Cardinals stun turnover-plagued 49ers 24-23 after second-half comeback →

There are 423 users in the forums

Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Shop 49ers game tickets
  • thl408
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 32,831
Originally posted by dj43:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by eastie:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
beating inferior teams is fun in all, but he doesn't win when it counts due to his limitations and constant mistakes

i really hope he can change that this year, but it's year 6 now

That's a dumb comment. He has taken this team to TWO NFC Championship games in the last three years and one Superbowl. That's the very definition of winning when it counts. Your hate for the player is clouding what you see.

The way some folks feel about Jimmy is how I feel about Kyle. Be lucky we have him even if he is flawed. Except I think Kyle can improve since he's a young coach.

+1

I will add that JG is still relatively young in terms of actual playing time. Both Kyle and Jimmy have time to improve. Some of the passes Garoppolo threw in this last game were not passes he has often attempted in previous games. (I'm thinking particularly about the 40-yard sideline throw to Aiyuk that went through his hands, and the 50/50 ball to Gray.) If Kyle will evolve and let Jimmy open up a bit more, perhaps they both reach their goal. One thing is sure, you can't keep doing the same thing over and over and expect the result to change.

True. A QB can always be quicker with his reads as he gains experience. Pocket passers can continue to get better once they pass the age of 30. And if Jimmy improved his lower body mechanics, he can improve accuracy and put more zip into the throws that require him to really drive it in there.
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by dj43:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by eastie:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
beating inferior teams is fun in all, but he doesn't win when it counts due to his limitations and constant mistakes

i really hope he can change that this year, but it's year 6 now

That's a dumb comment. He has taken this team to TWO NFC Championship games in the last three years and one Superbowl. That's the very definition of winning when it counts. Your hate for the player is clouding what you see.

The way some folks feel about Jimmy is how I feel about Kyle. Be lucky we have him even if he is flawed. Except I think Kyle can improve since he's a young coach.

+1

I will add that JG is still relatively young in terms of actual playing time. Both Kyle and Jimmy have time to improve. Some of the passes Garoppolo threw in this last game were not passes he has often attempted in previous games. (I'm thinking particularly about the 40-yard sideline throw to Aiyuk that went through his hands, and the 50/50 ball to Gray.) If Kyle will evolve and let Jimmy open up a bit more, perhaps they both reach their goal. One thing is sure, you can't keep doing the same thing over and over and expect the result to change.

True. A QB can always be quicker with his reads as he gains experience. Pocket passers can continue to get better once they pass the age of 30. And if Jimmy improved his lower body mechanics, he can improve accuracy and put more zip into the throws that require him to really drive it in there.

With another team hopefully.
  • thl408
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 32,831
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by jonnydel:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Ultimately this comes down to the delicate balance of recognizing Kyle is a control-freak within his offense, which shouldn't shock anyone, vs. trying to weed out how much control/freedom his QB (Jimmy) really has within it.

Jimmy's own quotes over the years give great insight into that. In fact, Kyle's own quotes saying Jimmy had a good game in post game interviews (when we as fans may think otherwise) gives more credence to Jimmy doing what he's instructed within the play designs.

Kyle's head is buried in his playbook and playsheet. This is who he is. He controls every aspect of the offensive personnel and how it operates. It's why we hired him!

But I have this sneaky suspicion Kyle is about to let go a tad and let Jimmy incorporate his own style and preference even more now. Less blind PA's, more receiving options out there, etc. We'll see!

Mike was the same way. Steve said he used to call him, Mike "go over it one more time" Shanahan because he would sit there and hammer in the exact way to react to each and every situation with Steve. They'd go through the play calls, this is the read vs this, this is the read vs this, this is the read vs this for 300 plays. They went through it twice the morning before the super bowl. Steve said it was like Rain man.

I don't understand how this makes a coach a control freak. Are there coaches that tell their QB, "if it's Cover2 do this and this, but if you don't want to then that's okay too".
Pass plays have adjustments and progressions and reads built into them. There are route conversions by the WRs, hot routes where if it's a blitz then adjust the play accordingly.

I'll let you guys get into the details but it sure sounds like QB's are given varying degrees of "control" within their offenses. Some spread offenses are driven by the QB, so-to-speak, while other QB's are nothing but a video game controller for their HC/OC. We've seen that from Walsh to Roman to Shanahan. To the other side, you can have two QB's coached up within the same exact play design, differently. JT O'Picks-A-Lot speaks to that all the time. Sometimes that could be because of the strengths of the QB and sometimes it's dictated by the game situation (ahead or behind, strength of that defense, etc.). I think the Shanahan's are both at one extreme.

Perhaps a coach won't allow a QB to audible out of a playcall. That's the first thing I think of when I think 'control freak'. But when it comes to individual pass plays, there has to be structure to the play design so that every player is on the same page. Progressions tell the QB where to look versus what coverage. This is the NFL, there isn't a playcall that tells the QB "do whatever you want, this play diagram with progressions are just suggestions".

I gotcha. I'm talking more about game planning input, audible out, how's he's coached up within each play, etc. Kyle's biggest thing is trust my plan. My primary will be open. I don't care if you came from another system and you're most comfortable in it. This is my world now.

So when Garoppolo speaks to being the good soldier and simply doing what's asked of him by Kyle, what do you think that's referring too from your opinion?

I guess there are several areas where a coach can be a 'control freak'. Gameplanning is one that I hadn't thought of so perhaps that's a possibility to what Jimmy is referring to.
The point of contention I have is when it comes to individual plays. A coach that wants the play executed a certain way is just being a coach. I don't see anything control freakish about that. I truly don't know what Jimmy is referring to. A QB that isn't very good at ad-libbing should not be allowed to ad-lib. Maybe Jimmy doesn't agree with Kyle when it comes to this, if this is indeed what Jimmy is talking about.
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by 49ers81:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Jimmy do work on SNF! I'll root for you as long as you are in SF. I will also be objective and know he's an avg starting NFL QB, which isn't horrible but the truth. Either way we got some pretty bad QB play across the league and guys starting that have no business being starters. Jimmy is a starter.

when Trey comes back, I will root for him to succeed and understand it's a process. You don't wake up and magically become a great pocket passing QB. It will require reps and getting through all of it. Let's be objective about all of it and understand the process. I would think there's room for 49er fans to support both.

You see, this is where you keep getting yourself in trouble. You always claim you're just being objective about something which you assert is an "obvious" truth, which is that Jimmy is an average QB. That's you're opinion and you're entitled to it but that doesn't make it true. It is a common theme in this thread and, from the opposite side posted by others in the Lance thread. People keep mistaking their opinions for some hard truth and so they feel compelled to have to endlessly debate their point to convince everyone else that their opinion is the correct one, and everyone else is just too stupid to realize it, when in fact it's just your opinion.

It's like the hypocrisy of another poster in here who has been going on about how he and others don't REALLY dislike Jimmy, they are just offering valid "criticisms" of his play. Spending ten pages worth of posts arguing about whether or not a pass that Jimmy threw to Deebo against Chicago last year, that resulted in a TD that helped them win the game was a good pass or not. That's not just "criticism" that's pathological. Jimmy threw it, Deebo caught it, they scored a TD, who cares.

It's also like an idea, that is popular in here and is often echoed among some of the talking head class on TV, looking at you Dan Orlovsky, which claims that it's the defense and Kyle's scheme that are primarily responsible for the team's success and that Jimmy has virtually nothing to do with it and is just along for the ride. If that were true then just about any QB of average skill should be able to do it, but so far that hasn't been the case. They win with Jimmy and lose with everyone else. Does Jimmy have his shortcomings? Absolutely, but so far he has been the only one that has manged to keep the team competitive through the course of a whole season.

Now of course the hope with Lance is that he will have a higher ceiling than Jimmy in terms of his ability to attack down the field more frequently, which seems to be the only thing that some people in here care about. They will go on about how the threat of the deep ball puts more pressure on opposing defenses and forces them to defend the whole field and yadda, yadda, yadda. But if you read between the lines a bit you will usually find that they just think it's more "entertaining" to watch a QB throw the ball all around the field then the ground and pound, short passing game which seems to have been the team's philosophy for the past few year's. I will let guys like Jonnydel sort all of that out because he clearly has more insight on it.

The book on Lance has yet to be written. I think it is everyone's hope that he will turn out to be everything the team believed he could be when they drafted him, but he is still, clearly, a work in progress, People say that the conditions in the Chicago game were a big factor in that loss. Probably, but there was a game against Washington in 2019 where it was also pouring down rain and the team had five turnovers and yet they still found a way to win it with Jimmy at the helm.

Although it was a very limited sample size, the offense did not look particularly dynamic in the first couple of drives against Seattle. They were running the ball well but there was just something about it that seemed a bit off. It was pointed out by some analyst I was watching that on Deebo's long run on a read option Lance made the wrong read on that play and should have kept the ball himself. Deebo's skill turned what looked like a sure loss into a huge gain so it worked out, which I am cool with, but it was still, apparently the wrong call by Lance, which is just his inexperience, So now this whole experiment has been put on hold for another year, which is unfortunate in some ways but may allow for the short term benefit of the team being more competitive this year.

This whole situation is an odd one with a lot of competing narratives. Steve Young, who lost two straight NFC championship games as I recall because of ill timed picks, is telling anyone who will listen that Jimmy got "fired" from the job, which is hard to argue with. Dan Orlovsky, is telling anyone who will listen that Jimmy is just along for the ride and can't get the team over the hump. This from a guy who I don't think ever took his team to an NFL playoff game. However there is someone else out there, whose name escapes me for the moment, pointing out that one of the underlying dynamics at play here is that Lance was handed the job, because of his draft status, without the benefit of actually having earned it which is something that may have led to some of the recent talk being rumored to have come out of the locker room.

When Jimmy's status was still unclear as training camp approached and the team was saying, at least publicly, that they weren't going to release him I suggested that if that were the case they should just bring him back to camp and let he and Lance compete for the job and may the best man win. That would help ease any unspoken issues among the team about who should start and might have been beneficial in terms of Lance's development in terms of making him compete for a job that he had already planned on being his. I mean, if Lance is destined to be so much better than Jimmy than he shouldn't have had any problem beating him out in camp, right?

But that's not the way things worked out and now Jimmy is back as QB1 and we'll see how far he can take us. I am of the camp who believes that Jimmy is perfectly capable of taking the team to the Super Bowl and winning it but that it will require his consistently best play to do so. There seem to be a couple of pretty good teams out there at the moment so this may well be a tougher get than their 2019 run. But, if they can pull it off, that will just make it that much sweeter. Go Niners!

The issue for me is that when the run game gets shut down, so does the entire offense. Jimmy is great at converting 3rd downs and keeping drives alive when the run game is gaining positive yards. However, when the run game isn't working and he is asked to throw the ball 40 times the offense cannot put points on the board and we typically lose those games. Imo, its because Jimmy cannot beat teams over the top with his arm. No QB in the league throws 40+ short passes in a game and wins consistently. Defenses are too good, especially in the playoffs, to get beat one dimensionally.

I think this is a fair view but I would add a couple of caveats. One, it seems that games where QB's are asked to throw the ball 40+ times are usually an exception rather than a rule so I'm not sure that's an entirely valid point. Also I would argue that Jimmy probably can't CONSISTENTLY beat teams over the top with is arm. That doesn't mean he isn't capable of doing it at all. I seem to recall he was throwing it pretty well against the saints in 2019. Jimmy's deep ball is perhaps his biggest shortcoming along with his penchant for throwing kind of head scratching picks but his release and his ability to consistently convert third and longs is pretty elite.

I would also point out that in 2019 they decimated two playoff team's defenses with their running game, to the extent that Jimmy hardly had to throw at all. Of course the narrative that evolved around that was that Kyle "took the ball" out of Jimmy's hands, I have always looked at it as they stayed with what was working so why change it and Jimmy's lack of ego helps make that possible. He honestly doesn't seem to care how they win, as long as they win.

Kyle seems to prefer running the ball and playing good defense to the more wide open game that many other teams seem to favor. Maybe they do it because they have guys like Allen or Mahomes but those kind of QB's are actually pretty rare and pretty hard to find. I don't think I have ever argued that Jimmy is an elite QB, but when he is on his game he can be pretty darn good, he just isn't always consistent. If he can play the way he is capable of playing often enough this year they could end up making a run, which I imagine is what we are all rooting for. Go Niners!
Originally posted by thl408:
The way some folks feel about Jimmy is how I feel about Kyle. Be lucky we have him even if he is flawed. Except I think Kyle can improve since he's a young coach.

Good point. All coaches are flawed. Even Bill Walsh was flawed. If he had been allowed to replace Joe Montana with Steve Young when he wanted to pull the trigger, who knows if the 49ers go on to win the 1988 or 1989 Championship trophies. Let's not even mention how many first round picks that Walsh whiffed on. No coach is perfect.
Originally posted by 49ers81:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Jimmy do work on SNF! I'll root for you as long as you are in SF. I will also be objective and know he's an avg starting NFL QB, which isn't horrible but the truth. Either way we got some pretty bad QB play across the league and guys starting that have no business being starters. Jimmy is a starter.

when Trey comes back, I will root for him to succeed and understand it's a process. You don't wake up and magically become a great pocket passing QB. It will require reps and getting through all of it. Let's be objective about all of it and understand the process. I would think there's room for 49er fans to support both.

You see, this is where you keep getting yourself in trouble. You always claim you're just being objective about something which you assert is an "obvious" truth, which is that Jimmy is an average QB. That's you're opinion and you're entitled to it but that doesn't make it true. It is a common theme in this thread and, from the opposite side posted by others in the Lance thread. People keep mistaking their opinions for some hard truth and so they feel compelled to have to endlessly debate their point to convince everyone else that their opinion is the correct one, and everyone else is just too stupid to realize it, when in fact it's just your opinion.

It's like the hypocrisy of another poster in here who has been going on about how he and others don't REALLY dislike Jimmy, they are just offering valid "criticisms" of his play. Spending ten pages worth of posts arguing about whether or not a pass that Jimmy threw to Deebo against Chicago last year, that resulted in a TD that helped them win the game was a good pass or not. That's not just "criticism" that's pathological. Jimmy threw it, Deebo caught it, they scored a TD, who cares.

It's also like an idea, that is popular in here and is often echoed among some of the talking head class on TV, looking at you Dan Orlovsky, which claims that it's the defense and Kyle's scheme that are primarily responsible for the team's success and that Jimmy has virtually nothing to do with it and is just along for the ride. If that were true then just about any QB of average skill should be able to do it, but so far that hasn't been the case. They win with Jimmy and lose with everyone else. Does Jimmy have his shortcomings? Absolutely, but so far he has been the only one that has manged to keep the team competitive through the course of a whole season.

Now of course the hope with Lance is that he will have a higher ceiling than Jimmy in terms of his ability to attack down the field more frequently, which seems to be the only thing that some people in here care about. They will go on about how the threat of the deep ball puts more pressure on opposing defenses and forces them to defend the whole field and yadda, yadda, yadda. But if you read between the lines a bit you will usually find that they just think it's more "entertaining" to watch a QB throw the ball all around the field then the ground and pound, short passing game which seems to have been the team's philosophy for the past few year's. I will let guys like Jonnydel sort all of that out because he clearly has more insight on it.

The book on Lance has yet to be written. I think it is everyone's hope that he will turn out to be everything the team believed he could be when they drafted him, but he is still, clearly, a work in progress, People say that the conditions in the Chicago game were a big factor in that loss. Probably, but there was a game against Washington in 2019 where it was also pouring down rain and the team had five turnovers and yet they still found a way to win it with Jimmy at the helm.

Although it was a very limited sample size, the offense did not look particularly dynamic in the first couple of drives against Seattle. They were running the ball well but there was just something about it that seemed a bit off. It was pointed out by some analyst I was watching that on Deebo's long run on a read option Lance made the wrong read on that play and should have kept the ball himself. Deebo's skill turned what looked like a sure loss into a huge gain so it worked out, which I am cool with, but it was still, apparently the wrong call by Lance, which is just his inexperience, So now this whole experiment has been put on hold for another year, which is unfortunate in some ways but may allow for the short term benefit of the team being more competitive this year.

This whole situation is an odd one with a lot of competing narratives. Steve Young, who lost two straight NFC championship games as I recall because of ill timed picks, is telling anyone who will listen that Jimmy got "fired" from the job, which is hard to argue with. Dan Orlovsky, is telling anyone who will listen that Jimmy is just along for the ride and can't get the team over the hump. This from a guy who I don't think ever took his team to an NFL playoff game. However there is someone else out there, whose name escapes me for the moment, pointing out that one of the underlying dynamics at play here is that Lance was handed the job, because of his draft status, without the benefit of actually having earned it which is something that may have led to some of the recent talk being rumored to have come out of the locker room.

When Jimmy's status was still unclear as training camp approached and the team was saying, at least publicly, that they weren't going to release him I suggested that if that were the case they should just bring him back to camp and let he and Lance compete for the job and may the best man win. That would help ease any unspoken issues among the team about who should start and might have been beneficial in terms of Lance's development in terms of making him compete for a job that he had already planned on being his. I mean, if Lance is destined to be so much better than Jimmy than he shouldn't have had any problem beating him out in camp, right?

But that's not the way things worked out and now Jimmy is back as QB1 and we'll see how far he can take us. I am of the camp who believes that Jimmy is perfectly capable of taking the team to the Super Bowl and winning it but that it will require his consistently best play to do so. There seem to be a couple of pretty good teams out there at the moment so this may well be a tougher get than their 2019 run. But, if they can pull it off, that will just make it that much sweeter. Go Niners!

For someone who criticized NY for stating opinions as truth, you did a lot of it yourself. "The offense did not look particularly dynamic", "there was something about it that was just off". They went 73 and 74 yards on those two drives. They only had 1 drive the rest of the game out of 8 that went as far.

Also, you mixed up the game against Washington and the game against the Steelers in 2019. We only had 1 turnover in the bad weather game against Washington, an interception by Jimmy. We also only scored 9 points and averaged 4.3 yards a play. We won because the defense did what they didn't do against the Bears and shut the Washington offense down completely for the entire game.
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by jonnydel:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Ultimately this comes down to the delicate balance of recognizing Kyle is a control-freak within his offense, which shouldn't shock anyone, vs. trying to weed out how much control/freedom his QB (Jimmy) really has within it.

Jimmy's own quotes over the years give great insight into that. In fact, Kyle's own quotes saying Jimmy had a good game in post game interviews (when we as fans may think otherwise) gives more credence to Jimmy doing what he's instructed within the play designs.

Kyle's head is buried in his playbook and playsheet. This is who he is. He controls every aspect of the offensive personnel and how it operates. It's why we hired him!

But I have this sneaky suspicion Kyle is about to let go a tad and let Jimmy incorporate his own style and preference even more now. Less blind PA's, more receiving options out there, etc. We'll see!

Mike was the same way. Steve said he used to call him, Mike "go over it one more time" Shanahan because he would sit there and hammer in the exact way to react to each and every situation with Steve. They'd go through the play calls, this is the read vs this, this is the read vs this, this is the read vs this for 300 plays. They went through it twice the morning before the super bowl. Steve said it was like Rain man.

I don't understand how this makes a coach a control freak. Are there coaches that tell their QB, "if it's Cover2 do this and this, but if you don't want to then that's okay too".
Pass plays have adjustments and progressions and reads built into them. There are route conversions by the WRs, hot routes where if it's a blitz then adjust the play accordingly.

I'll let you guys get into the details but it sure sounds like QB's are given varying degrees of "control" within their offenses. Some spread offenses are driven by the QB, so-to-speak, while other QB's are nothing but a video game controller for their HC/OC. We've seen that from Walsh to Roman to Shanahan. To the other side, you can have two QB's coached up within the same exact play design, differently. JT O'Picks-A-Lot speaks to that all the time. Sometimes that could be because of the strengths of the QB and sometimes it's dictated by the game situation (ahead or behind, strength of that defense, etc.). I think the Shanahan's are both at one extreme.

Perhaps a coach won't allow a QB to audible out of a playcall. That's the first thing I think of when I think 'control freak'. But when it comes to individual pass plays, there has to be structure to the play design so that every player is on the same page. Progressions tell the QB where to look versus what coverage. This is the NFL, there isn't a playcall that tells the QB "do whatever you want, this play diagram with progressions are just suggestions".

I gotcha. I'm talking more about game planning input, audible out, how's he's coached up within each play, etc. Kyle's biggest thing is trust my plan. My primary will be open. I don't care if you came from another system and you're most comfortable in it. This is my world now.

So when Garoppolo speaks to being the good soldier and simply doing what's asked of him by Kyle, what do you think that's referring too from your opinion?

I guess there are several areas where a coach can be a 'control freak'. Gameplanning is one that I hadn't thought of so perhaps that's a possibility to what Jimmy is referring to.
The point of contention I have is when it comes to individual plays. A coach that wants the play executed a certain way is just being a coach. I don't see anything control freakish about that. I truly don't know what Jimmy is referring to. A QB that isn't very good at ad-libbing should not be allowed to ad-lib. Maybe Jimmy doesn't agree with Kyle when it comes to this, if this is indeed what Jimmy is talking about.

Totally agree with the bold.

That's a really solid guess. 2017 the plays installed were most likely picked by Jimmy as ones he's most comfortable with and like you noted, most of his passes actually ended up becoming ad libs for a variety of reasons.

Then Kyle had his hands on him all next off season so naturally, his goal is to convert Jimmy into his system. His way. His style. His offense.

Jimmy off the bench for Trey? He didn't even know some of the play calls as they were designed for Trey so he just "played." Picked his 1on1 matchups and won (like in a spread).

Maybe Kyle and he can find a more comfortable balance now?
[ Edited by NCommand on Sep 22, 2022 at 11:23 AM ]
Jimmy Garoppolo's record is 3-7 when he has passed the ball more than 30 times and the run game has failed to gain 100 yards on the ground. This does not include games he did not start or did not finish.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
we still trying blame everyone else due to jimmys limitations .. just call the spade a spade and move on

He is available and he wins.

Those are what concern me.
beating inferior teams is fun in all, but he doesn't win when it counts due to his limitations and constant mistakes

i really hope he can change that this year, but it's year 6 now

He has won a ton of games when it counts against top teams.

The team with him has been good enough to win 2 SBs.
Originally posted by dj43:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by eastie:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
beating inferior teams is fun in all, but he doesn't win when it counts due to his limitations and constant mistakes

i really hope he can change that this year, but it's year 6 now

That's a dumb comment. He has taken this team to TWO NFC Championship games in the last three years and one Superbowl. That's the very definition of winning when it counts. Your hate for the player is clouding what you see.

The way some folks feel about Jimmy is how I feel about Kyle. Be lucky we have him even if he is flawed. Except I think Kyle can improve since he's a young coach.

+1

I will add that JG is still relatively young in terms of actual playing time. Both Kyle and Jimmy have time to improve. Some of the passes Garoppolo threw in this last game were not passes he has often attempted in previous games. (I'm thinking particularly about the 40-yard sideline throw to Aiyuk that went through his hands, and the 50/50 ball to Gray.) If Kyle will evolve and let Jimmy open up a bit more, perhaps they both reach their goal. One thing is sure, you can't keep doing the same thing over and over and expect the result to change.

dj in the Jimmy thread: "JG is still relatively young in terms of actual playing time [after nearly 40 starts]. Both Kyle and Jimmy have time to improve."

dj in the Trey thread: "He's UNDENIABLY not ready [after 5 quarters of play]."

Hmm.

Originally posted by YACBros85:
Jimmy Garoppolo's record is 3-7 when he has passed the ball more than 30 times and the run game has failed to gain 100 yards on the ground. This does not include games he did not start or did not finish.

Makes sense. If this offense isn't rushing for at least 100 yards, it usually means we're down and the passing game becomes the focal point. That's like asking Josh Allen or Patrick Mahomes to win with the running game. Not a strength.

And Jimmy nor the OL had the talent to just switch gears like that.

Their combined strength is run blocking and timely 2nd and 3rd down conversions to keep the chains moving, keeping the oppositions offense on the bench and killing it in the RZ.

Outside of that formula, it's not going to be pretty.
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Jimmy Garoppolo's record is 3-7 when he has passed the ball more than 30 times and the run game has failed to gain 100 yards on the ground. This does not include games he did not start or did not finish.

Makes sense. If this offense isn't rushing for at least 100 yards, it usually means we're down and the passing game becomes the focal point. That's like asking Josh Allen or Patrick Mahomes to win with the running game. Not a strength.

And Jimmy nor the OL had the talent to just switch gears like that.

Their combined strength is run blocking and timely 2nd and 3rd down conversions to keep the chains moving, keeping the oppositions offense on the bench and killing it in the RZ.

Outside of that formula, it's not going to be pretty.

The Bills were a better rushing team than we were last year, so I don't know about that.
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Jimmy Garoppolo's record is 3-7 when he has passed the ball more than 30 times and the run game has failed to gain 100 yards on the ground. This does not include games he did not start or did not finish.

Makes sense. If hes not getting carried we lose.
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Jimmy Garoppolo's record is 3-7 when he has passed the ball more than 30 times and the run game has failed to gain 100 yards on the ground. This does not include games he did not start or did not finish.

Makes sense. If this offense isn't rushing for at least 100 yards, it usually means we're down and the passing game becomes the focal point. That's like asking Josh Allen or Patrick Mahomes to win with the running game. Not a strength.

And Jimmy nor the OL had the talent to just switch gears like that.

Their combined strength is run blocking and timely 2nd and 3rd down conversions to keep the chains moving, keeping the oppositions offense on the bench and killing it in the RZ.

Outside of that formula, it's not going to be pretty.

The Bills were a better rushing team than we were last year, so I don't know about that.

Could they solely win with the run game?
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Jimmy Garoppolo's record is 3-7 when he has passed the ball more than 30 times and the run game has failed to gain 100 yards on the ground. This does not include games he did not start or did not finish.

Makes sense. If this offense isn't rushing for at least 100 yards, it usually means we're down and the passing game becomes the focal point. That's like asking Josh Allen or Patrick Mahomes to win with the running game. Not a strength.

And Jimmy nor the OL had the talent to just switch gears like that.

Their combined strength is run blocking and timely 2nd and 3rd down conversions to keep the chains moving, keeping the oppositions offense on the bench and killing it in the RZ.

Outside of that formula, it's not going to be pretty.

Just like the O line thread and harping about not bringing the QB into it. Lets keep this about the QB.

You don't think Mahomes or Allen would still thrive as passers if they were in the Shanny system and the run game wasn't working?

Even in a run first system, there are going to be games that you need to depend on your QB to carry the offense when the run game isn't working.
Share 49ersWebzone