCCG and Lance could really struggle and we'd be nervous going into the offseason. After all, Jets fans could see the writing on the wall with Sanchez, even though he made two playoff runs.

I grade Jimmy as the 15-20 best QB, if Lance can match that, we should be a fringe playoff team (last last year). If he's 10-15, then we have a real shot at the SB. If he's top-10, we could have a dynasty. And if he's not a top-20 QB, then I don't expect us to make the playoffs and we could be looking "nervous" about 2023 and beyond.

Looking for steady growth.

First paragraph is spot on. We need to differentiate between QB performance and team performance.

Some of us have been trying to get posters to do that for years, but here we are.

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by NinerBuff:
He could miss the playoff but show promise and we'd be looking good going into 2023 (Herbert missed playoffs). We could make it to the NFCCG and Lance could really struggle and we'd be nervous going into the offseason. After all, Jets fans could see the writing on the wall with Sanchez, even though he made two playoff runs.

I grade Jimmy as the 15-20 best QB, if Lance can match that, we should be a fringe playoff team (last last year). If he's 10-15, then we have a real shot at the SB. If he's top-10, we could have a dynasty. And if he's not a top-20 QB, then I don't expect us to make the playoffs and we could be looking "nervous" about 2023 and beyond.

Looking for steady growth.

First paragraph is spot on. We need to differentiate between QB performance and team performance.

The team is every bit as talented though. There is only one substantial position change. Barring massive injuries the expectations should not go in reverse, especially if arguably the most important position is upgraded from doing absolutely nothing as claimed. You don't give away 3 first picks for WRs or DE's.

And it's funny how people say it's a team game yet are here blaming Jimmy for everything. The hypocrisy knows no bounds. It's a team game except when guys can blame Jimmy lol.

Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
And it's funny how people say it's a team game yet are here blaming Jimmy for everything. The hypocrisy knows no bounds. It's a team game except when guys can blame Jimmy lol.

When Jimmy played a full game for the Niners:

46 total games

34-12 (74%)

27 points per game

9 late-game drives that produced wins (or, 26% of those 34 wins)

14 = worst point-differential loss

When Jimmy played a full game for the Niners, they were extremely tough to beat.

Originally posted by LottDMontanaO:

Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
And it's funny how people say it's a team game yet are here blaming Jimmy for everything. The hypocrisy knows no bounds. It's a team game except when guys can blame Jimmy lol.

When Jimmy played a full game for the Niners:

46 total games

34-12 (74%)

27 points per game

9 late-game drives that produced wins (or, 26% of those 34 wins)

14 = worst point-differential loss

When Jimmy played a full game for the Niners, they were extremely tough to beat.

It's a testament to the strength of the rest of the roster that they were able to overcome Jimmy's limitations at QB, but no one is claiming that Jimmy didn't contribute to the success of the team in some ways. When healthy, most would agree he's a top 20 QB.

Originally posted by LottDMontanaO:

Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
And it's funny how people say it's a team game yet are here blaming Jimmy for everything. The hypocrisy knows no bounds. It's a team game except when guys can blame Jimmy lol.

When Jimmy played a full game for the Niners:

46 total games

34-12 (74%)

27 points per game

9 late-game drives that produced wins (or, 26% of those 34 wins)

14 = worst point-differential loss

When Jimmy played a full game for the Niners, they were extremely tough to beat.

Jimmy is definitely the 49er scapegoat. I wonder who's next.

Originally posted by 49ersRing:
It's a testament to the strength of the rest of the roster that they were able to overcome Jimmy's limitations at QB, but no one is claiming that Jimmy didn't contribute to the success of the team in some ways. When healthy, most would agree he's a top 20 QB.

Most people would agree that the Lance deal would not have been made if JG would have remained healthy 90% of the time.

Oft injured immobile guy with limited deep ability is a fact. But being a winner is a fact too. They simply decided to win a Super Bowl they needed to upgrade

Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
And it's funny how people say it's a team game yet are here blaming Jimmy for everything. The hypocrisy knows no bounds. It's a team game except when guys can blame Jimmy lol.

No different then y'all believing Jimmy took us to a SB and a NFCCG.

Originally posted by LottDMontanaO:
When Jimmy played a full game for the Niners:

46 total games

34-12 (74%)

27 points per game

9 late-game drives that produced wins (or, 26% of those 34 wins)

14 = worst point-differential loss

When Jimmy played a full game for the Niners, they were extremely tough to beat.

There are the facts.

Originally posted by dj43:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:
It's a testament to the strength of the rest of the roster that they were able to overcome Jimmy's limitations at QB, but no one is claiming that Jimmy didn't contribute to the success of the team in some ways. When healthy, most would agree he's a top 20 QB.

Most people would agree that the Lance deal would not have been made if JG would have remained healthy 90% of the time.

I don't know. The Rams moved on from their version of Jimmy Garoppolo and he wasn't that injury prone.

Originally posted by 5thSFG:
Jimmy is definitely the 49er scapegoat. I wonder who's next.

I wouldn't go that far.

QBs separate themselves in the playoffs.

In 6 playoff games Jimmy threw 4 TDs and 6 INTs at an average yardage of 160 yards/game.