Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
The term hater is used to incite those who criticize Jimmy. Exactly what random stated and the exact point I was trying to make. The terms used should be critic and defender. You are a Jimmy critic or a Jimmy defender. If those two terms were used, there would be a lot less bs and a lot more solid discussion in this thread.
Sorry bro, but this is BS. There are a few of you who are genuinely criticizing Jimmy. I don't think anyone disagrees with most of that type of criticism. The problem is the small but very loud group of over the top posters who say ridiculous things like Jimmy was to blame for the Aiyuk touchdown and Kittle drop against Green Bay, Jimmy sucks, Jimmy is getting carried, etc. What would help is if the group of genuine criticizers pushed back against this loud group of haters and told them to go pound sand. Or if the mods just booted them out for not contributing to the discussion.
Again, there is no counter to the group of loud haters. None. No one is saying Jimmy is elite, or great, or carrying the team, etc. NO ONE. So stop comparing the two groups as if it's even on both sides, because it's not.
But to what point? That is the question I keep asking myself. Most of that crowd have been saying the exact same thing for at least three years. Everyone who spends anytime is this forum knows who they are and what they think but every day it's just some variation on the same thing. There is the poster who literally put up GIF after GIF from different angles to "prove" that a pass that hit Kittle in the hands in a game last year and was dropped was really Jimmy's fault because it was six inches to the left of where
he thought it should be and now he is using the same argument on the pass that Aiyuk couldn't haul in the end zone last week.
Then there is the poster who is just being "objective" when he slams Jimmy every week for being,
in his mind, "a below average QB", at least when he isn't calling him out and out trash or offering some condescending take on how Jimmy has played "okay" the last few games.
And then there is the poster who spent pages and pages arguing about how a pass to Deebo that went for a TD against Chicago a couple of years ago was really a badly thrown ball. He caught it. They scored a TD. Who cares? The team could win a game by 30 points and they would all still be in here complaining about a pass that was "almost" intercepted, or a missed throw to a "wide open" receiver who, when Jonnydel does his film breakdown, will turn out to have been not that wide open at all. I mean it's just endless and non stop complaining that I am convinced is often done just for effect or to try and prove that they are smarter than the rest of us who are, as put forth in one notable post, just 'too stupid" to know how bad a QB Jimmy is.
I mean, who do they think their audience is? Do they think John Lynch or Kyle Shanahan are making a point of monitoring this forum so they can get a "handle" on what the fans think? Do they think Jimmy comes in here to see how he can improve his game, according to all of the armchair QBs in here? Do they think their "criticisms" change any single aspect of what has or will happen in Jimmy's tenure as the 49er's QB or is it just a bunch of impotent venting because they're still pissed off that he missed that throw to Sanders. Or is it some arrogant and block headed argument that because we had Joe and Steve and John Brodie that the we "as true 49er fans"
deserve a better QB than Jimmy, who has helped take the team to two NFC Championship games and a Super Bowl in the two years he has been healthy enough to finish a season. Steve Young lost two NFC Championship games in a row before he finally got over the hump and I think that most will agree he was probably a better QB than Jimmy. I have no doubt that if social media had been a thing back in Steve's day that he would have excoriated in exactly the same way that Jimmy has been by the "real fans".
Jimmy's game is what it is. He is, by almost any
truly objective standard, a solid second tier starter in this league who is capable of playing at a really high level but will also make plays that leave you scratching your head. Never having personally played QB at any level I don't pretend to know why that is the case or what he is seeing, or not seeing, that leads to those miss throws and picks. I imagine part of it is his own confidence in that release of his and his willingness to try and fit throws into tight windows. His deep ball isn't particularly good but that isn't really a big deal to me because I like ground and pound, short play action over the middle where the receivers can take a five yard slant to the house. I've never been all that impressed by the 50 yard bomb. "Oh, but it makes the defense have to defend the whole field", yeah, so who cares. I'd rather just ram it down their throats and beat them into submission. But I am perfectly willing to admit that it is just a personal preference and others may have a different take. In any case it's on to Mexico where the team will have another chance to put all of the pieces together and have a truly dominating performance over a division opponent who has often been a thorn in our sides. Go Niners!