Originally posted by dj43:
Originally posted by GhostOfBaalke:
Originally posted by dj43:
Williams has proven to be a better runner, so far. More power. Hunt was a greater receiving threat.
Fuller was an upgrade from Peters but that still left them with Nelson and Parker on the back end and both were liabilities.
The defensive failures are widespread. They are telling their fans that Sutton was a large part of that. Time will tell.
You might think he's better, and he might end up better but no he hasn't proven to be better. He played like 5 games. Hunt played 27 games and had proven to be one of the best RBs in the league.
Are you sure Fuller is an upgrade from Peters? Big statement there.
Yes, it is a small sample with Williams but his average in those games was 5.1 to Hunt's 4.6. The eye test shows Williams to get more YAC in those games.
PFF ranks Fuller #30. Peters is #95. No matter what one may think of PFF that is a huge difference.
In another thread there were several clips of Peters in run defense. No effort at all.
You were upset people were using Mahomes 50 TD stats compared to Alex Smith never coming close. But are really discrediting what Hunt has done because Damien Williams has averaged .5 more yards per carry in the 5 games he's played (against raiders twice, chargers, colts, Seahawks). Who cares about Hunts 1782 scrimmage yards and 11 TD last year? Damien Williams averaged 5.1 yards a carry...
PFF might give some good info but it's not the official rankings of who's a better player. Marcus Peters hasn't been as good this year for whatever reason. But don't forget he was defensive rookie of the year, led the league in picks, second team all pro as a rookie, and first team all pro in 2016. And if you really wanna go by pff. Marcus Peters was number 14 last year and rated higher than kendall fuller was his year .
Also by your standards . Pff has Hunt at 9 this year and Williams at 14
[ Edited by GhostOfBaalke on Jan 23, 2019 at 11:22 PM ]