Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Originally posted by BangBang49er:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by Sanfran_chrisco:
thank you for clarifying what you meant to say!

Lol yes. TreyDey/Rack really is a stand-up poster. I certainly see the connection here.

Lol you are so wound up

Originally posted by Sanfran_chrisco:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by BangBang49er:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by Sanfran_chrisco:
thank you for clarifying what you meant to say!

Lol yes. TreyDey/Rack really is a stand-up poster. I certainly see the connection here.

Lol you are so wound up

You do the same s**t to other posters, stop playing the victim

Originally posted by Sanfran_chrisco:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by Sanfran_chrisco:

Only makes sense to say such stuff. He wants a new contract and he wants it now,...damnit.

well he's gotta let his play on the field dictate that then and back up his words.

Originally posted by BangBang49er:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by BangBang49er:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by Sanfran_chrisco:
thank you for clarifying what you meant to say!

Lol yes. TreyDey/Rack really is a stand-up poster. I certainly see the connection here.

Lol you are so wound up

You do the same s**t to other posters, stop playing the victim

Let it go bro. It was an honest mistake. Relax.

Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Ivery said it before and I'll say ot again. Jimmy was a different qb when he got here.

Shanahan ruined him. Lance is on his way.

"I mean, I don't know we're all football players here," Edelman said about Garoppolo's injury, transcribed by NESN. "So we go into Week 4 and Jimmy was practicing and then decided not to play. Jacoby played with no ligaments in his thumb, which you can't do that as a quarterback.

"A lot of guys got mad at it. I'm not going to lie, I got mad about it," Edelman continued. "I sacrificed my body all day long. I was taking shots for this, numbing up that, ribs, broken ribs, shoulders, Grade 3 hanging on by limbs just to play. I can understand why Marty (Bennett) thinks like that."

Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Personally I think there's a middle ground. Jimmy is more conservative by nature and has a understanding that he can be successful without the deep ball. I also think that Shanny has a system and script thar he wants ran that depending on the defense and presnap.

Regardless both Jimmy and Shanny has proven they can win games without it.

Originally posted by JoseCortez:
You can't when you have a coach like Shanahan. He's handcuffed.

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Personally I think there's a middle ground. Jimmy is more conservative by nature and has a understanding that he can be successful without the deep ball. I also think that Shanny has a system and script thar he wants ran that depending on the defense and presnap.

Regardless both Jimmy and Shanny has proven they can win games without it.

They have proven they can win games without it but they haven't proven they can win the most imortant game without it.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by JoseCortez:
You can't when you have a coach like Shanahan. He's handcuffed.

What specifically is schematically different now then 2017?

Please show examples

Originally posted by JoseCortez:
2017 Jimmy was winging it. He didn't even know the playbook.

Just the start of 2018 before the acl you could see Jimmy as a different player.

Originally posted by JoseCortez:
2017 Jimmy was winging it. He didn't even know the playbook.

Just the start of 2018 before the acl you could see Jimmy as a different player.

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by JoseCortez:

2017 Jimmy was winging it. He didn't even know the playbook.

Just the start of 2018 before the acl you could see Jimmy as a different player.

7 TDs, 5 INTs over 5 games?

If anything, that 1.4 TD/INT ratio after 5 games is arguing on Shanahan's behalf.