Report: Nick Sorensen will not return as 49ers' defensive coordinator →

There are 359 users in the forums

Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Shop 49ers game tickets
Jimmy gon jimmy
Originally posted by 49ersRing:



Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Jimmy gon jimmy

They planned on a better contract originally? Raiders gonna Raiders.
Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Jimmy gon jimmy

They planned on a better contract originally? Raiders gonna Raiders.

/Facepalm for both parties involved
Imagine if they cut him and we get enough injuries that he comes back. That would be so absurd that I'm almost rooting for it to happen.
Tom Brady can't be that petty can he?

He's a raiders shareholder now. Could he be trying to bump Jimmy out to play on the team?Maybe just do it out of spite?
  • Kolohe
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 62,806
But but but he could've played the NFCC. You guys remember that b******t people were throwing around here.
[ Edited by 9erson3 on May 29, 2023 at 10:06 AM ]
Originally posted by TonyStarks:
Tom Brady can't be that petty can he?

He's a raiders shareholder now. Could he be trying to bump Jimmy out to play on the team?Maybe just do it out of spite?

Brady can't play if in ownership unless voted and allowed by all NFL owners. Won't happen.
Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
Originally posted by TonyStarks:
Tom Brady can't be that petty can he?

He's a raiders shareholder now. Could he be trying to bump Jimmy out to play on the team?Maybe just do it out of spite?

Brady can't play if in ownership unless voted and allowed by all NFL owners. Won't happen.

Why wouldn't it? Brady would increase league revenue. Especially if he plays while partially owning a team.
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
Originally posted by TonyStarks:
Tom Brady can't be that petty can he?

He's a raiders shareholder now. Could he be trying to bump Jimmy out to play on the team?Maybe just do it out of spite?

Brady can't play if in ownership unless voted and allowed by all NFL owners. Won't happen.

Why wouldn't it? Brady would increase league revenue. Especially if he plays while partially owning a team.

Because the other owners would never unanimously vote to approve it. Why would the new Broncos owner want to face Brady?
  • Furlow
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 22,289
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Imagine if they cut him and we get enough injuries that he comes back. That would be so absurd that I'm almost rooting for it to happen.

The Webzone would melt down lol.
Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
Originally posted by TonyStarks:
Tom Brady can't be that petty can he?

He's a raiders shareholder now. Could he be trying to bump Jimmy out to play on the team?Maybe just do it out of spite?

Brady can't play if in ownership unless voted and allowed by all NFL owners. Won't happen.

Why wouldn't it? Brady would increase league revenue. Especially if he plays while partially owning a team.

Because the other owners would never unanimously vote to approve it. Why would the new Broncos owner want to face Brady?

Would it need to be unanimous?
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Imagine if they cut him and we get enough injuries that he comes back. That would be so absurd that I'm almost rooting for it to happen.

The Webzone would melt down lol.

this thread would hit 3 million comments that week.
Search Share 49ersWebzone