Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Memphis9er:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
We almost had "that guy" in Kirk Cousins. LOL

Jimmy may have thrived in a spread offense in college but I find it hard to believe he would find extensive success if he ran one in the NFL. Again, he would be limited because of his ability to push the ball down field when neccessary. Same thing with Alex Smith. He ran alot of spread in KC with Andy Reid but when teams forced him to go vertical at a high rate, they would lose. That was the main reason why they drafted Pat Mahomes. I honestly believe that Jimmy is in an offense that best fits his skillset. But when the rushing attack isn't on its game, Jimmy has shown to be less affective and his record reflects that. Now, should Kyle go spread more often when the run game isn't working? That is a real question to ponder.

You guys with your "JiMMy cAn'T pUsH tEh bAlL dOWnTHe FIeLd" nonsense is ridiculous, and false.

Did you not see the deep out to Aiyuk that should've been caught.

should have been caught and should have been thrown better

Originally posted by jonnydel:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Memphis9er:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
We almost had "that guy" in Kirk Cousins. LOL

Jimmy may have thrived in a spread offense in college but I find it hard to believe he would find extensive success if he ran one in the NFL. Again, he would be limited because of his ability to push the ball down field when neccessary. Same thing with Alex Smith. He ran alot of spread in KC with Andy Reid but when teams forced him to go vertical at a high rate, they would lose. That was the main reason why they drafted Pat Mahomes. I honestly believe that Jimmy is in an offense that best fits his skillset. But when the rushing attack isn't on its game, Jimmy has shown to be less affective and his record reflects that. Now, should Kyle go spread more often when the run game isn't working? That is a real question to ponder.

You guys with your "JiMMy cAn'T pUsH tEh bAlL dOWnTHe FIeLd" nonsense is ridiculous, and false.

Did you not see the deep out to Aiyuk that should've been caught.

should have been caught and should have been thrown better

Should've been thrown better? I we serious? If any other qb makes this throw yall are drooling over it

This is a Let Jimmy Cook throw.

And here's the article on that: https://t.co/Fpeeo6vCDV pic.twitter.com/Jur87oSwGK

— David Lombardi (@LombardiHimself) September 20, 2022

Originally posted by Memphis9er:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
We almost had "that guy" in Kirk Cousins. LOL

Jimmy may have thrived in a spread offense in college but I find it hard to believe he would find extensive success if he ran one in the NFL. Again, he would be limited because of his ability to push the ball down field when neccessary. Same thing with Alex Smith. He ran alot of spread in KC with Andy Reid but when teams forced him to go vertical at a high rate, they would lose. That was the main reason why they drafted Pat Mahomes. I honestly believe that Jimmy is in an offense that best fits his skillset. But when the rushing attack isn't on its game, Jimmy has shown to be less affective and his record reflects that. Now, should Kyle go spread more often when the run game isn't working? That is a real question to ponder.

You guys with your "JiMMy cAn'T pUsH tEh bAlL dOWnTHe FIeLd" nonsense is ridiculous, and false.

Did you not see the deep out to Aiyuk that should've been caught.

Originally posted by random49er:
Critical Reading:

Originally posted by random49er:
Here is the current list give or take...

Originally posted by random49er:
And then Jimmy comes in @ about 46 wins.

Where were starts mentioned by me or the OP and what does it have to do with my point?

Even in giving Jimmy the benefit of the doubt (for the homers here) he's NOWHERE CLOSE to the top of any WINNINGEST list.

Is that registering yet or no??

Originally posted by krizay:

Originally posted by random49er:
Critical Reading:

Originally posted by random49er:
Here is the current list give or take...

Originally posted by random49er:
And then Jimmy comes in @ about 46 wins.

Where were starts mentioned by me or the OP and what does it have to do with my point?

Even in giving Jimmy the benefit of the doubt (for the homers here) he's NOWHERE CLOSE to the top of any WINNINGEST list.

Is that registering yet or no??

Again I understand he's not at the to of the list. That was never my argument.

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
33 + 14 = 47. QB's don't get credited for the win or the loss for games they didn't start.

You're falling for a bait and switch.

People like to argue things that were never said.

But as far as "given credit for",....I'd give plenty of credit for our last game that Jimmy won,...even if he didn't start it.

So this is a side topic we can argue for days about but does it somehow increase his "Winningest QB" status,...which was the lie I rejected?

He's nowhere close and krazy is further enhancing my point.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
should have been caught and should have been thrown better

Originally posted by eastie:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
should have been caught and should have been thrown better

Thrown better? It was right where it needed to be and our WR let it slip through his hands. It was a very good throw. This is the kind of garbage that trolls use.

Originally posted by krizay:

Originally posted by random49er:
The top of the site you just linked me to says 64 career games.



You going to continue this?

You just had a brainfart. Get over it man.

His record is in the photo you posted.

Originally posted by RiceOwensStokes:
In all seriousness, having Jimmy Garoppolo back as the starter is so surreal, I've seen a lot of crazy stuff watching this league and I thought Ive seen it all, but this might take the cake

Originally posted by Sanfran_chrisco:

Originally posted by RiceOwensStokes:
In all seriousness, having Jimmy Garoppolo back as the starter is so surreal, I've seen a lot of crazy stuff watching this league and I thought Ive seen it all, but this might take the cake

haha, agreed. really thought we'd get a full season of lance man

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
33 + 14 = 47. QB's don't get credited for the win or the loss for games they didn't start.

You're falling for a bait and switch.

People like to argue things that were never said.

But as far as "given credit for",....I'd give plenty of credit for our last game that Jimmy won,...even if he didn't start it.

So this is a side topic we can argue for days about but does it somehow increase his "Winningest QB" status,...which was the lie I rejected?

He's nowhere close and krazy is further enhancing my point.

I don't disagree with you. I was simply providing an explanation for the discrepancy. I also am not saying that Jimmy doesn't deserve credit for the win this past Sunday. Again, I was simply providing an explanation for the discrepancy on NFL stats sites. That part was not an opinion. It was a fact.

Originally posted by eastie:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
should have been caught and should have been thrown better

Thrown better? It was right where it needed to be and our WR let it slip through his hands. It was a very good throw. This is the kind of garbage that trolls use.

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by Sanfran_chrisco:

Originally posted by RiceOwensStokes:
In all seriousness, having Jimmy Garoppolo back as the starter is so surreal, I've seen a lot of crazy stuff watching this league and I thought Ive seen it all, but this might take the cake

haha, agreed. really thought we'd get a full season of lance man

Me too. I was hoping to see him take a leap as a passer. All well. At least the season isn't lost. We have a lot to be excited about.