Originally posted by OhioNiner:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by OhioNiner:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by Sanfran_chrisco:
Originally posted by DrEll:
If that Deebo TD was a pick 6 (like it should've been), the entire complexion of the game changes and we'd all be ranting about how Jimmy cost us the game.
"I saw him driving on it so I just didn't want to throw the interception," Garoppolo said. "I kind of gave it a 'either Deebo will get it or no one will' and that's about all I did on the play."
I like how a touchdown pass "should" have been a pick 6
Thank you JG thread. You can take me now. I've seen it all.
I don't know how the place would be acting if we had Stafford as our QB last night. Granted it's not a perfect comparison as he had a thrown together offensive line and our defense to face. But he arguably played worse than Jimmy against Denver last week. One pick six thrown, another interception that should have been caught by by Gipson in our end zone, sacked 7 times with a lost fumble on the last one. He's inching up towards the record of career pick sixes thrown, held by Favre. I can accept that overall he's a "better" QB than Jimmy. But he's definitely not worlds better and when he's bad he can look, well as bad if not worse than bad Jimmy. It's kind of funny because I for fun googled some stuff last night and there's a decent, well Seahawks piece on Stafford with an embedded Twitter conversation between Richard Sherman and Orlovsky .
I'd personally love if we had some more Sherman type perspectives around here than the Orlovsky type ones that sometimes are all too prevalent.
That's what I've been telling people since the NFCCG.
When you're QB is under 35%+ pressure rate and < 2.5ypc (no run game), no QB is going to transcend that. Stafford faced that week 1 and week 4 and he crumbled like I expected.
Fans really need to spend more time looking at the context of games and understanding the true circumstances.
No doubt we can still evaluate QB play, the good, the misses, etc. too. We can do both.
Yes, they should have applied this to the Bears game. But did not for some strange reason. I wonder what it could be...
Again, I'd say a lot of it is on that crowd I just mentioned.
I don't think anyone should have an issue at this point saying Jimmy is not a franchise or great QB. Some people seem to literally say he's great. Well, he's not "great".
But if he plays within himself and doesn't make stupid turnovers he can certainly play his part in wins.
When there's that crowd that, as I said, pretty much finds ways to single handedly blame Jimmy for every loss and even nitpick and hand wring about what he may have done wrong in wins, even if it's not a majority of the fan base, they are indeed very loud and it's kinda only natural that there's going to be at least some people who take that and unload on Trey when he's less than perfect.
He makes very key passes in the middle of the field, passes that lead to wins. His 1D% is always near the top of the league, and that's a winner stat. Moving the chains leads to wins. He has weaknesses, but they're not enough to make you a bad team. But if he plays like last night, that's enough to get us over the hump.