LOL Browns

Browns will be built to win that division for years to come, not sure if they have to coach to do it.

I still think they're Browning it up. Just not a fan of Taylor. With the weapons they got why you want a qb whose best year is 3000 yards?

Originally posted by tjd808185:

I still think they're Browning it up. Just not a fan of Taylor. With the weapons they got why you want a qb whose best year is 3000 yards?

Best bridge QB they could get? Jackson has a preference to mobile QBs? Gives the rookie they draft the freedom to just sit for a year and learn the game?

Originally posted by tjd808185:

I still think they're Browning it up. Just not a fan of Taylor. With the weapons they got why you want a qb whose best year is 3000 yards?

He's their Hoyer. But it's silly they had to get a Hoyer for a third round pick.

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Best bridge QB they could get? Jackson has a preference to mobile QBs? Gives the rookie they draft the freedom to just sit for a year and learn the game?

Haley is running the o now but if they go 1-6 the rook is going to play anyways.

With Hue as the coach, a rent qb, this team could quit in a second.

Originally posted by Lobo49er:

He's their Hoyer. But it's silly they had to get a Hoyer for a third round pick.

He's far better than Hoyer.

Originally posted by frenchmov:

Peppers was garbage

With the addition of Randall he'll be freed up to play SS full time and be up around the line of scrimmage where he can wreak havoc and do his thing.

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Originally posted by Lobo49er:

He's their Hoyer. But it's silly they had to get a Hoyer for a third round pick.

He's far better than Hoyer.

Not really.

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Originally posted by Lobo49er:
He's their Hoyer. But it's silly they had to get a Hoyer for a third round pick.

He's far better than Hoyer.

I agree. Hoyer is a backup QB. Period. Taylor might not be great but he is good enough to be a starter for some teams in the NFL. To me there is no question which player I would prefer.

Lol, Taylor. Browns have to hope they draft their future qb

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Originally posted by Lobo49er:
He's their Hoyer. But it's silly they had to get a Hoyer for a third round pick.

He's far better than Hoyer.

Probably their best QB since Vinny.

Originally posted by Predator85:

Browns will be built to win that division for years to come, not sure if they have to coach to do it.

Can't win w/o a QB. They've had like 30 straight busts. The browns are either grossly incompetent or cursed.

Originally posted by jcs:

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Originally posted by Lobo49er:

He's their Hoyer. But it's silly they had to get a Hoyer for a third round pick.

He's far better than Hoyer.

Probably their best QB since Vinny.

That's saying nothing.

Originally posted by Lobo49er:

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Originally posted by Lobo49er:
He's their Hoyer. But it's silly they had to get a Hoyer for a third round pick.

He's far better than Hoyer.

Not really.

Taylor has at least made the pro bowl. I know that honor now isn't as big as it was before but hoyer hasn't even sniffed a pro bowl vote.

Originally posted by Lobo49er:

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Originally posted by Lobo49er:

He's their Hoyer. But it's silly they had to get a Hoyer for a third round pick.

He's far better than Hoyer.

Not really.

Yes really. In the right scheme he's a pretty good QB. He can rack up yards on the ground and is one of the better deep passers in football. That makes him a very good fit for Hue's offense.


Buffalo had a pretty good offense going under Roman calling plays to Taylor's strengths. He was lights out that first year, played exceptionally well.


I don't think he's a franchise QB but he is an excellent stopgap. He's the best QB that Cleveland has had since Tim Couch who never really had a chance due to playing behind an expansion OL.