Originally posted by Chief:
Originally posted by glorydayz:
Originally posted by Chief:
The people defending Hill are bat s**t crazy.
He was convicted of choking and hitting his pregnant fiance, now has a three year old son with a broken arm that said he did it and is on audio recording saying some pretty sick s**t all while being under investigation.
Y'all crazy, kill or BAN that mother f**ker.
This is cool, but what about the victim? What should we do to actually help the victims? Your plan takes care of the alleged perpetrator.
What about my idea of giving the kid (alleged victim in Hills case) all of the fines paid by all players for the next 10 season?
Well, if the father can be reformed and be a positive figure in the child's life that would be great. If the mother is also deemed to be not an acceptable parent. You have to look at grand parents, foster care and other options.. and the Chiefs and NFL need to possibly help the kid too.
So once again the perp needs to lose his job & go to jail, but the victim should possibly be given resources. So none of this is about the victim, then why are we acting like we care about the situation? Could it be that we don't like what the perp looks like? I mean people were quick to minimize Larry Bear's situation, I wonder why?
If the NFL isn't going to focus on helping the victims, maybe they should get out of the DV prevention business and focus on football.
