Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
He has had 1 poor game this season and that was the DEN game. He has had a poor play here and there but other than that he has been solid this season.

I thought the KC game was poor it was mostly good but the bad outweighed the good making it not a good game. Go back and look at that INT from holding the ball not getting it out into the blitz. Also holding the ball, getting strip sacked. Finally, he got safetied from holding the ball in his own endzone which was clownish. The problems as usual stem from not getting it out quick, which I am noticing improvement recently. CMC effect helping as it is drawing the D away, opening up some space out there.

The 1st half vs. SD wasn't good either. Picked it up come the 2nd half.

Wasn't good in the 1st quarter of the ARI game either since we couldn't get the offense moving on two straight drives. Am I doing this right?

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
He has had 1 poor game this season and that was the DEN game. He has had a poor play here and there but other than that he has been solid this season.

I thought the KC game was poor it was mostly good but the bad outweighed the good making it not a good game. Go back and look at that INT from holding the ball not getting it out into the blitz. Also holding the ball, getting strip sacked. Finally, he got safetied from holding the ball in his own endzone which was clownish. The problems as usual stem from not getting it out quick, which I am noticing improvement recently. CMC effect helping as it is drawing the D away, opening up some space out there.

The 1st half vs. SD wasn't good either. Picked it up come the 2nd half.

Wasn't good in the 1st quarter of the ARI game either since we couldn't get the offense moving on two straight drives. Am I doing this right?

He did almost get kittle killed early tho

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by Sanfran_chrisco:
from John Lynch



"COMMAND" of our offense

So Lynch thought he was pretty darn good during that stretch in 2017, but doesn't mention his play from the last 4 seasons. Hmm.

Everyone's in shock that Jimmy had a sound game from start to finish with 4TDs,....given these players, lol.

I dont think they realize that they're making the argument for why we drafted another QB early last year.

I still don't get why it's shocking that he was able to play a great game. Kinda disrespectful to the guy with this talent.

Originally posted by captveg:
I really don't see a scenario where they bring back Jimmy G for 2023. He's played really well the last month, but he still is not a QB that is going to will his team to victory as an off schedule playmaker, which is often needed in the playoffs, and that's the intrigue and potential with Lance.

Here's the two ways this plays out IMO, and they both lead to Jimmy being gone in 2023:

1. 49ers don't win the SB. Even if Jimmy continues to play really well, if they don't win the SB it's hard to see them sticking with him when they want to see Lance bring that extra level that will get them over the top. Pressure still there on Shanalynch, so gotta see if Lance can be that final piece, so need to get him the experience sooner rather than later.

2. 49ers win the SB. Okay, they pull it out. Guess what? That means even more patience is available for Lance since the team has made it to the top, and Lance longterm has the most potential to keep that top level for years to come, so gotta get him playing time to reach that level sooner rather than later. Less pressure on Shanalynch, so why not use that to their advantage to get Lance going?

The logical choice in either scenario is to bring the future into the present and start Lance in 2023.

Based on what exactly? Certainly not any of his game performances with the 49ers. I never ceased to be amazed by all of the magical thinking that has swirled around Lance from the moment he was drafted. Most of the guys in that class who were supposed to be the better prospects already look like they are going to flame out, with the possible exception of Fields who looks like he is finding his game a little. Lance may develop into a fine QB but he has yet to really show anything at the NFL level that would justify all of this attention..

Originally posted by dj43:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by dj43:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by dj43:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
saleh would probably give jimmy the bag for '23

If Jimmy plays like this the rest of the year there's gonna be a bidding war.

Jimmy has plenty of money. If things work out in the best possible way (Super Bowl win), he'll take less money to stay here. Book it.

Spotrac has estimated Garoppolo's market value at $34M/yr with the new cap. That would set him at the #12-14 slot among QBs. If that happened, it would pay him roughly the same value as compared to the cap as his prior contract. As you say, "Book it."

Yeah I don't know why people think Jimmy would take $10M a year to be the backup to Trey after playing the way he's been playing this season lol.

He wouldn't. He wouldn't take only 34m/year either. His haters want to see him hurt financially by resigning to a team friendly deal, but there is no reason he shouldn't get paid at least as much as someone like Kyler Murray, who he has outplayed.

Garoppolo has already demonstrated he is more interested in being here, on a good team than trying to match some very bad contracts that should never have been offered in the first place.

In the past, Spotrac has been very good at predicting market value and where a particular player might land.

Idk, 34 mil can certainly boost this team even more in FA

I would rather invest that money in a high-quality QB than overpay for a UFA as is usually the case in FA.

He has 10+ games to prove he's a high-quality QB and it's not just an excellent supporting cast that makes him look better than what he is.

There's no rush or no worries @ this point in the season. Having a backup QB that can execute is something you should probably enjoy instead of worrying about next year.

Alot is going to happen in 10 games, but we wont be allowed to face the Cardinals for all 10.

Originally posted by dj43:

Spotrac has estimated Garoppolo's market value at $34M/yr with the new cap. That would set him at the #12-14 slot among QBs. If that happened, it would pay him roughly the same value as compared to the cap as his prior contract. As you say, "Book it."

Doesn't matter until the year's over. It can swing all the way down the $6 or $7M. So leave room for the gray area in-between. 10+ more games.

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by krizay:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by krizay:
With the exception of his int% he is actually having a very similar statistical season as he did in 2019 with far less talent around him

LOL what? Dude no. The talent on this offense has All Pro level players at every position, and all are still in their prime: McCaffrey: former All Pro. Deebo: former All Pro. Trent Williams: former All Pro. Kittle: former All Pro.

By the end of the season his QBR will be where it always is: in the top third or so of starters.

I meant far less talent in 2019. As in, in 2019 with far less talent he's putting up thr same numbers (except int%).

The credit is being given to his talent this year. Merely pointing out he did the same in 19 with less talent

The problem with 2022's Jimmy stats is that he's played at two wild extremes. So the average is not going to tell an accurate picture yet. Lately he's been playing well. If he continues, this will hands down be his best season.

He has had 1 poor game this season and that was the DEN game. He has had a poor play here and there but other than that he has been solid this season.

He played poorly in Atlanta too. An abysmal 6.00 adjusted yards per attempt, his second lowest passer rating AND QBR of the year, and we converted a mere 37.5% of third downs. By contrast, we've been over 50% the last three games.

IGAF about passer rating or QBR tbh. Both are dumb stats. That is not the way I saw it in the ATL game. But you're entitled to your opinion.

A stat cant be "dumb." It's all about your interpretation of it and how you use it.

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
He has had 1 poor game this season and that was the DEN game. He has had a poor play here and there but other than that he has been solid this season.

I thought the KC game was poor it was mostly good but the bad outweighed the good making it not a good game. Go back and look at that INT from holding the ball not getting it out into the blitz. Also holding the ball, getting strip sacked. Finally, he got safetied from holding the ball in his own endzone which was clownish. The problems as usual stem from not getting it out quick, which I am noticing improvement recently. CMC effect helping as it is drawing the D away, opening up some space out there.

The 1st half vs. SD wasn't good either. Picked it up come the 2nd half.

Wasn't good in the 1st quarter of the ARI game either since we couldn't get the offense moving on two straight drives. Am I doing this right?

A half and a quarter aren't equivalent so statistically speaking, no.

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
He has had 1 poor game this season and that was the DEN game. He has had a poor play here and there but other than that he has been solid this season.

I thought the KC game was poor it was mostly good but the bad outweighed the good making it not a good game. Go back and look at that INT from holding the ball not getting it out into the blitz. Also holding the ball, getting strip sacked. Finally, he got safetied from holding the ball in his own endzone which was clownish. The problems as usual stem from not getting it out quick, which I am noticing improvement recently. CMC effect helping as it is drawing the D away, opening up some space out there.

The 1st half vs. SD wasn't good either. Picked it up come the 2nd half.

Wasn't good in the 1st quarter of the ARI game either since we couldn't get the offense moving on two straight drives. Am I doing this right?

Lol seriously. It's comedy at this point.

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by krizay:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by krizay:
With the exception of his int% he is actually having a very similar statistical season as he did in 2019 with far less talent around him

LOL what? Dude no. The talent on this offense has All Pro level players at every position, and all are still in their prime: McCaffrey: former All Pro. Deebo: former All Pro. Trent Williams: former All Pro. Kittle: former All Pro.

By the end of the season his QBR will be where it always is: in the top third or so of starters.

I meant far less talent in 2019. As in, in 2019 with far less talent he's putting up thr same numbers (except int%).

The credit is being given to his talent this year. Merely pointing out he did the same in 19 with less talent

The problem with 2022's Jimmy stats is that he's played at two wild extremes. So the average is not going to tell an accurate picture yet. Lately he's been playing well. If he continues, this will hands down be his best season.

He has had 1 poor game this season and that was the DEN game. He has had a poor play here and there but other than that he has been solid this season.

He played poorly in Atlanta too. An abysmal 6.00 adjusted yards per attempt, his second lowest passer rating AND QBR of the year, and we converted a mere 37.5% of third downs. By contrast, we've been over 50% the last three games.

IGAF about passer rating or QBR tbh. Both are dumb stats. That is not the way I saw it in the ATL game. But you're entitled to your opinion.

A stat cant be "dumb." It's all about your interpretation of it and how you use it.

Okay. Maybe dumb wasn't the correct word. Neither stat is consistent. Those stats are for uninformed fans who are too lazy to do the legwork themselves.

By the way: When you have to ban someone, all you do is prove you fear what they have to say and can't argue against it. SJWs love bans.

Originally posted by RiceOwensStokes:

I see this version is extra large.. the NY edition of the form perhaps

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
He has had 1 poor game this season and that was the DEN game. He has had a poor play here and there but other than that he has been solid this season.

I thought the KC game was poor it was mostly good but the bad outweighed the good making it not a good game. Go back and look at that INT from holding the ball not getting it out into the blitz. Also holding the ball, getting strip sacked. Finally, he got safetied from holding the ball in his own endzone which was clownish. The problems as usual stem from not getting it out quick, which I am noticing improvement recently. CMC effect helping as it is drawing the D away, opening up some space out there.

The 1st half vs. SD wasn't good either. Picked it up come the 2nd half.

Wasn't good in the 1st quarter of the ARI game either since we couldn't get the offense moving on two straight drives. Am I doing this right?

A half and a quarter aren't equivalent so statistically speaking, no.

But if we are going to nitpick, we got to do it right.

Originally posted by WhyQBsAreGood:
Steve Young was a great QB for the same reasons Jimmy has been Top 12 since he got here.

It's not because of these highlight reel scrambles. . . .

Maybe you can get this in b4,....what do you think his contract numbers look like this offseason? Per yr? GTD Money?

guys its not too late to take back these jimmy and steve young comparisons. please take them back, before the ghost of bill walsh is angered