Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Originally posted by 49erF90:
Thank you, Jimmy for leading our team to becoming a contender again. Except for the seasons where you're mostly injured, our team produced winning seasons including a Super Bowl appearance and 3 NFC championships after almost a decade of dormant and frustrating experience for us fans. Good luck and good health with the Raiders.

💯

hasnt signed his contract yet…press conference postponed….jimmy is coming back

Originally posted by Young2Owens:
hasnt signed his contract yet…press conference postponed….jimmy is coming back

I heard he failed the STD test

Originally posted by blizzuntz:

Originally posted by Young2Owens:
hasnt signed his contract yet…press conference postponed….jimmy is coming back

I heard he failed the STD test

nfl in vegas is a bad idea

courtesy the one and only guy who doesn't take days off.. Mr Jack Hammer

49ers fans should thank Jimmy Garoppolo

https://49ers.pressdemocrat.com/49ers-fans-should-thank-jimmy-garoppolo/

Which one of you is this? Lol

Originally posted by Young2Owens:
hasnt signed his contract yet…press conference postponed….jimmy is coming back

Hmm failed physical perhaps?

Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:

Originally posted by 49erF90:
Thank you, Jimmy for leading our team to becoming a contender again. Except for the seasons where you're mostly injured, our team produced winning seasons including a Super Bowl appearance and 3 NFC championships after almost a decade of dormant and frustrating experience for us fans. Good luck and good health with the Raiders.

💯

Maybe they have a big acquisition and need to restructure cap space? Raiders definitely aren't as professional as other teams. Bad optics.
This isn't on Jimmy. Don Yee will protect him

Originally posted by Furlow:
So you have no answer, other than the same nonsense about "the defenders had nothing to do with it." What specifically did they "have to do with it?" Did a starter or starters change? Did the defensive play calls change? Did someone come back from injury? Or you are referring to the obvious facts (that I already qualified even though it's not necessary) that the defensive players actually physically lined up and played the plays?

The Raiders is a different story, because it will be a different season. If they have different starters, a different DC, etc - then there will be other variables to discuss and assign credit or blame if the defense improves or gets worse. For the 2017 Niners, I'm still waiting to hear what those changes in variables were.

Well let's take the Jags game for example. Believe the 9ers forced 3 turnovers in the game from memory. Are you suggesting those happened strictly because the defense was rested more than previously? Only variable it could possibly be?

But interesting you are now walking back the Raider stuff. Glad that you realize the other changes they make will actually matter.

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by Young2Owens:
hasnt signed his contract yet…press conference postponed….jimmy is coming back

Hmm failed physical perhaps?

Giants fans screaming Carlos Correa lol.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by Furlow:
So you have no answer, other than the same nonsense about "the defenders had nothing to do with it." What specifically did they "have to do with it?" Did a starter or starters change? Did the defensive play calls change? Did someone come back from injury? Or you are referring to the obvious facts (that I already qualified even though it's not necessary) that the defensive players actually physically lined up and played the plays?

The Raiders is a different story, because it will be a different season. If they have different starters, a different DC, etc - then there will be other variables to discuss and assign credit or blame if the defense improves or gets worse. For the 2017 Niners, I'm still waiting to hear what those changes in variables were.

Well let's take the Jags game for example. Believe the 9ers forced 3 turnovers in the game from memory. Are you suggesting those happened strictly because the defense was rested more than previously? Only variable it could possibly be?

But interesting you are now walking back the Raider stuff. Glad that you realize the other changes they make will actually matter.

We also faced the horrendous Bears team and a Rams team that clinched and rested everyone against us.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by Furlow:
So you have no answer, other than the same nonsense about "the defenders had nothing to do with it." What specifically did they "have to do with it?" Did a starter or starters change? Did the defensive play calls change? Did someone come back from injury? Or you are referring to the obvious facts (that I already qualified even though it's not necessary) that the defensive players actually physically lined up and played the plays?

The Raiders is a different story, because it will be a different season. If they have different starters, a different DC, etc - then there will be other variables to discuss and assign credit or blame if the defense improves or gets worse. For the 2017 Niners, I'm still waiting to hear what those changes in variables were.

Well let's take the Jags game for example. Believe the 9ers forced 3 turnovers in the game from memory. Are you suggesting those happened strictly because the defense was rested more than previously? Only variable it could possibly be?

But interesting you are now walking back the Raider stuff. Glad that you realize the other changes they make will actually matter.

Always looking for singular outliers to argue against a larger data set. Bro just stop.

Edit: I was at the Jags game in 2017. It was cold and windy. That was definitely the reason for the 3 turnovers. Had nothing to with Jimmy or the defense. It was just luck. Am I doing this right?

And I'm not walking back anything. We don't know what the Raiders are going to do on defense. But it's highly unusual for a team to have the exact same starters on either side of the ball, so logically there will be at least some room for discussion of other variables.

Speaking of variables, still waiting for which variables you feel changed in 2017 for the defense to improve after Jimmy became the starter.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by Furlow:
So you have no answer, other than the same nonsense about "the defenders had nothing to do with it." What specifically did they "have to do with it?" Did a starter or starters change? Did the defensive play calls change? Did someone come back from injury? Or you are referring to the obvious facts (that I already qualified even though it's not necessary) that the defensive players actually physically lined up and played the plays?

The Raiders is a different story, because it will be a different season. If they have different starters, a different DC, etc - then there will be other variables to discuss and assign credit or blame if the defense improves or gets worse. For the 2017 Niners, I'm still waiting to hear what those changes in variables were.

Well let's take the Jags game for example. Believe the 9ers forced 3 turnovers in the game from memory. Are you suggesting those happened strictly because the defense was rested more than previously? Only variable it could possibly be?

But interesting you are now walking back the Raider stuff. Glad that you realize the other changes they make will actually matter.

We also faced the horrendous Bears team and a Rams team that clinched and rested everyone against us.

That horrendous Bears team that had a top 10 defense (9th in points allowed, 10th in yards allowed, 7th in passing yards allowed and 5th in passing TD's allowed), that we played on the road?

Originally posted by Furlow:
Always looking for singular outliers to argue against a larger data set. Bro just stop.

Edit: I was at the Jags game in 2017. It was cold and windy. That was definitely the reason for the 3 turnovers. Had nothing to with Jimmy or the defense. It was just luck. Am I doing this right?

And I'm not walking back anything. We don't know what the Raiders are going to do on defense. But it's highly unusual for a team to have the exact same starters on either side of the ball, so logically there will be at least some room for discussion of other variables.

Speaking of variables, still waiting for which variables you feel changed in 2017 for the defense to improve after Jimmy became the starter.

Said my piece on it. Not gonna rehash. It won't matter what I say because you've convinced yourself that Jimmy is the reason and will never be convinced otherwise.