There are 187 users in the forums

Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Shop 49ers game tickets
Originally posted by tankle104:
This isn't directed at anyone but in general - all three phases depend on each other. Each one's performance benefits the other.

Jimmy definitely put our defense in a position to be better because of the offenses Efficiency. He may not of been a great deep threat etc, but he was very good at certain things.

Sure they benefit each other. But furlow isn't even talking about offensive efficiency. It's just time of possession.

2.minutes of time.of possession or the addition of Richard Sherman, Emmanuel Moseley Nick Bosa Kwon Alexander pre injury and Dre Greenlaw. You can't tell me Jimmy had a bigger effect.on the Ds improvement than adding that group.
  • Furlow
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 21,663
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by tankle104:
This isn't directed at anyone but in general - all three phases depend on each other. Each one's performance benefits the other.

Jimmy definitely put our defense in a position to be better because of the offenses Efficiency. He may not of been a great deep threat etc, but he was very good at certain things.

Sure they benefit each other. But furlow isn't even talking about offensive efficiency. It's just time of possession.

2.minutes of time.of possession or the addition of Richard Sherman, Emmanuel Moseley Nick Bosa Kwon Alexander pre injury and Dre Greenlaw. You can't tell me Jimmy had a bigger effect.on the Ds improvement than adding that group.

Of course I'm talking about offensive efficiency. 3rd down conversions. All of that plays a part in TOP. Why are you so resistant to the FACT that good QB play helps the defense?
  • Furlow
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 21,663
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by tankle104:
You're fooling yourself if you think Jimmie's efficiency didn't impact the defense in a positive way. Get over it

was he great? No. Boo hoo. Damn good though

Never said he didn't have an impact. Furlow is crediting it ALL to Jimmy. If the Raiders improve defensively it will single handindly be Jimmy's impact.

It's utter nonsense.

For 2017, it was ALL. We didn't add anyone on defense during the season. How would you explain these improvements to the defense, during the 2017 season?

Defense was giving up 25.8 PPG before Jimmy became the starter; 19.8 PPG once Jimmy became starter.

Average TOP was 27:31 before Jimmy became starter; 32:54 once Jimmy became the starter.
  • Furlow
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 21,663
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
10 minute advantage in TOP in Superbowl. Guess.the Chiefs D could withstand car crashes better.

Yeah find one single data point to refute 5 seasons worth of data. About the most intellectually dishonest way to argue one's point.
Originally posted by Furlow:
Of course I'm talking about offensive efficiency. 3rd down conversions. All of that plays a part in TOP. Why are you so resistant to the FACT that good QB play helps the defense?

Why are you resistant to the fact that talented players on defense help the defense more than how much time they are on the field.

Nick Bosa helped the 2019 defense more than Jimmy did. Full stop. To argue otherwise is insane. Doesn't mean Jimmy had NOTHING to do with it. BUT Bosa was a bigger factor by a mile.
Originally posted by Furlow:
For 2017, it was ALL. We didn't add anyone on defense during the season. How would you explain these improvements to the defense, during the 2017 season?

Defense was giving up 25.8 PPG before Jimmy became the starter; 19.8 PPG once Jimmy became starter.

Average TOP was 27:31 before Jimmy became starter; 32:54 once Jimmy became the starter.

That's also insane. Giving the players who improved on D no credit whatsoever. Jimmy was absolutely a factor but ALL the credit?
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by tankle104:
You're fooling yourself if you think Jimmie's efficiency didn't impact the defense in a positive way. Get over it

was he great? No. Boo hoo. Damn good though

Never said he didn't have an impact. Furlow is crediting it ALL to Jimmy. If the Raiders improve defensively it will single handindly be Jimmy's impact.

It's utter nonsense.

For 2017, it was ALL. We didn't add anyone on defense during the season. How would you explain these improvements to the defense, during the 2017 season?

Defense was giving up 25.8 PPG before Jimmy became the starter; 19.8 PPG once Jimmy became starter.

Average TOP was 27:31 before Jimmy became starter; 32:54 once Jimmy became the starter.

Gents - let's just agree that Jimmy was an above average QB that helped lead us to a lot of wins and made our defense better?
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by tankle104:
You're fooling yourself if you think Jimmie's efficiency didn't impact the defense in a positive way. Get over it

was he great? No. Boo hoo. Damn good though

Never said he didn't have an impact. Furlow is crediting it ALL to Jimmy. If the Raiders improve defensively it will single handindly be Jimmy's impact.

It's utter nonsense.

For 2017, it was ALL. We didn't add anyone on defense during the season. How would you explain these improvements to the defense, during the 2017 season?

Defense was giving up 25.8 PPG before Jimmy became the starter; 19.8 PPG once Jimmy became starter.

Average TOP was 27:31 before Jimmy became starter; 32:54 once Jimmy became the starter.

Gents - let's just agree that Jimmy was an above average QB that helped lead us to a lot of wins and made our defense better?

Does anyone not agree with that? Seems obvious

  • Furlow
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 21,663
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by Furlow:
For 2017, it was ALL. We didn't add anyone on defense during the season. How would you explain these improvements to the defense, during the 2017 season?

Defense was giving up 25.8 PPG before Jimmy became the starter; 19.8 PPG once Jimmy became starter.

Average TOP was 27:31 before Jimmy became starter; 32:54 once Jimmy became the starter.

That's also insane. Giving the players who improved on D no credit whatsoever. Jimmy was absolutely a factor but ALL the credit?

JFC man. Of course the players on defense get credit for making tackles, stops, sacks, interceptions. But no, they do not get credit for that TURNAROUND because they had nothing to do with it. Do you think they just coincidentally decided to start playing better once Jimmy got there? Give me a break.

It's like you guys intentionally misinterpret words and opinions just so you can argue.
  • Furlow
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 21,663
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by tankle104:
You're fooling yourself if you think Jimmie's efficiency didn't impact the defense in a positive way. Get over it

was he great? No. Boo hoo. Damn good though

Never said he didn't have an impact. Furlow is crediting it ALL to Jimmy. If the Raiders improve defensively it will single handindly be Jimmy's impact.

It's utter nonsense.

For 2017, it was ALL. We didn't add anyone on defense during the season. How would you explain these improvements to the defense, during the 2017 season?

Defense was giving up 25.8 PPG before Jimmy became the starter; 19.8 PPG once Jimmy became starter.

Average TOP was 27:31 before Jimmy became starter; 32:54 once Jimmy became the starter.

Gents - let's just agree that Jimmy was an above average QB that helped lead us to a lot of wins and made our defense better?

I can agree to that. Hell I'll even capitulate and say that the improvement in 2017 wasn't "100%" from Jimmy. But these guys are trying to give Jimmy zero credit and instead make it sound like the defense just operates as it's own unit totally separate from the offense, QB, special teams, etc. That is crazy talk. Every facet of football affects the others, this is a very basic tenet of the game.
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by tankle104:
You're fooling yourself if you think Jimmie's efficiency didn't impact the defense in a positive way. Get over it

was he great? No. Boo hoo. Damn good though

Never said he didn't have an impact. Furlow is crediting it ALL to Jimmy. If the Raiders improve defensively it will single handindly be Jimmy's impact.

It's utter nonsense.

For 2017, it was ALL. We didn't add anyone on defense during the season. How would you explain these improvements to the defense, during the 2017 season?

Defense was giving up 25.8 PPG before Jimmy became the starter; 19.8 PPG once Jimmy became starter.

Average TOP was 27:31 before Jimmy became starter; 32:54 once Jimmy became the starter.

Gents - let's just agree that Jimmy was an above average QB that helped lead us to a lot of wins and made our defense better?

I can agree to that. Hell I'll even capitulate and say that the improvement in 2017 wasn't "100%" from Jimmy. But these guys are trying to give Jimmy zero credit and instead make it sound like the defense just operates as it's own unit totally separate from the offense, QB, special teams, etc. That is crazy talk. Every facet of football affects the others, this is a very basic tenet of the game.
it goes both ways.. thousands of posts blamed solely the defense, coach or whatever when we lost big games
[ Edited by 49AllTheTime on Mar 16, 2023 at 8:50 AM ]
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by thl408:
f**k the Raiders. My Raider buddies feel so stupid after all the crap they talked about Jimmy when he was a 49er. I hope he stinks it up in LV. No, I don't hate Jimmy, I hate the Raiders.

He could play well and they could still be terrible. That defense needs a lot of work.

Raiders had a -8 turnover ratio and average TOP of 30:10 per game. I'd imagine Jimmy gives a bump to both of those, which will help the defense. Their defense was 19th in rushing yards per game allowed and 29th in passing yards per game allowed. 30th in sacks. 26th in 3rd down percentage/stops.

Well, that completely depends on a few things.

1) was 2022 an aberration in terms of him not throwing many interceptions, or has he improved to the point where he IS 2022 Jimmy and not 2017-2021 Jimmy?

2) is Jimmy's 3rd down conversion rate a reflection of Jimmy or Kyle? Remember, Nick Mullens and all the terrible QBs we have had have all had good 3rd down conversion percentages for us. Jimmy's was better than Mullens, Beathard, etc., but not by as wide a margin as you would assume based on the talent gap between them.

Time will tell.

Even in years where Jimmy had more turnovers than 2022, he still affected our TOP which helped the defense.

CJ Beathard's passer rating on 3rd down in 2017 was 78.1.
Nick Mullens passer rating on 3rd down in 2018 was 74.1.
Jimmy's passer rating on 3rd down in 2019 was 101.9. In 2021 it was 96.3. In 2022 it was 112.8.

Jimmy was also good in 2017, not so much in 2018 nor 2020. Didn't add those because the sample size is pretty small. But to say that Jimmy wasn't much better than Beathard or Mullens on 3rd down is false. He was, and it made a huge difference. Will he continue that with the Raiders? We'll see. What we do have are some baselines for the Raiders defense before Jimmy became the starter, so it will be fun to compare.

I know Jimmy affected TOP in a positive way even in the years with more turnovers. Thats why I tried to separate the two things in my post.

I am not concerned with passer rating, I am concerned with 3rd down conversions. I bet you if you find those stats you will be surprised at how close they are compared to how not close the passer rating stats are.

In 2019, Jimmy was #1 in the NFL in 3rd down conversion rate (50%) - https://clutchpoints.com/49ers-news-jimmy-garoppolo-led-all-nfl-qbs-on-3rd-conversions-this-season

Last year he converted at 51% through week 12 (latest article I could find on it) - https://www.ninersnation.com/2022/11/25/23476548/49ers-jimmy-garoppolo-third-downs

Call me crazy but I'm pretty sure neither Mullens nor Beathard were anywhere close to that type of production on 3rd down.

https://www.footballdb.com/statistics/nfl/player-splits/passing/third-down/2020?sort=passfd

2020:
Nick Mullens was at 40%.
CJ Beathard was at 38%
Jimmy G was at 42%

This was from the same season, so it was a fairly even playing field for all 3 QBs. Like I said, yes, Jimmy was better than the other guys. But considering how much better of a QB he is than them, one would assume he should be MUCH better than them at converting 3rd downs. He wasnt.

So you think that cherry picking 2020, a season in which Jimmy played multiple games with a high ankle sprain only to end up missing the rest of the season due to that injury getting worse - counters the rest of those seasons? All with better passer rating and significantly higher 3rd down conversion rate?


LOL at cherry picking. Figured you would have some issue with the stats. Comparing the season where they all played with the same roster seems like a pretty good comparison to me.

You dont like it? Fine. Jimmy leading the league at 50% in 2019, was only 10% better than Nick Mullens (a vastly inferior quarterback) in 2020. While Jimmy was the top guy in the league in 2019, Mullens was a middle of the pack QB in 2020. That isnt telling to you?

Since Mullens is a QB2 at best (but realistically a QB3), it is completely logical to say that Kyle Shanahan had a massive impact on Mullens success on third down. And to a slightly lesser extent, that applies to CJ Beathard as well. It would be disingenuous to believe that Kyle is the reason why those two had decent success on third down, but that he isnt A reason why Jimmy has really good success on third down.
Headline from Albert Breer..

Raiders View Jimmy Garoppolo as Better Culture Fit Than Derek Carr
Share 49ersWebzone