There are 262 users in the forums

Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Shop 49ers game tickets
Mar 16, 2023 at 6:58 PM
Originally posted by Furlow:
You've "said your piece" plenty. But you have yet to answer which variables changed. I'm open to hearing about them. But simply stating the obvious that the defensive players were the ones that went out there and made the plays does nothing to further this discussion.

I did answer it you just won't accept that how the opposition offense is playing, how the defense played that given day, improvement of young players, players getting healthy, opposition resting players and the like factor in. You want zero sum.

Defensive players had nothing to do with it. Again your words. So clearly mind is made up. Not open at all.
[ Edited by 9ers4eva on Mar 16, 2023 at 6:59 PM ]
Mar 16, 2023 at 8:34 PM
Originally posted by blizzuntz:
Originally posted by Young2Owens:
hasnt signed his contract yet…press conference postponed….jimmy is coming back

I heard he failed the STD test
Mar 16, 2023 at 8:37 PM
Originally posted by Furlow:
Which one of you is this? Lol


Who else but Woo would surmise that simple?

And what's Devante think about all of this?

Mar 16, 2023 at 8:38 PM
Originally posted by Furlow:
Which one of you is this? Lol

sounds like a furlow take
Mar 16, 2023 at 8:51 PM
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by blizzuntz:
Originally posted by Young2Owens:
hasnt signed his contract yet…press conference postponed….jimmy is coming back

I heard he failed the STD test

Wants to make sure there are enough p*rn stars in Vegas
Mar 16, 2023 at 9:08 PM
  • Furlow
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 21,686
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by Furlow:
You've "said your piece" plenty. But you have yet to answer which variables changed. I'm open to hearing about them. But simply stating the obvious that the defensive players were the ones that went out there and made the plays does nothing to further this discussion.

I did answer it you just won't accept that how the opposition offense is playing, how the defense played that given day, improvement of young players, players getting healthy, opposition resting players and the like factor in. You want zero sum.

Defensive players had nothing to do with it. Again your words. So clearly mind is made up. Not open at all.

All of those variables existed before Jimmy arrived. They are painfully obvious and a given. So no, you're still not answering which variables ON THE NINERS that changed. It's a simple answer - none. Even you yourself said Jimmy was "absolutely the biggest factor" in the defensive turnaround. How can that be true if there are "all of these other factors" like the opposing team, the weather, etc?
Mar 16, 2023 at 9:09 PM
  • Furlow
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 21,686
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Furlow:
That horrendous Bears team that had a top 10 defense (9th in points allowed, 10th in yards allowed, 7th in passing yards allowed and 5th in passing TD's allowed), that we played on the road?

Oh we are talking about opposing defenses now? I thought the discussion was about how OUR defense improved with Jimmy starting.

I was merely addressing your point that the Bears were a horrendous team. They weren't.
Mar 16, 2023 at 10:06 PM
Originally posted by ItsX4Number6:
"9-5 QB"

Lol that's probably the second dumbest anti-Jimmy rhetoric pushed here and there was a lot of stupid takes.

Did you read the one recently where the guy says our defense would've been alot closer to middle-of-the-pack without Jimmy?

That's an all-timer right there.
[ Edited by random49er on Mar 16, 2023 at 10:06 PM ]
Mar 16, 2023 at 10:29 PM
Originally posted by Montana:
Wants to make sure there are enough p*rn stars in Vegas

Give up that BS. It's getting old and is obnoxious
Mar 16, 2023 at 10:37 PM
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by ItsX4Number6:
"9-5 QB"

Lol that's probably the second dumbest anti-Jimmy rhetoric pushed here and there was a lot of stupid takes.

Did you read the one recently where the guy says our defense would've been alot closer to middle-of-the-pack without Jimmy?

That's an all-timer right there.

Nearly the same defense (player wise) was far worse when other QBs who weren't as efficient as jimmy were playing. Idk if we would of been middle-of-the-pack but definitely not as good as we've seen. It's a team sport. Its just a fact that all three phases of the game impact each other. That goes for every team, not just jimmy lead ones.

if someone doesn't understand that then those folks just don't understand football.
[ Edited by tankle104 on Mar 16, 2023 at 10:38 PM ]

Mar 16, 2023 at 10:37 PM
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Furlow:
That horrendous Bears team that had a top 10 defense (9th in points allowed, 10th in yards allowed, 7th in passing yards allowed and 5th in passing TD's allowed), that we played on the road?

Oh we are talking about opposing defenses now? I thought the discussion was about how OUR defense improved with Jimmy starting.

I was merely addressing your point that the Bears were a horrendous team. They weren't.

Literally worst record in the league. Lmao so pretty much everyone but us (with one of the best rosters in the league) beat them. Trey (the entire offense - but that starts with Trey) didn't have a good game. It's not a big deal.

i don't understand people defending this? Why not dissect the film and be honest about the play overall. It wasn't good. It was an ugly ass game.
[ Edited by tankle104 on Mar 16, 2023 at 10:40 PM ]
Mar 17, 2023 at 3:07 AM
SIGN THE GOD DAMN CONTRACT JIMMY!!
Mar 17, 2023 at 3:37 AM
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by ItsX4Number6:
"9-5 QB"

Lol that's probably the second dumbest anti-Jimmy rhetoric pushed here and there was a lot of stupid takes.

Did you read the one recently where the guy says our defense would've been alot closer to middle-of-the-pack without Jimmy?

That's an all-timer right there.

Nearly the same defense (player wise) was far worse when other QBs who weren't as efficient as jimmy were playing. Idk if we would of been middle-of-the-pack but definitely not as good as we've seen. It's a team sport. Its just a fact that all three phases of the game impact each other. That goes for every team, not just jimmy lead ones.

if someone doesn't understand that then those folks just don't understand football.

Go check the injury list in 2018 and 2020. We had a lot of players that were injured, not just Jimmy.
Mar 17, 2023 at 3:40 AM
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by ItsX4Number6:
"9-5 QB"

Lol that's probably the second dumbest anti-Jimmy rhetoric pushed here and there was a lot of stupid takes.

Did you read the one recently where the guy says our defense would've been alot closer to middle-of-the-pack without Jimmy?

That's an all-timer right there.

If it wasn't for Jimmy, Bosa would've been a bust.
Mar 17, 2023 at 3:41 AM
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by ItsX4Number6:
"9-5 QB"

Lol that's probably the second dumbest anti-Jimmy rhetoric pushed here and there was a lot of stupid takes.

Did you read the one recently where the guy says our defense would've been alot closer to middle-of-the-pack without Jimmy?

That's an all-timer right there.

If it wasn't for Jimmy, Bosa would've been a bust.

lol this made me chuckle more than I shoud've...
Search
YouTube
Flipboard
Threads
×
Share 49ersWebzone