Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by Dsoto87:
Nah bro. Jimmy is a winner. Who would want that career loser Stafford? 🤦🏽🤣

Haha,...let's celebrate this past year and a half of hot takes galore....

.

.

.

.

Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
Crazy thing is. Without that 66 yard FG in 3 games Goff almost did what Stafford could never do. Beat a team at .500 or above. Loser Stafford was like 7 out of 68 or something. One of the worst stats in sports history. Straight garbage.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Jimmy is still here and I have always said the draft was the way to upgrade while you guys were clamoring for Stafford.
Stafford is old, a loser and on the Average tier with Jimmy and Kirk. It would be a terrible move for the 49ers to laterally upgrade to a qb on the same tier who is a loser and older.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
LOL, Stafford is a loser even when the Lions were good he lost.

The Stafford Club is delusional.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
The Lions did ditch Stafford.

Originally posted by NCommand:
Jimmy >>>>>>>>> Stafford.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
This is ideal, not a desperation move to an old loser QB like Stafford

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

The bet was Who Will Have a Higher Win% in 2021, Jimmy or Stafford.

I'll take Jimmy.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Sure it is, definitely as much or more of an valuatiom than given by the person I replied to.
I evaluated his ability, mediocre.
His status as a winner or loser, loser.
His age, old.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Getting a Stafford or Cousins would be a mistake, they are not much better than JG if at all.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Stafford is meh and old...

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Stafford or Kirk would be disaster moves.

How can you not love our resident experts?

For faithful....

And this doesn't include a couple other posters. Including you, faithful. You've 100% said you rather have Jimmy.

First off 90% of these are from Woo. Second, I don't see anything saying JG is better than Stafford here except NCommand and I have no clue the context on that one. As to saying I'd rather have JG understand it's a notion of how much better is Stafford and does it justify the opportunity cost which we ultimately spent on Trey.

I mean the real question is would you rather have Trey or Stafford? Do you know how many Trey will win? This whole Matty S convo will look really dumb if Trey lights it up and is a Franchise Super Bowl winning QB. I mean I'd much rather have a franchise QB in his early 20s than one who is 34.

This

I was for drafting an heir apparent rather than going the Cousins/Stafford route.

"Just give the Ram$, and their bought championship their due credit 49ers fans!"

Me:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Deebo is a 49er player not a fan.

Which means what? He hates his team according to you.

I never said anyone hated anything.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
So if his good not great what the hell is Jimmy lol?

Stafford had 4,900 yards 41 TD to 17 INTs completing 67% of his passes. They avg less then 100 yards rushing a game (24th in the league).

Stafford avg 300 yards passing and had 9TDs to 3 INTs in the playoffs. SF avg 170 yards per game with 2 TDs to 3 INTs. Matt wasn't lights out yesterday, but overall in the playoffs and this yr he was pretty damn good and it blows he's the QB for LA.

It doesn't blow he's the QB for LA. We were 2-1 this year vs LA and up 10 in the one we lost. This close to sweeping these guys. Anyway, he's 34 so I'm not worried. We got Trey.

Doesn't blow for Jimmy that he's been the QB for SF either....I'm more than fine with Trey and I get why they went in that direction. People calling Stafford a loser and I'd rather have him over Jimmy is silly though. Everyone's initialed to their opinions, but there's also nothing wrong with saying you were wrong about it after the dude just won a SB and put up some great numbers overall.

We're all adults in here (I think) calling people a Ram's fan because you think Stafford is good (before he even joined the Rams) is childish imo. I couldn't stand Sherm but I knew he was damn good while in Seattle...I was on board bringing in a talented player all the same.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
First off 90% of these are from Woo. Second, I don't see anything saying JG is better than Stafford here except NCommand and I have no clue the context on that one. As to saying I'd rather have JG understand it's a notion of how much better is Stafford and does it justify the opportunity cost which we ultimately spent on Trey.

I mean the real question is would you rather have Trey or Stafford? Do you know how many Trey will win? This whole Matty S convo will look really dumb if Trey lights it up and is a Franchise Super Bowl winning QB. I mean I'd much rather have a franchise QB in his early 20s than one who is 34.

Well yes, he started it and he led the charge.

But there are pages and pages of this nonsensical rhetoric from others as well,...I just have to have a limit.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
What discussion?

That Stafford doesn't suck and he's never sucked...he's talented as s**t and it stinks that he's in LA. He would have been a massive upgrade to Jimmy and I'm glad that they at least looked into making a move for him.

I'm completely fine with Lance and can't wait to see his development.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Deebo is a 49er player not a fan.

Which means what? He hates his team according to you.

I never said anyone hated anything.

OH sorry that we were actively rooting for LA to win



He's better than you will admit and it's silly to die on the Stafford is a loser hill...he would have been a massive upgrade to Jimmy. period.

So when do we make fun of the posters who called Odell Beckham jr a washed up cancer who only cares about boat trips in Miami during the playoffs?

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by Dsoto87:
Nah bro. Jimmy is a winner. Who would want that career loser Stafford? 🤦🏽🤣

Haha,...let's celebrate this past year and a half of hot takes galore....

.

.

.

.

Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
Crazy thing is. Without that 66 yard FG in 3 games Goff almost did what Stafford could never do. Beat a team at .500 or above. Loser Stafford was like 7 out of 68 or something. One of the worst stats in sports history. Straight garbage.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Jimmy is still here and I have always said the draft was the way to upgrade while you guys were clamoring for Stafford.
Stafford is old, a loser and on the Average tier with Jimmy and Kirk. It would be a terrible move for the 49ers to laterally upgrade to a qb on the same tier who is a loser and older.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
LOL, Stafford is a loser even when the Lions were good he lost.

The Stafford Club is delusional.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
The Lions did ditch Stafford.

Originally posted by NCommand:
Jimmy >>>>>>>>> Stafford.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
This is ideal, not a desperation move to an old loser QB like Stafford

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

The bet was Who Will Have a Higher Win% in 2021, Jimmy or Stafford.

I'll take Jimmy.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Sure it is, definitely as much or more of an valuatiom than given by the person I replied to.
I evaluated his ability, mediocre.
His status as a winner or loser, loser.
His age, old.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Getting a Stafford or Cousins would be a mistake, they are not much better than JG if at all.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Stafford is meh and old...

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Stafford or Kirk would be disaster moves.

How can you not love our resident experts?

For faithful....

And this doesn't include a couple other posters. Including you, faithful. You've 100% said you rather have Jimmy.

First off 90% of these are from Woo. Second, I don't see anything saying JG is better than Stafford here except NCommand and I have no clue the context on that one. As to saying I'd rather have JG understand it's a notion of how much better is Stafford and does it justify the opportunity cost which we ultimately spent on Trey.

I mean the real question is would you rather have Trey or Stafford? Do you know how many Trey will win? This whole Matty S convo will look really dumb if Trey lights it up and is a Franchise Super Bowl winning QB. I mean I'd much rather have a franchise QB in his early 20s than one who is 34.

This

I was for drafting an heir apparent rather than going the Cousins/Stafford route.

That was right after we crushed Stafford and the Rams. He 'was' better...that game.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

What discussion?

That Stafford doesn't suck and he's never sucked...he's talented as s**t and it stinks that he's in LA. He would have been a massive upgrade to Jimmy and I'm glad that they at least looked into making a move for him.

I'm completely fine with Lance and can't wait to see his development.

He doesn't suck.

I am on Shanahan's side and prefer Lance.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

OH sorry that we were actively rooting for LA to win



He's better than you will admit and it's silly to die on the Stafford is a loser hill...he would have been a massive upgrade to Jimmy. period.

I think Lance and Jimmy are better and the 49ers almost ended up in the same situayion with Jimmy and Lance.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
OH sorry that we were actively rooting for LA to win



He's better than you will admit and it's silly to die on the Stafford is a loser hill...he would have been a massive upgrade to Jimmy. period.

I think Lance and Jimmy are better and the 49ers almost ended up in the same situayion with Jimmy and Lance.

Jimmy is NOT better than Stafford 🤣🤣🤣

Originally posted by BMoore56:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
OH sorry that we were actively rooting for LA to win



He's better than you will admit and it's silly to die on the Stafford is a loser hill...he would have been a massive upgrade to Jimmy. period.

I think Lance and Jimmy are better and the 49ers almost ended up in the same situayion with Jimmy and Lance.

Jimmy is NOT better than Stafford 🤣🤣🤣

This is perfect encapsulation of all these 1000s pages of JG / Stafford. Someone says one thing. Another person totally misreads it.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by BMoore56:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
OH sorry that we were actively rooting for LA to win



He's better than you will admit and it's silly to die on the Stafford is a loser hill...he would have been a massive upgrade to Jimmy. period.

I think Lance and Jimmy are better and the 49ers almost ended up in the same situayion with Jimmy and Lance.

Jimmy is NOT better than Stafford 🤣🤣🤣

This is perfect encapsulation of all these 1000s pages of JG / Stafford. Someone says one thing. Another person totally misreads it.

He's using Lance as an avenue out of his original comments is why. He talked crap about Stafford long before Lance ever declared for the draft.

I guess quoting the guy 10+ times doesn't clear that up for you, though.